Portal Activity (News and Rumors)

#1,226
#1,226
ACvol3 said:
So what’s the reason for burns transfer??
Click to expand...
According to the last 49 pages of posts, LSU and TCU are willing to pay him a million dollars, he hates Frank Anderson, mad about losing his starting role and regulated to the bullpen, agent wants him to go a Big 10 school to look better against seeker competition. I’m sure I’m missing a few other rumors…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeadVol77, Scvol7906, VolGirl81 and 20 others
#1,227
#1,227
OldTimer said:
According to the last 49 pages of posts, LSU and TCU are willing to pay him a million dollars, he hates Frank Anderson, mad about losing his starting role and regulated to the bullpen, agent wants him to go a Big 10 school to look better against seeker competition. I’m sure I’m missing a few other rumors…..
Click to expand...
…and he always wanted to go to Vandy, his favorite childhood school. I think that covers it. 😁
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolGirl81, chuckiepoo, ttatj and 5 others
#1,228
#1,228
OldTimer said:
According to the last 49 pages of posts, LSU and TCU are willing to pay him a million dollars, he hates Frank Anderson, mad about losing his starting role and regulated to the bullpen, agent wants him to go a Big 10 school to look better against seeker competition. I’m sure I’m missing a few other rumors…..
Click to expand...

and following his GF, oh wait never mind that was Beam
 
  • Like
Reactions: mackievol, Scvol7906, chuckiepoo and 4 others
#1,234
#1,234
OldTimer said:
According to the last 49 pages of posts, LSU and TCU are willing to pay him a million dollars, he hates Frank Anderson, mad about losing his starting role and regulated to the bullpen, agent wants him to go a Big 10 school to look better against seeker competition. I’m sure I’m missing a few other rumors…..
Click to expand...
Smokey bit him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scvol7906, chuckiepoo, knoxvol52 and 3 others
#1,235
#1,235
OldTimer said:
According to the last 49 pages of posts, LSU and TCU are willing to pay him a million dollars, he hates Frank Anderson, mad about losing his starting role and regulated to the bullpen, agent wants him to go a Big 10 school to look better against seeker competition. I’m sure I’m missing a few other rumors…..
Click to expand...
I think he fell on a helmet as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scvol7906, chuckiepoo, greasemachine and 1 other person
#1,240
#1,240
If Chase filed on Thursday (unlikely) we would have heard today. If he filed on Friday, we’ll hear tomorrow, Monday then on Wednesday, either way, this saga is over soon, one way or the other.
 
#1,241
#1,241
vol66 said:
If Chase filed on Thursday (unlikely) we would have heard today. If he filed on Friday, we’ll hear tomorrow, Monday then on Wednesday, either way, this saga is over soon, one way or the other.
Click to expand...
on Thursday will Heflin and Ben McKee were confident he was returning. Less than 24 hours later, he was gone and not returning phone calls. Things change in a hurry, both ways
 
#1,242
#1,242
Christian Lowe said:
on Thursday will Heflin and Ben McKee were confident he was returning. Less than 24 hours later, he was gone and not returning phone calls. Things change in a hurry, both ways
Click to expand...

Don’t care about that, just posting the schedule, those guys don’t know any more than me and you.
 
#1,245
#1,245
vol66 said:
We recruited Mookie Betts, he quite literally waited until the last hour to decide if he was going to school or taking the money. You can imagine the 24 hours before the decision on here. They just did a segment on him which is why I recalled it on ESPN. Couldn’t be happier for him, he made the right decision but it flat out sucked at the time.
Click to expand...


Betts would have been the best recruit that Dave Serrano ever nabbed.
 
#1,249
#1,249
GregAmsler said:
I get what you’re saying. And I don’t disagree. Every one of SCOTUS’ cases involves a statute or case law or a local code or any form of law. And they are determining if it (or a ruling in which it is the issue) is constitutional. That’s day 1 Constitutional Law…SCOTUS is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution. They hear cases to determine if a law or proposed law violates the federal constitution. Otherwise, SCOTUS has no jurisdiction and cannot grant cert.
Click to expand...

This is getting very far afield from the transfer portal, and I’m not interested in point-scoring here, but as I said before, this is just not accurate. SCOTUS hears lots of cases that don’t involve any constitutional questions. Here is a fairly recent article talking about a couple of statutory interpretation cases — nothing to do with the Constitution. Alston is another one.

GregAmsler said:
Violation of the Sherman Act is still a violation of the Constitution due to the Constitutional Law concept of preemption, giving the federal government the authority to pass laws re: commerce, which is a roundabout way of getting there, but that’s not uncommon. So we’ve decided that the SA is constitutional. To violate it is not.
Click to expand...

Similarly, violating the Sherman Act has nothing to do with the Constitution (at least not in any remotely direct sense). The Sherman Act may be constitutional, but violating it is not unconstitutional — it is just violating the Sherman Act. The commerce clause gives the federal government the power to pass laws regarding interstate commerce. Federal preemption (i.e. the supremacy clause) means that if state law conflicts with valid federal law, the state law is preempted (e.g. if state law prohibited front license plates but federal law required front license plates, the state law would be invalid).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top