The Hunter Biden Thread

#4,777
#4,777
Septic said:
No one is disputing it was heard. It's your constant leaps to conclusions because twitter said so.
Click to expand...

Blah blah blah is all I hear coming out of that pie hole..These tweets are from people that keep their ears to the ground in the news & report back w/facts. Only libtard loonys don't except it bc it doesn't line up with their radical agenda they crave to hear.
 
#4,779
#4,779
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Blah blah blah is all I hear coming out of that pie hole..These tweets are from people that keep their ears to the ground in the news & report back w/facts. Only libtard loonys don't except it bc it doesn't line up with their radical agenda they crave to hear.
Click to expand...
He’s not a liberal. Far from it. He simply won’t take any position that could be even remotely construed as being pro-Trump.

And I get that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#4,780
#4,780
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Blah blah blah is all I hear coming out of that pie hole..These tweets are from people that keep their ears to the ground in the news & report back w/facts. Only libtard loonys don't except it bc it doesn't line up with their radical agenda they crave to hear.
Click to expand...
If you read it on Twitter, it must be true.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol and Septic
#4,781
#4,781
85SugarVol said:
The US Navy went on record that they heard the implosion on Sunday?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what you're asking. They didn't announce that Sunday, but they have since said they heard an explosion or implosion Sunday. The article claims they have some advanced technology they use to detect submarines. I'm sure there are plenty of conspiracies that could be cooked up whether they announced it on Sunday or not, but "we heard something in the area, so they're probably dead," probably isn't the best way to handle it.

Edit: just to clarify, my understanding is that the navy has gone "on record" about anything. The WSJ article i read cites an anonymous source.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#4,782
#4,782
clarksvol00 said:
I'm not sure what you're asking. They didn't announce that Sunday, but they have since said they heard an explosion or implosion Sunday. The article claims they have some advanced technology they use to detect submarines. I'm sure there are plenty of conspiracies that could be cooked up whether they announced it on Sunday or not, but "we heard something in the area, so they're probably dead," probably isn't the best way to handle it.
Click to expand...
What I have read is that they notified the coast guard of their findings when the search started
 
#4,783
#4,783
volfanhill said:
What I have read is that they notified the coast guard of their findings when the search started
Click to expand...
Yes. It's all in the WSJ article. I think the whole conspiracy thing is "they knew it on sunday," whereas the reality is, "they heard an explosion, they found out the ship disappeared and told the coast guard what they heard." None of those add up to, "they knew they were dead and hid it to distract from Hunter Biden."
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#4,784
#4,784
clarksvol00 said:
Yes. It's all in the WSJ article. I think the whole conspiracy thing is "they knew it on sunday," whereas the reality is, "they heard an explosion, they found out the ship disappeared and told the coast guard what they heard." None of those add up to, "they knew they were dead and hid it to distract from Hunter Biden."
Click to expand...
@volfanhill I added an edit if you want to reconsider the like. Just fyi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#4,786
#4,786
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Blah blah blah is all I hear coming out of that pie hole..These tweets are from people that keep their ears to the ground in the news & report back w/facts. Only libtard loonys don't except it bc it doesn't line up with their radical agenda they crave to hear.
Click to expand...
That's not the case at all. These tweets are coming from people trying to spin a WSJ article that you probably haven't and never will read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#4,787
#4,787
clarksvol00 said:
I'm not sure what you're asking. They didn't announce that Sunday, but they have since said they heard an explosion or implosion Sunday. The article claims they have some advanced technology they use to detect submarines. I'm sure there are plenty of conspiracies that could be cooked up whether they announced it on Sunday or not, but "we heard something in the area, so they're probably dead," probably isn't the best way to handle it.
Click to expand...
Wasn’t asking any more than the stated question. If the Navy heard the implosion, they knew they were dead. That’s all.
 
#4,788
#4,788
85SugarVol said:
He’s not a liberal. Far from it. He simply won’t take any position that could be even remotely construed as being pro-Trump.

And I get that.
Click to expand...
85SugarVol said:
He’s not a liberal. Far from it. He simply won’t take any position that could be even remotely construed as being pro-Trump.

And I get that.
Click to expand...

Anti Biden doesn’t necessarily equate to pro Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77 and GordonC
#4,789
#4,789
85SugarVol said:
Wasn’t asking any more than the stated question. If the Navy heard the implosion, they knew they were dead. That’s all.
Click to expand...
I think what would be very irresponsible to say, "we heard what we think was an explosion in the vicinty, so we know they are dead." I think it would be much more responsible to focus the search in the area, confirm they are dead, then announce it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic and Sandman 423
#4,791
#4,791
clarksvol00 said:
I think what would be very irresponsible to say, "we heard what we think was an explosion in the vicinty, so we know they are dead." I think it would be much more responsible to focus the search in the area, confirm they are dead, then announce it.
Click to expand...
I’m pretty sure they found debris that was confirmed to be part of the sub. I read that in USA Today, anyways.
 
#4,792
#4,792
clarksvol00 said:
I think what would be very irresponsible to say, "we heard what we think was an explosion in the vicinty, so we know they are dead." I think it would be much more responsible to focus the search in the area, confirm they are dead, then announce it.
Click to expand...
I understand that position.

But when you choose to withhold information like that, and it later comes to light, it gives air to others.
 
#4,793
#4,793
85SugarVol said:
He’s not a liberal. Far from it. He simply won’t take any position that could be even remotely construed as being pro-Trump.

And I get that.
Click to expand...
JOEY’S ALL VOL !!! said:
Anti Biden doesn’t necessarily equate to pro Trump.
Click to expand...

You're right. However, for many on this forum, being anti-trump absolutely equates to being a "libtard." It's sad that people have to live in a black and white world where it can't be reconciled that many people like me don't like either - for these knuckle draggers all they'll focus on is the internalized outrage of being anti trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonC
#4,794
#4,794
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Blah blah blah is all I hear coming out of that pie hole..These tweets are from people that keep their ears to the ground in the news & report back w/facts. Only libtard loonys don't except it bc it doesn't line up with their radical agenda they crave to hear.
Click to expand...

Jack Posobeic, "cat-turd" and some lady hawking the anti hunter biden book she wrote.

Yes, all acclaimed professionals known for their unbiased approach to journalistic excellence.
 
#4,795
#4,795
Septic said:
You're right. However, for many on this forum, being anti-trump absolutely equates to being a "libtard." It's sad that people have to live in a black and white world where it can't be reconciled that many people like me don't like either - for these knuckle draggers all they'll focus on is the internalized outrage of being anti trump.
Click to expand...

I've been called "MAGA" and a "libbie communist" in the same thread more than once....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol and GordonC
#4,796
#4,796
Septic said:
Jack Posobeic, "cat-turd" and some lady hawking the anti hunter biden book she wrote.

Yes, all acclaimed professionals known for their unbiased approach to journalistic excellence.
Click to expand...

In this day and age of news coming from everywhere, what source(s) provides the "unbiased approach" to journalism that you rely on?
 
#4,797
#4,797
Septic said:
You're right. However, for many on this forum, being anti-trump absolutely equates to being a "libtard." It's sad that people have to live in a black and white world where it can't be reconciled that many people like me don't like either - for these knuckle draggers all they'll focus on is the internalized outrage of being anti trump.
Click to expand...
And anything anti-Biden is immediately construed as “Maga” by others.

It’s lazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and JOEY’S ALL VOL !!!
#4,799
#4,799
If Hunters last name wasn't Biden, he would not have been charged with anything. Was money he received from the Ukraine business so much different than the millions Jared received from Saudi or Ivanka got from China?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top