The Hunter Biden Thread

[Septic]

Hey Janice!
View attachment 558374

Terry Tate - Office Linebacker is classic!

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Majors]

And what you wrote is a complete non sequitur

He concurred trans, fought terrorism and brought races together over basketball. That’s movie range, he should get a free pass on his taxes.

 

[Septic]

Other then the mistake in my post, I'm sad to see you on the side of pro child porn.. Thought you were better then that.

 

[Septic]

And what you wrote is a complete non sequitur

 

[BreatheUT]

The pictures on the laptop are on the web. I'll link it when I get home later

I'm not sure I want to see it. I know they aren't hard to fin

LMAO. I wouldn’t get carried away calling anybody “morally bankrupt”. Remind me again who it was that was doing a porn star while his third wife was six months pregnant and then paid hush money to keep her quiet so that it wouldn’t become a campaign issue? Who was it again that bragged publicly about being able to grab any woman he wants by her nether region? Who has made a living for decades out of bilking contractors and banks? Who was it that mocked a disabled person during a speech? Who recently lost a civil suit for assaulting a woman? My memory fails me in my old age. Who was that again?

He who lives in glass houses…… Yeah, the Bidens certainly ain’t clean but Trump is most certainly not the kind of person I want leading my country. The epitome of “morally bankrupt”.

There is a difference between being morally bankrupt and being imperfect. I don't know if you know the difference. You give known examples of a few things someone has said. I wonder if a fly on the wall would hear the "N" word coming from your household throughout your life and other nefarious things.

Do you seriously know how long the list is of the things Biden has done? The moral equivalency you think you've made falls short.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

BidenLaptopMedia.com

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I'm not sure I want to see it. I know they aren't hard to fin


There is a difference between being morally bankrupt and being imperfect. I don't know if you know the difference. You give known examples of a few things someone has said. I wonder if a fly on the wall would hear the "N" word coming from your household throughout your life and other nefarious things.

Do you seriously know how long the list is of the things Biden has done? The moral equivalency you think you've made falls short.

Why wouldn't you want to look at them? They are all censored but you can readily see what a scumbag he is even so.

 

[BreatheUT]

Why wouldn't you want to look at them? They are all censored but you can readily see what a scumbag he is even so.

I didn't mean to combine those two posts. I thought I had deleted yours. That tells you I still don't know how to use the insert quotes feature.

 

[AM64]

Willful obstruction and lying to the feds isn't a gray area.

If this were Democrat you'd be frothing at the mouth.

So what part of the Constitution prohibits lying to the feds? How did that come into being in the first place?

 

[hog88]

So what part of the Constitution prohibits lying to the feds? How did that come into being in the first place?

Why should it be legal to lie to the government? If everyone could lie to the government with impunity it would be chaos and they wouldn't be able to effectively do their jobs.

 

[AM64]

Why should it be legal to lie to the government? If everyone could lie to the government with impunity it would be chaos and they wouldn't be able to effectively do their jobs.

Enforcement at other levels still manage to work. I admit to being rabidly anti authority, but a law against lying in an inquisition is just an opening for abuse and an end run on the right against self incrimination. Ask someone enough questions in a variety of ways with little twists, with only yes/no as the response, and you will eventually find a contradiction ... a "lie". If you think someone is guilty of a crime, prove it; it's not up the the person to do the work for the cop or other investigator. That's Nazi Germany level thuggery.

 

[hog88]

Enforcement at other levels still manage to work. I admit to being rabidly anti authority, but a law against lying in an inquisition is just an opening for abuse and an end run on the right against self incrimination. Ask someone enough questions in a variety of ways with little twists, with only yes/no as the response, and you will eventually find a contradiction ... a "lie". If you think someone is guilty of a crime, prove it; it's not up the the person to do the work for the cop or other investigator. That's Nazi Germany level thuggery.

if you have nothing to hide you shouldn't fear self incrimination.

 

[AM64]

if you have nothing to hide you shouldn't fear self incrimination.

Have you been lounging in alt TX for a couple of weeks? And, yes, in theory that should absolutely hold true.

 

[hog88]

Have you been lounging in alt TX for a couple of weeks? And, yes, in theory that should absolutely hold true.

No, I haven't been to TX. Beautiful state, can't wait to go back some day.

 

[AM64]

No, I haven't been to TX. Beautiful state, can't wait to go back some day.

OK. Who are you, and what have you done with hog? Maybe the tale about being fed to the fish was actually not humor.

 

[hog88]

OK. Who are you, and what have you done with hog? Maybe the tale about being fed to the fish was actually not humor.

?

 

[AM64]

?

RIP Hog

From the Gramp's thread the other day.

 

[C-south]

Have you been lounging in alt TX for a couple of weeks? And, yes, in theory that should absolutely hold true.

He’s been doing a lot of blue font in black lately.

 

[lawgator1]

"$1.2 million of taxes."


Gotta love the accuracy, amirite?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

"$1.2 million of taxes."


Gotta love the accuracy, amirite?

Just the facts, ma'am.

 

[Septic]

So what part of the Constitution prohibits lying to the feds? How did that come into being in the first place?

VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. CODE § 1001
The crime of making a false statement is governed by 18 U.S. Code § 1001. According to the statute, a violation includes anyone that willfully and knowingly:

1. falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
2. makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
3. makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.

In other words, there are three broad ways to violate this statute. The first is to conceal a material fact through fraud. This can occur without a person directly lying to the FBI. For example, handing over written documents after secretly removing an incriminating one could count as a violation of the statute.

The second prong of the statute relates directly to false statements. It is unlawful to make any materially false or fraudulent statement or representation. This goes beyond a direct lie and also covers indirectly misrepresenting the truth.

Finally, the third section covers non-verbal acts that are covered by the statute. These include providing the FBI with any forced or false document knowing it includes a materially false statement.




It came to be when Donny willingly and knowingly instructed his attorney's to make a false attestation that he'd handed back over all of the classified documents as required by the law.

 

[lawgator1]

Just the facts, ma'am.

Sort of my point. Let's get our facts right.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Sort of my point. Let's get our facts right.

Nobody ever said tweets were accurate. What's the libtards facts on this?

 

[Septic]

Why should it be legal to lie to the government? If everyone could lie to the government with impunity it would be chaos and they wouldn't be able to effectively do their jobs.

brilliant.