FBI Thread

#553
#553
BowlBrother85 said:
LOL. You want to see things only from their perspective.

Once again, their employer believed that they were refusing to perform their job duties, and also believed that they had interfered with criminal investigations, out of sympathy for the people who were under investigation.

That would be insubordination.
Click to expand...


Whatever helps you sleep. But if you are ok with telling veterans of the United States that they are fired for beliefs (they helped defend) that not only are they fired but they can't pick up their clothes for 2 months then you are a much better liberal than I am a conservative.

The 1000% refusal to ever question anything about the government by you is astonishing. Unless it's a "Trump" government then you have questions. A government that has in the very last week been exposed as corrupt. That my friend is rich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and norrislakevol
#554
#554
The credibility of the FBI has been exposed. They have already been busted for I don't know how many lies and illegalities. They lied to FISA court, lied about Hunter's laptop. Facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and norrislakevol
#556
#556
BowlBrother85 said:
You said he was a nobody? That is hardly how someone on the National Security Council staff should be described. Your opinion of him is influenced by your political leanings.
Click to expand...

Dude, the NSC has to have paper pushers. There are a lot of places they stick officers incapable of command.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and vols40
#557
#557
vols40 said:
Whatever helps you sleep. But if you are ok with telling veterans of the United States that they are fired for beliefs (they helped defend) that not only are they fired but they can't pick up their clothes for 2 months then you are a much better liberal than I am a conservative.

The 1000% refusal to ever question anything about the government by you is astonishing. Unless it's a "Trump" government then you have questions. A government that has in the very last week been exposed as corrupt. That my friend is rich.
Click to expand...
They weren't fired for beliefs.

I don't think O'Boyle was fired at all. They had security clearances pulled, because they had allegedly either interfered with or refused to participate in investigations. In other words, their employer believed that they weren't doing their jobs.
 
#561
#561
WBO said:
Really? Served 20 years as a Naval Aviator. I've checked my boxes.

But then again you just like to hate.
Click to expand...

All the Naval Aviators I interacted with in my time had one thing in common, you carry that trait. They were all insufferable pricks. Glad to know that you carry that tradition on with pride. Try a cup of humility some time.
 
#565
#565
newokie03 said:
All the Naval Aviators I interacted with in my time had one thing in common, you carry that trait. They were all insufferable pricks. Glad to know that you carry that tradition on with pride. Try a cup of humility some time.
Click to expand...
That dude loves himself bigly.

Loves letting everyone know he was an officer.
Loves letting everyone know how awesome officers are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#570
#570
hog88 said:
No, it’s not. If he wasn’t a POS he would have been in an infantry unit either on a staff or commanding a battalion.
Click to expand...

Dumb question. Is there a difference in the physical requirements to be a NSC paper pusher vs someone in the field commanding troops? Surely they wouldn’t let that Hutt actually be in combat?
 
#571
#571
sonofUT62 said:
Dumb question. Is there a difference in the physical requirements to be a NSC paper pusher vs someone in the field commanding troops? Surely they wouldn’t let that Hutt actually be in combat?
Click to expand...

He was an infantry officer and served a combat tour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#574
#574
BowlBrother85 said:
LOL. You want to see things only from their perspective.

Once again, their employer believed that they were refusing to perform their job duties, and also believed that they had interfered with criminal investigations, out of sympathy for the people who were under investigation.

That would be insubordination.
Click to expand...

Did they hold onto Strozcks clothes for two months? I must have missed that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, norrislakevol and vols40
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement


Back
Top