Gun control debate (merged)

#26,452
#26,452
luthervol said:
It may simply mean your interpretation is all wrong.
I'm going with that one.
Click to expand...

I don’t have to interpret anything. The forefathers didn’t simply write the 2nd amendment and tell us to try and figure out what they mean. They wrote it and then told us what it meant. That’s the part idiots don’t understand or fail to acknowledge.
 
#26,453
#26,453
luthervol said:
Having no interest is not the same as actively avoiding.
I'm not sure if you guys actively avoid rational thought on the gun debate or simply have no interest in applying rational thought.
Your last paragraph simply makes no sense. I simply stated how the attire would be viewed by most and provided a process in which you guys could comprehend.
Click to expand...

Nothing about you or your views are rational.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary and SpaceCoastVol
#26,456
#26,456
Pepe_Silvia said:
Volnation's Law - law stating that every thread in the VN political forum will inevitable devolve into a debate about abortion.
Click to expand...
Well apparently it is the most important thing to single women of breeding age. How else can you explain the brain dead occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#26,460
#26,460
C-south said:
I don’t have to interpret anything. The forefathers didn’t simply write the 2nd amendment and tell us to try and figure out what they mean. They wrote it and then told us what it meant. That’s the part idiots don’t understand or fail to acknowledge.
Click to expand...
Those are all things the USSC considered when they concluded (multiple times) that restrictions and regulations didn't not equal infringement.
 
#26,465
#26,465
luthervol said:
I'm pretty sure a zygote doesn't have a skull to crush, but you're the kiddiedoc.
Click to expand...

So, then, I guess you understand as much about abortion procedures as you do firearms. Would you like pics and/or videos?

Or are you just unwilling to admit and type it out because that would make you a sicko?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#26,466
#26,466
luthervol said:
Those are all things the USSC considered when they concluded (multiple times) that restrictions and regulations didn't not equal infringement.
Click to expand...
They have also ruled multiple times that many of those regulations and restrictions are infringements.
 
#26,468
#26,468
kiddiedoc said:
No, you are missing the point.

1. You understand nothing about firearms
2. You understand nothing about firearm laws
3. You understand nothing about criminals

It's a senseless debate. Take some time off VN, learn about the subjects, then get back to us.
Click to expand...
Would be easy for you to make part of that happen......just sayin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#26,469
#26,469
luthervol said:
It would make more sense for you to simply not respond. But then again, sense was never a strong point of yours.

And I see you actually had absolutely nothing to say that refutes the obvious logic of my point....typical.

Do us all a favor and resist the urge to respond.
Click to expand...
Damn I wish I was as smart as you think you are!
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary, luthervol and 2 others
#26,471
#26,471
kiddiedoc said:
So, then, I guess you understand as much about abortion procedures as you do firearms. Would you like pics and/or videos?

Or are you just unwilling to admit and type it out because that would make you a sicko?
Click to expand...
You very well may be an idiot.
 
#26,472
#26,472
turbovol said:
They're being denigrated? In what ways? Who's going show more respect---all the racist Republicans in the South? Please. The Tennessee
legislature? That bunch of feckless, middle-aged men from small towns who just kicked two African American members out of the statehouse because
they were embarrassed and humiliated by students for doing nothing about mass shootings and gun violence? The Republicans who continually gerrymander U.S. House districts to minimize the impact of the black vote? The Republicans who want to force poor black women to have babies that
would not be be raised well, grow up on the street and get dumped on by conservatives who have no empathy for the poor and disadvantaged? The Republican-led red states that have refused to take federal money to expand Medicaid in their states---which adversely affects low-income people? The Republicans who oppose nearly all legislative initiatives at the state and federal level that would help the poor? Southern red states are the poorest in the nation. You haven't been paying attention.

Yea, I can't figure out why African Americans don't run out the door on election day to vote for corrupt GOP good 'ole boys.
Click to expand...
Holy crap, you are just as ignorant as looth, and that's a tall order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary and SpaceCoastVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top