President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

[luthervol]

You ever consider that you’re in the rabbit hole and others are trying to lead you out? Probably not….

Sure, when circumstances warrant, which certainly isn't the case here.

 

[luthervol]

It will be the medical professionals that define unique situation - so that’s 1 of 3 legs removed.

All we have left now is:

- Medical Professional
- Parent & Child

What??????????????

 

[85SugarVol]

What??????????????

That’s my favorite response from you. It is your equivalent of the clown face.

 

[newyorkvol]

Sure, it is most certainly part of the conversation. I know those of you who can only deal in absolutes are having difficulty, but keep trying to work your way through it.
My oft stated position: I could easily compromise on a bill making certain surgeries illegal for anyone under the age of 18, as long as there are provisions for the extraordinary situations. I believe most every dem and repub would agree.

You guys feel free to state your position, unless that is somehow difficult.

Maybe this is a better analogy for you….

 

[C-south]

Also keep in mind, that agitation is an important part of the stain removal process.

Or just throw it away if it has s**t on it.

 

[luthervol]

That’s my favorite response from you. It is your equivalent of the clown face.

I'm glad you like it. But for me it means "I don't have a clue what you are talking about".
I never interpreted the clown face emoji that way.

 

[jmacvols1]

 

[AM64]

I feel foolish.

I've been there done that and have the dunce hat.

Most of us have been there with luther or ras. It's like a visit to the briar patch with br'er rabbit. Every time I fall for it, I remember this from a song.

Oh the prickly bush, it pricks my heart full sore
And if ever I'm out of the prickly bush
I'll never get in it any more

 

[luthervol]

Maybe this is a better analogy for you….

It is at least as equally good at supporting my position.

No one is dumb enough to say it is now illegal to amputate limbs because of a couple of stupid doctors and patients.

Sometimes, limbs need to be amputated. Sometimes they should not be amputated.
My position is "amputate them when they should be and don't amputate them when they should not be."

Again, my oft stated position: I could easily compromise on a bill making certain surgeries illegal for anyone under the age of 18, as long as there are provisions for the extraordinary situations. I believe most every dem and repub would agree.

Please, someone state a clearly worded position that differs. Good grief, you guys are absolutely phobic when it comes to actually stating and then defending a position.

 

[McDad]

Also keep in mind, that agitation is an important part of the stain removal process.

Bless your heart.

You should conduct a poll so see if your agitation provides any benefit at all or if it is just an outlet for you to be an insufferable ass.

 

[luthervol]

Or just throw it away if it has s**t on it.

That's an option, and one many of you should consider with your stained positions which can't hold up to agitation.

 

[C-south]

That's an option, and one many of you should consider with your stained positions which can't hold up to agitation.

Or simply ignore ignorance.

 

[luthervol]

Bless your heart.

You should conduct a poll so see if your agitation provides any benefit at all or if it is just an outlet for you to be an insufferable ass.

I'm 100% positive it is some of both.

 

[newyorkvol]

It is at least as equally good at supporting my position.

No one is dumb enough to say it is now illegal to amputate limbs because of a couple of stupid doctors and patients.

Sometimes, limbs need to be amputated. Sometimes they should not be amputated.
My position is "amputate them when they should be and don't amputate them when they should not be."

Again, my oft stated position: I could easily compromise on a bill making certain surgeries illegal for anyone under the age of 18, as long as there are provisions for the extraordinary situations. I believe most every dem and repub would agree.

Please, someone state a clearly worded position that differs. Good grief, you guys are absolutely phobic when it comes to actually stating and then defending a position.

How about this…
Don’t do surgery on a psychological condition.

 

[luthervol]

How about this…
Don’t do surgery on a psychological condition.

Look.....agreement!!!!!! I was confident we could get there.
Now can we agree that surgery for other purposes may very well be appropriate?

 

[newyorkvol]

Look.....agreement!!!!!! I was confident we could get there.
Now can we agree that surgery for other purposes may very well be appropriate?

My first post referred to appropriate gender surgeries…..genetic, embryonic or gestational malformations.
Gender reassignment surgery under other circumstances is treating a psychologic condition and shouldn’t be performed. Period.

 

[PEPPERJAX]

I feel foolish.

You need to take the pepperjax approach when dealing with ole Luther.

 

[jmacvols1]

 

[VolStrom]

What a F'n creep with those whisper points.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Biden's pick for US FAA Administrator pulls out of the race after GOP critics slammed his lack of experience - as US air travel deals with catalogue of shambolic near-misses

• Phillip Washington, 65, is withdrawing his nomination after Republican criticism

President Biden's pick to head the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has withdrawn himself from being considered - after facing criticism for his lack of aviation experience amid six high-profile near-miss collisions earlier this year.

Also cited by critics against Washington's ascension to top aviation regulator are his potential legal entanglements, including questions about his connection to a corruption investigation in Los Angeles while heading the county's MTA.

Biden administration's US FAA Administrator nominee Phil Washington to withdrawal nomination | Daily Mail Online

I'm sure he checked one of this administration's boxes.

 

[kiddiedoc]

I could easily compromise on a bill making certain surgeries illegal for anyone under the age of 18, as long as there are provisions for the extraordinary situations. I believe most every dem and repub would agree.

Like I said, you have no grasp of the issue if you think "every dem" agrees with banning gender- transition surgery on minors.

 

[luthervol]

Like I said, you have no grasp of the issue if you think "every dem" agrees with banning gender- transition surgery on minors.

How in the world did you miss the word MOST in my post? I'm positive that I have a better understanding of the mind of the average democrat than do you.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Number of transgender children seeking treatment surges in U.S.

 

[luthervol]

My first post referred to appropriate gender surgeries…..genetic, embryonic or gestational malformations.
Gender reassignment surgery under other circumstances is treating a psychologic condition and shouldn’t be performed. Period.

Then I guess we are pretty close to agreement, I would just change your last statement to........Gender reassignment surgery under other circumstances is treating a psychologic condition 99% of the time and shouldn’t be performed on that 99%. Period.

 

[luthervol]

Number of transgender children seeking treatment surges in U.S.

Your article claimed 56 genital surgeries in 2021 for kids between the ages of 13-17. Hardly an epidemic. If I had details on each of the 56, I might find one or two that I found appropriate, maybe zero. But I am wise enough to acknowledge the possibility that one or two may have been legitimate.

I could easily compromise on a bill making certain surgeries illegal for anyone under the age of 18, as long as there are provisions for the extraordinary situations. I believe most every dem and repub would agree.