President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

#43,502
#43,502
NorthDallas40 said:
Puddinhead polling at 38% right back to his all time lows. It’s almost like Americans don’t like this lying POS

Biden approval rating sinks once again, nearly matches lowest-ever rating
Click to expand...

How in the hell it’s as high as 38% baffles me. Who in their right mind could possibly approve of his job performance? It’s unfathomable to even consider doing so. It’s scary to think that there are that many like EL, TNribs and LG out there roaming free among us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol, tbwhhs, AM64 and 4 others
#43,509
#43,509
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc, norrislakevol, tbwhhs and 4 others
#43,512
#43,512
luthervol said:
74M voted for Trump - allegedly........ (now that is even harder to believe)
Click to expand...
Elections are what they are. Sometimes you gotta hold your nose and vote for whatever reason.

What’s hard for me to believe is based on the poll #s, if you surveyed 1000 people in America right now, roughly 350-400 would approve of the job Joe Biden has done.

Based on what??? He’s a terrible terrible President! That number should be at 10 maybe 15 people out of 1000. And that’s just because of polling miscommunication in which the responder didn’t understand the question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#43,514
#43,514
VOLS INC. said:
Elections are what they are. Sometimes you gotta hold your nose and vote for whatever reason.

What’s hard for me to believe is based on the poll #s, if you surveyed 1000 people in America right now, roughly 350-400 would approve of the job Joe Biden has done.

Based on what??? He’s a terrible terrible President! That number should be at 10 maybe 15 people out of 1000. And that’s just because of polling miscommunication in which the responder didn’t understand the question.
Click to expand...
If you surveyed people who consumed right-wing media, it would be about 10 out of 1000.
If you surveyed people who do not consume right-wing media, about 500 would approve.

If you surveyed 1000 people who do not consume right-wing media, about 900 would be glad Trump is out of office.
 
#43,515
#43,515
BowlBrother85 said:
Sure you do ... but Ashley Biden can not be legally compelled to discuss the contents of her diary - which only became public because it was stolen.
Click to expand...

You keep seeming to miss a major point. If she claims the diary was stolen, then obviously it was hers and in her handwriting. How do you suppose years after the fact someone could forge an entry in the middle of a page?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#43,516
#43,516
luthervol said:
If you surveyed people who consumed right-wing media, it would be about 10 out of 1000.
If you surveyed people who do not consume right-wing media, about 500 would approve.

If you surveyed 1000 people who do not consume right-wing media, about 900 would be glad Trump is out of office.
Click to expand...
I’ll be anxiously awaiting your list of why you approve of Joe Biden’s performance thus far. Without mentioning Trump of course.
 
#43,517
#43,517
BowlBrother85 said:
With the kind of money that they had their eyes on? Such skilled people can be found. They had an obvious motive to forge that diary.
Click to expand...

The diary entries appear to be written on both sides of the page in a bound book. How would you propose someone clean one side and fake an entry without altering the page and the contents of the other side ... or insert a new page without obvious rebinding?
 
#43,518
#43,518
85SugarVol said:
I assume the diary was evidence at some point?
SDNY, FBI, DOJ - they had it? They saw it?

Is that correct?
Click to expand...

The conclusion with respect to the diary and any official investigation by any accredited agency would be at best "They came (maybe), they saw (maybe), and they walked away."
 
#43,520
#43,520
AM64 said:
The diary entries appear to be written on both sides of the page in a bound book. How would you propose someone clean one side and fake an entry without altering the page and the contents of the other side ... or insert a new page without obvious rebinding?
Click to expand...
They wouldn't have to do that if they were forging both sides ....

The bottom line is that the people who both sold the diary and bought the diary have no integrity or credibility.

1) Who found and sold the diary?

Robert Kurlander and Aimee Harris.

From the moment they found Ashley Biden's diary, they saw it as an opportunity to make a lot of money. Not a little bit of money - but 6 figures. They first approached the Trump Campaign and requested $200K. That immediately signals what kind of people these two are ... if that diary didn't include any sensational material when they first discovered it ... it definitely would by the time they sold it. They are opportunists and gold diggers with no morals. Read their text messages to each other. They are white trash all the way.

2) Who bought the diary from them?

James O'Keefe and Project Veritas.

I have posted evidence multiple times in this thread of Project Veritas bribing an interview subject during their investigation into voter fraud. They offered a man in Minnesota $10K to lie during an interview and admit that he had harvested ballots. Project Veritas can not be trusted. You show me an investigative reporter who will bribe an interview subject to lie for them, and I will show you an investigative reporter who will forge diary entries and bribe a handwriting expert to lie for them as well.

This story will never gain traction as you obviously want it to, because it is too easy to impugn the integrity of the people who were in possession of the diary in-between the time Ashley Biden last had it and when it was finally handed over to the Delray Beach Police Department. These people (Kurlander, Harris and O'Keefe) had the time, the motive and the resources necessary to get the diary to say what they each needed it to say.
 
#43,521
#43,521
BowlBrother85 said:
They wouldn't have to do that if they were forging both sides ....

The bottom line is that the people who both sold the diary and bought the diary have no integrity or credibility.

1) Who found and sold the diary?

Robert Kurlander and Aimee Harris.

From the moment they found Ashley Biden's diary, they saw it as an opportunity to make a lot of money. Not a little bit of money - but 6 figures. They first approached the Trump Campaign and requested $200K. That immediately signals what kind of people these two are ... if that diary didn't include any sensational material when they first discovered it ... it definitely would by the time they sold it. They are opportunists and gold diggers with no morals. Read their text messages to each other. They are white trash all the way.

2) Who bought the diary from them?

James O'Keefe and Project Veritas.

I have posted evidence multiple times in this thread of Project Veritas bribing an interview subject during their investigation into voter fraud. They offered a man in Minnesota $10K to lie during an interview and admit that he had harvested ballots. Project Veritas can not be trusted. You show me an investigative reporter who will bribe an interview subject to lie for them, and I will show you an investigative reporter who will forge diary entries and bribe a handwriting expert to lie for them as well.

This story will never gain traction as you obviously want it to, because it is too easy to impugn the integrity of the people who were in possession of the diary in-between the time Ashley Biden last had it and when it was finally handed over to the Delray Beach Police Department. These people (Kurlander, Harris and O'Keefe) had the time, the motive and the resources necessary to get the diary to say what they each needed it to say.
Click to expand...

So you're saying she conveniently left them a blank page in the middle of the book so they could forge an entry?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockvegas
#43,522
#43,522
AM64 said:
So you're saying she conveniently left them a blank page in the middle of the book so they could forge an entry?
Click to expand...
No ... I have covered this before. All they had to do, was find another copy of that brand of diary, and they all contain blank pages - and have blank pages from the new and unused diary imbedded where they needed them to be in Ashley Biden's diary. This was one component of how the infamous Hitler diary hoax was concocted. You don't remember that? It was big news in the 1980's.
 
#43,523
#43,523
BowlBrother85 said:
No ... I have covered this before. All they had to do, was find another copy of the diary, and they all contain blank pages - and have blank pages imbedded where they needed them to be. This was one component of how the infamous Hitler diary hoax was concocted. You don't remember that? It was big news in the 1980's.
Click to expand...

With today's technology, nobody would notice the rebinding?
 
#43,524
#43,524
AM64 said:
With today's technology, nobody would notice the rebinding?
Click to expand...
You are talking about a damn diary here ... not the latest novel from John Grisham! And who has physically seen the diary outside of the people who want you to believe that it's authentic? You people are gullible.
 
#43,525
#43,525
JOEY’S ALL VOL !!! said:
How in the hell it’s as high as 38% baffles me. Who in their right mind could possibly approve of his job performance? It’s unfathomable to even consider doing so. It’s scary to think that there are that many like EL, TNribs and LG out there roaming free among us.
Click to expand...
People pick a team and then double down. My side good, your side bad. Same way with Trumpsters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top