whodeycin85
3rd grade debating champ!
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 10,809
- Likes
- 11,519
There is no protection and you just admitted this law is targeting a specific group while similar laws already exist. You've also admitted it would be misinterpreted by those charged with upholding the law. How is this still a thing?They are not being enforced equally due the lgbtq protection.....in fact you go to a park, in jeans and sweatshirt and dance sexually at the playground when kids are there...would you get arrested??? Maybe not but take of clothes and you would be...why does a drag person get an excception to doing that
The intent is already clear and you even acknowledge that.Why is this so hard for some to understand,???? After it challenged the court will decide it's intent.. and if the intention is to single out drag then it's bad law...if it's to protect child like the same laws for heterosexual shows then it's needed
Yes an those laws that te supposedThere is no protection and you just admitted this law is targeting a specific group while similar laws already exist. You've also admitted it would be misinterpreted by those charged with upholding the law. How is this still a thing?
So, by your own admission, the laws on the books are sufficient yet aren't enforced. Then there is no need for new laws only people willing to enforce them. That is not a legislative issue. Equal protection applies to everyoneYes an those laws that te supposed
to be equally applied are not...I ad a straight male cannot perform a sexually explicit show in front of children....but put on panties bra and skirt. And suddenly I can because freedom expression??? If you can't see the issue with that there is nothing left to discuss....
I've never been to a drag show, adult themed or not but I can't believe they're much worse than what you can see out at 2' on Old Hickory every weekend and there are kids all around. It's quite a show.
Yes an those laws that te supposed
to be equally applied are not...I ad a straight male cannot perform a sexually explicit show in front of children....but put on panties bra and skirt. And suddenly I can because freedom expression??? If you can't see the issue with that there is nothing left to discuss....
Again the highest ELECTED position ,(by the people of Florida) created a law to close a loop hole that already existing laws were ignoring...you can no longer hide behind a sexual identity..which was what was happening.So, by your own admission, the laws on the books are sufficient yet aren't enforced. Then there is no need for new laws only people willing to enforce them. That is not a legislative issue. Equal protection applies to everyone
Just stick with the law, not hypotheticals
You're being lied to. There is no loophole only unwilling enforcers. If the law exists then enforce it. If not then get rid of it since it's not doing any good.Again the highest ELECTED position ,(by the people of Florida) created a law to close a loop hole that already existing laws were ignoring...you can no longer hide behind a sexual identity..which was what was happening.
The loophole is hiding behind freedom of expression because they are "expressing" themselves, just seem to be happening more and more in the presence of kids...we will have to agree to disagreeYou're being lied to. There is no loophole only unwilling enforcers. If the law exists then enforce it. If not then get rid of it since it's not doing any good.
There is no loophole. They can't hide if the law already exists. You simply have cowards that wasn't to target a specific group because they're scared to do their job. If the act is as illegal as you claim then enforce and fight it in the courts.The loophole is hiding behind freedom of expression because they are "expressing" themselves, just seem to be happening more and more in the presence of kids...we will have to agree to disagree
There is no loophole. They can't hide if the law already exists. You simply have cowards that wasn't to target a specific group because they're scared to do their job. If the act is as illegal as you claim then enforce and fight it in the courts.
Doesn't a bill like this encourage those cowards but knowing that they won't be persecuted for engorcing the law against a minority community??? So even if it gets shot down...maybe those cowards will start enforcing it equally....Im not convinced it'll get thrown out. But I'm curious to watch the hearingsThere is no loophole. They can't hide if the law already exists. You simply have cowards that wasn't to target a specific group because they're scared to do their job. If the act is as illegal as you claim then enforce and fight it in the courts.
If this is such a dire emergency that legislation is required then they should be enforcing the current law already. This is ignorance hiding behind a pen and paperDoesn't a bill like this encourage those cowards but knowing that they won't be persecuted for engorcing the law against a minority community??? So even if it gets shot down...maybe those cowards will start enforcing it equally....Im not convinced it'll get thrown out. But I'm curious to watch the hearings
Ignorance of what?? You already said this bill doesn't express a difference in one sexuality, but applied equally to "male and female impersonators"If this is such a dire emergency that legislation is required then they should be enforcing the current law already. This is ignorance hiding behind a pen and paper