The Problems with Trans-ideology

#654
#654
volgr said:
The public, especially in red states, will largely support this. Drag isnt for kids. You want to do that sh1t, do it behind closed doors. The govt has every right to protect the public square.
Click to expand...
Now you're finally admiring the goal. Doesn't it feel better to not hide anymore?
 
#655
#655
This is like arguing that female performers can perform in public. Ridiculous.
 
#657
#657
volgr said:
The public, especially in red states, will largely support this. Drag isnt for kids. You want to do that sh1t, do it behind closed doors. The govt has every right to protect the public square.
Click to expand...

Screw the public! We are not supposed to be governed by mob rule, individual rights trump society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol
#658
#658
volgr said:
This is like arguing that female performers can perform in public. Ridiculous.
Click to expand...
The act of a man wearing a dress in public should not be illegal and should be protected speech. Multiple ones getting together should be protected assembly. Do you disagree with those?
 
#660
#660
utvolpj said:
The act of a man wearing a dress in public should not be illegal and should be protected speech. Multiple ones getting together should be protected assembly. Do you disagree with those?
Click to expand...

A man can wear a dress and walk down the street, that isnt a drag show.
 
#662
#662
utvolpj said:
The act of a man wearing a dress in public should not be illegal and should be protected speech. Multiple ones getting together should be protected assembly. Do you disagree with those?
Click to expand...
Show me in the bill where it denies that ?
 
#664
#664
volgr said:
A man can wear a dress and walk down the street, that isnt a drag show.
Click to expand...
But can't do a drag show in public no matter how its performed. If you define a drag show as always and 100% sexual then you've essentially banned it and criminalized all performers.
 
#665
#665
"You are only targeting LGBTQ". No, I am for banning all sexually provocative performers in public and in private if children are around. Straight or otherwise. This is no different than most current laws as it deals with adult female performers.
 
#667
#667
volgr said:
It is harming others. Children to be exact. There is nothing more important to protect.
Click to expand...

Seeing someone dressed in drag or even seeing some sexually explicit act isn't harming them. Constant exposure, sure I can buy that but not simply seeing it.

You think a kid seeing some boobs is harmful?
 
#668
#668
utvolpj said:
But can't do a drag show in public no matter how its performed. If you define a drag show as always and 100% sexual then you've essentially banned it and criminalized all performers.
Click to expand...
The bills says adult drag shows....not all drag shows....much like we have shows and then we have adult shows...what's the difference
 
#670
#670
utvolpj said:
But can't do a drag show in public no matter how its performed. If you define a drag show as always and 100% sexual then you've essentially banned it and criminalized all performers.
Click to expand...

You cant differentiate between an Irish step dancer and a drag show performer? Are you that dumb or just being intentionally disingenuous?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
#672
#672
hog88 said:
How do you propose we protect the kids from their parents? Think about it, who's the true "sicko" the performers, the venue owners or the parents that drag their kids to these shows knowing what they will see?
Click to expand...
They are supposed to be protected per current laws, which are not being enforced. So the local population of Florida voted and elected a guy who will enforce the beliefs they constitutionally voted for
 
#673
#673
volgr said:
You cant differentiate between an Irish step dancer and a drag show performer? Are you that dumb or just being intentionally disingenuous?
Click to expand...
the issue is whether there should be a difference under the law
 
#674
#674
utvolpj said:
Pretty sure I called it pandering for its limited scope but believe what you want. Really on topic
Click to expand...

1. Who gaf of the reason if it results in the reduction of barriers to entry.
2. And no it was “what about the children”.

Completely on topic when someone keeps yelling “smal gubmwnt”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
#675
#675
utvolpj said:
Do you believe everyone will agree with that? Every politician, police officer, judge, jury, etc?
Click to expand...
Nope but they should follow laws that are in place...they haven't been...because of SJW and hiding being "protected" statues....problem is we re to fr down the path to not take a hard turn to get back on....our mortality prior to recently has been what separates and guided out country....the morality has been chipped away from that we are closer to communism then a republic anymore...so a hard correction is needed and it's gotta start somewhere
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top