Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

[BowlBrother85]

So an single out cut of Hawley running...along with media commentary about being a coward....when a full footage shows he was last in the group isn't deceptive editing in your mind?

At multiple points, there is security footage shown in the video of this one hearing.

 

[luthervol]

I think you missed the point. But that’s expected

Not in the least. In fact, it's exactly the point I've attempted to make for years.

 

[whodeycin85]

At multiple points, there is security footage shown in the video of this one hearing.

Notice they big white times they put on there for the peaceful parts. Then no time for the violent parts.
.why. Called deceptive editing...making it seem that was the timeframe in which the violence hey were showing was happening.....

 

[BowlBrother85]

That tweet is a lie .... but you get away with it, because none of you watched the hearings. Surveillance video was shown and discussed.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Notice they big white times they put on there for the peaceful parts. Then no time for the violent parts.
.why. Called deceptive editing...making it seem that was the timeframe in which the violence hey were showing was happening.....

I'm not fighting that battle at the moment ... These tweets claiming that the January 6th Committee didn't review any surveillance video are horse $hit.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Not in the least. In fact, it's exactly the point I've attempted to make for years.

You did. If you continue to defend the J6 committee in this thread then you no doubt missed the point.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

That tweet is a lie .... but you get away with it, because none of you watched the hearings. Surveillance video was shown and discussed.

LOL ... It's only a lie bc you say it is. Truth of the facts before you don't lie. You think it is.
You're programmed to be believe the other side is lying when it does not fit your narrative.

 

[luthervol]

I

You did. If you continue to defend the J6 committee in this thread then you no doubt missed the point.

Where did you see me defend the committee. My position has been clearly stated multiple times.
The footage should not have been exclusively released to Fox.

 

[BowlBrother85]

LOL ... It's only a lie bc you say it is. Truth of the facts before you don't lie. You think it is.
You're programmed to be believe the other side is lying when it's does not fit your narrative.

I know it's a lie, because I watched the January 6th hearings last summer. Surveillance video was shown and discussed by the committee during those hearings. That's not my opinion. It's a provable fact. Conservatives are lying to their base, because they know you didn't watch those hearings, so they can get away with it.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[whodeycin85]

I'm not fighting that battle at the moment ... These tweets claiming that the January 6th Committee didn't review any surveillance video are horse $hit.

Lol. So you don't wanna argue the reason why people don't believe what he is saying... And we are thru. Good luck

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

I know it's a lie, because I watched the January 6th hearings last summer. Surveillance video was shown and discussed by the committee during those hearings. That's not my opinion. It's a provable fact. Conservatives are lying to their base, because they know you didn't watch those hearings, so they can get away with it.

Lol ... keep trying to convince us you're right. The Jan 6th Committee was a sham Kangaroo Court spectacle to deceive the country of lies of what truly happened that day. If you like believing their lies & filth go ahead.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Lol. So you don't wanna argue the reason why people don't believe what he is saying... And we are thru. Good luck

At the moment, I'm addressing these asinine tweets claiming the January 6th Committee didn't review ANY surveillance video. Surveillance video was featured in the hearings. Now, I can believe that they didn't review everything ... but to say that they didn't review anything at all is a lie.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

At the moment, I'm addressing these asinine tweets claiming the January 6th Committee didn't review ANY surveillance video. Surveillance video was featured in the hearings. Now, I can believe that they didn't review everything ... but to say that they didn't review anything at all is a lie.

Uh, huh. Keep defending the Democrats lie thing. You do it well. More tweets to come.

 

[TN Ribs]

So an single out cut of Hawley running...along with media commentary about being a coward....when a full footage shows he was last in the group isn't deceptive editing in your mind?

No, it's not deceptive. He raised a fist in solidarity with the stop the steal crowd, once the capitol was breached his solidarity with the crowd disappeared just like his courage.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Where did you see me defend the committee. My position has been clearly stated multiple times.
The footage should not have been exclusively released to Fox.

If it’s just video what does it matter. I’ve seen various companies get exclusives with much more subjective things. Like I said earlier just mute the commentary. And better yet put a piece of tape over the Fox symbol on your screen.

 

[whodeycin85]

At the moment, I'm addressing these asinine tweets claiming the January 6th Committee didn't review ANY surveillance video. Surveillance video was featured in the hearings. Now, I can believe that they didn't review everything ... but to say that they didn't review anything at all is a lie.

I took it as they saw the footage for the first time at the hearing....

 

[whodeycin85]

No, it's not deceptive. He raised a fist in solidarity with the stop the steal crowd, once the capitol was breached his solidarity with the crowd disappeared just like his courage.

So framing him running out by himself as opposed to a group isn't deceptive editing...?

 

[Jxn Vol]

The committee had to review the J6 video so the could carefully edit what they released.

Now defend not turning all video to the defense attorneys.

 

[luthervol]

If it’s just video what does it matter. I’ve seen various companies get exclusives with much more subjective things. Like I said earlier just mute the commentary. And better yet put a piece of tape over the Fox symbol on your screen.

Why did Tucker claim Chansley was allowed to enter when the video evidence (which he refused to show) clearly showed Chansley entering through a broken door?
Why did Tucker withhold that part of the footage?
Why is Tucker intentionally misleading his followers?

That's why it matters.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I took it as they saw the footage for the first time at the hearing....

That could not possibly be true, because Rep. Adam Kinzinger described the surveillance footage to the House Chamber right before it was shown. He obviously knew ahead of time what was on it.






The portion of the hearing that I'm referring to runs from the 1:34:40 to the 1:36:49 mark of the video up above. Will you PLEASE watch it.

 

[TN Ribs]

So framing him running out by himself as opposed to a group isn't deceptive editing...?

No, not in context. He encouraged them and then ran away. The lesson is simple, if you don't want to be shown running away when things turn violent, don't encourage them in the first place. It's his own damn fault.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Why did Tucker claim Chansley was allowed to enter when the video evidence (which he refused to show) clearly showed Chansley entering through a broken door?
Why did Tucker withhold that part of the footage?
Why is Tucker intentionally misleading his followers?

That's why it matters.

I don’t know. I had it muted when I watched the video. See it doesn’t matter.

 

[luthervol]

I don’t know. I had it muted when I watched the video. See it doesn’t matter.

Sure it does, because you didn't see him enter through a broken door. You only saw the "peaceful" parts Tucker wished for you to see.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Sure it does, because you didn't see him enter through a broken door. You only saw the "peaceful" parts Tucker wished for you to see.

No I watched all 44,000 hours on mute.

And it really doesn’t matter what I saw and my opinion on it.

What matters is the defendants didn’t get all the video turned over to them.