37620VOL
Barely-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 7,996
- Likes
- 16,786
Just looked over Bama's schedule and they don't have any good wins. "Body of work" argument fails.
"Close losses" argument would be stronger if they didn't also have very close wins on their record.
I don't think the committee wants to set precedent on "loss of a key player". Even if they did, we mitigated that argument with the destruction of Vandy.
We have the same record. We have much better wins. We have the stronger SOS. One of our losses was to #1 who just won by 20 over the team that beat Bama. Honestly I think OSU should be ahead of Bama.
How will the committee show their work if they leave Bama over the Vols? Or will they choose silence?
"Close losses" argument would be stronger if they didn't also have very close wins on their record.
I don't think the committee wants to set precedent on "loss of a key player". Even if they did, we mitigated that argument with the destruction of Vandy.
We have the same record. We have much better wins. We have the stronger SOS. One of our losses was to #1 who just won by 20 over the team that beat Bama. Honestly I think OSU should be ahead of Bama.
How will the committee show their work if they leave Bama over the Vols? Or will they choose silence?