To Protect and to Serve II

My sarcasm meter is not functioning right now, so I'm not sure if you are being serious. But you have to know the context behind that speech from a few years ago. Go do some research on Joe Gamaldi and the Houston officer shootings. Hell, we talked about it in this thread when it happened.
Yes, I was using sarcasm. I agree with you on probably 99.9% of the idiots that get exposed here. There are too many police that are corrupt and their fellow co-workers cover for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
Yes, I was using sarcasm. I agree with you on probably 99.9% of the idiots that get exposed here. There are too many police that are corrupt and their fellow co-workers cover for them.
My bad. but over the last 2 years, people have really began to expose themselves and reveal a side of them that I would have not imagined in 2019. So when I read something like you posted, my gut might say it is sarcasm, but there is the possibility that you could be dead serious about what you are saying.
 
This was some fine police work right here. The officers pulled over a woman for some sort of road rage incident, and the first one stopped his cruiser on railroad tracks. When they arrested the woman, they handcuffed her and locked in the rear of the cruiser parked on the railroad tracks, and you can guess what happened next. I started the video about where the collision occurred.

 
This was some fine police work right here. The officers pulled over a woman for some sort of road rage incident, and the first one stopped his cruiser on railroad tracks. When they arrested the woman, they handcuffed her and locked in the rear of the cruiser parked on the railroad tracks, and you can guess what happened next. I started the video about where the collision occurred.


WOW... WOW,,, Damn
 
Posting those cameras on private is no different than entering a person’s home without a warrant …. This is a huge infringement…huge
They charged him with illegal baiting also. If that charge was built on video evidence from the camera, that would certainly have to be fruit from a poison tree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
Posting those cameras on private is no different than entering a person’s home without a warrant …. This is a huge infringement…huge
I think I read this case similar to this. The argument was that the cameras were not around the common living areas so they then had the right to place them. I don’t agree with that and neither should any court. The person in question has no trespassing signs everywhere and the game and wildlife agency still placed the cameras. I’ll have to see if I can find it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
I think it will end up in front of the full TN Supreme Court (don't know exactly how that works) but a 3 judge panel struck down TNs Open Fields doctrine. I never have had an issue with a TWRA officer but when I lived in VA the game wardens there treat private property as if they own it all. It's a wonder more of them are not shot.

Judges strike down Tennessee law allowing warrantless searches by state wildlife officials – Tennessee Lookout
Go back to the video I posted yesterday. Instead of mounting cameras, they'll likely go to using drones...
 
Go back to the video I posted yesterday. Instead of mounting cameras, they'll likely go to using drones...

Of course they will. But if it's under 400' over your property and not in an FAA designated glide path it's trespassing and (I think it's far from settled) you have a case to shoot the F'er down. Now mind you, any local or state laws governing the discharge of a firearm would apply and could land you in hot water.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top