Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

#1,177
#1,177
VOLS INC. said:
Click to expand...



That's superficially a good point, but the difference is the reference by the Pelosi attacker to 1/6. The invoking of "Where's Nancy?" while armed with zip ties is a clear allusion back to 1/6 and you would think would perhaps get a few people to realize that Trump's egging on of that crowd, and then doing nothing for 3 + hours while it went on except for watch it gleefully on tv, is a bit of a problem.
 
#1,178
#1,178
lawgator1 said:
That's superficially a good point, but the difference is the reference by the Pelosi attacker to 1/6. The invoking of "Where's Nancy?" while armed with zip ties is a clear allusion back to 1/6 and you would think would perhaps get a few people to realize that Trump's egging on of that crowd, and then doing nothing for 3 + hours while it went on except for watch it gleefully on tv, is a bit of a problem.
Click to expand...

Nope, no problem.
 
#1,179
#1,179
lawgator1 said:
That's superficially a good point, but the difference is the reference by the Pelosi attacker to 1/6. The invoking of "Where's Nancy?" while armed with zip ties is a clear allusion back to 1/6 and you would think would perhaps get a few people to realize that Trump's egging on of that crowd, and then doing nothing for 3 + hours while it went on except for watch it gleefully on tv, is a bit of a problem.
Click to expand...
The difference is most of the MSM, the democrat party they protect, and the sheep that continue to support them would have secretly celebrated Kavanaughs death because they worship the government and the conservative members of the SCOTUS are a threat to our democracy.

Thus the major difference in coverage.


Edit. Congrats on your Governor race! DeSantis is amazing! I’m sure you are thrilled with the continued prosperity he will bring to your great state 😉
 
Last edited:
#1,180
#1,180
How is 1/6 tied to this? Local TV interviews that know this guy have identified him as a progressive.
And really who cares..he has divergent boxed ideological views. A nut. And here we have to fight it because the pols make it so.

Lets see the hammer? Who owned the hammer? So many questions, yet just as the butt sex is speculated, so is all this other crap.
If such an open and closed event, there should be something tangible and more than changing stories and lack of evidence.
 
#1,182
#1,182
Orangeburst said:
How is 1/6 tied to this? Local TV interviews that know this guy have identified him as a progressive.
And really who cares..he has divergent boxed ideological views. A nut. And here we have to fight it because the pols make it so.

Lets see the hammer? Who owned the hammer? So many questions, yet just as the butt sex is speculated, so is all this other crap.
If such an open and closed event, there should be something tangible and more than changing stories and lack of evidence.
Click to expand...
@RockyTop85 you wanna field this? Blaming Jan 6 is more in your wheel house here
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and SpaceCoastVol
#1,184
#1,184
RockyTop85 said:
😂🤣😂🤣

Keep the butt sex hope alive!!
Click to expand...
Ok I crossed up I thought this reply was to me. That reply was one post above.

In answer to that if they try he was 🦇 💩 crazy and listened to the voices in his head that climbed there from social media I don’t see that as conflicting with my assertion he’s simply 🦇 💩 crazy. No rational person listens to social media and comes up with Nancy is the leader of the pack and needs to tell the truth or I’m gonna knee cap her.
 
#1,186
#1,186
lawgator1 said:
That's superficially a good point, but the difference is the reference by the Pelosi attacker to 1/6. The invoking of "Where's Nancy?" while armed with zip ties is a clear allusion back to 1/6 and you would think would perhaps get a few people to realize that Trump's egging on of that crowd, and then doing nothing for 3 + hours while it went on except for watch it gleefully on tv, is a bit of a problem.
Click to expand...


Where’s Nancy is asking where someone is. Stated long before J6 but somehow convinced by the left as new lingo. I bet you said, where’s XYZ before even after J6. MSM got you all in the feels.
 
#1,187
#1,187
NorthDallas40 said:
Ok I crossed up I thought this reply was to me. That reply was one post above.

In answer to that if they try he was 🦇 💩 crazy and listened to the voices in his head that climbed there from social media I don’t see that as conflicting with my assertion he’s simply 🦇 💩 crazy. No rational person listens to social media and comes up with Nancy is the leader of the pack and needs to tell the truth or I’m gonna knee cap her.
Click to expand...

They will say that he is crazy and that being crazy made him more susceptible to taking action based on the things he was reading and sharing on social media.

They will say that because that’s clearly what actually happened.

If you’re saying that doesn’t conflict with your assertion, then I won’t even rag on you for walking back all that bluster from earlier, because you’d actually be correct.
 
#1,188
#1,188
NorthDallas40 said:
Ok I crossed up I thought this reply was to me. That reply was one post above.

In answer to that if they try he was 🦇 💩 crazy and listened to the voices in his head that climbed there from social media I don’t see that as conflicting with my assertion he’s simply 🦇 💩 crazy. No rational person listens to social media and comes up with Nancy is the leader of the pack and needs to tell the truth or I’m gonna knee cap her.
Click to expand...

So we have to take everything at face value because of what the Media and political say? BS.

Tired of this ****. Scalisce is shot and was a Bernie supporter, had a hit list, Dems have occupied state houses, stormed the door of the SCOTUS, had pols on the floor of the House and in the media calling the elections of Republicans fraudulent, called electronic voting fraudulent, and on and on. And we are supposed to believe that they care about 1/6? GTFO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, StarRaider and Franklin Pierce
#1,190
#1,190
RockyTop85 said:
They will say that he is crazy and that being crazy made him more susceptible to taking action based on the things he was reading and sharing on social media.

They will say that because that’s clearly what actually happened.

If you’re saying that doesn’t conflict with your assertion, then I won’t even rag on you for walking back all that bluster from earlier, because you’d actually be correct.
Click to expand...
Lol. I’m glad we agree the primary is is this dude is 🦇 💩 crazy and that’s all on him 😂
 
#1,192
#1,192
Orangeburst said:
So we hear he had zip ties. Maybe he did maybe he didnt.
What else am I missing?
Where's Nancy?
That doesn't mean anything without context.
Click to expand...
All that’s noise. No rational person looks at social media or anything else and decides “yeah Nancy is lying and as leader of the pack needs to tell the truth or I’m gonna knee cap her.” I don’t care if he took a flame thrower or bazooka in there
 
#1,193
#1,193
NorthDallas40 said:
All that’s noise. No rational person looks at social media or anything else and decides “yeah Nancy is lying and as leader of the pack needs to tell the truth or I’m gonna knee cap her.” I don’t care if he took a flame thrower or bazooka in there
Click to expand...

What was your "confession"? I aint digging reading this whole thread..some of us have to work for a living..lol

Ohh..so we have quotes from him already?
 
#1,194
#1,194
Orangeburst said:
What was your "confession"? I aint digging reading this whole thread..some of us have to work for a living..lol

Ohh..so we have quotes from him already?
Click to expand...
I inferred he was saying to go read the accused’s statement to the SFPD that wasn’t at me.

Yes SFPD released an affidavit RT linked to it.

Spoiler: there is no Jan 6 confession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#1,195
#1,195
NorthDallas40 said:
Lol. I’m glad we agree the primary is is this dude is 🦇 💩 crazy and that’s all on him 😂
Click to expand...
Sure, he’s primarily responsible regardless of his mental state unless he’s incompetent, which there is no evidence to support. It seems there is a lot of evidence that he is crazy, possibly a schizoaffective disorder, although “I don’t have expertise in that area”.

85% of the stuff you say on here is just as stupid as his social media, and you’re not even the farthest gone of the Trumpkins, but (I assume) you haven’t acted on it. That distinction is on him.

That doesn’t mean that irresponsible rhetoric isn’t a contributing factor. A concept that you have no trouble applying when it suits you.
 
#1,196
#1,196
RockyTop85 said:
Sure, he’s primarily responsible regardless of his mental state unless he’s incompetent, which there is no evidence to support. It seems there is a lot of evidence that he is crazy, possibly a schizoaffective disorder, although “I don’t have expertise in that area”.

85% of the stuff you say on here is just as stupid as his social media, and you’re not even the farthest gone of the Trumpkins, but (I assume) you haven’t acted on it. That distinction is on him.

That doesn’t mean that irresponsible rhetoric isn’t a contributing factor. A concept that you have no trouble applying when it suits you.
Click to expand...
Yeah that genie isn’t going to go back in the bottle for any of our polits or public figures but as much as you don’t want to believe it, it’s not going to factor in here. We will of course continue to see much wailing and gnashing of teeth that Jan 6 rhetoric caused this, from you too I’m sure, and it’s going to rightly fall on deaf ears.
 
#1,197
#1,197
NorthDallas40 said:
Yeah that genie isn’t going to go back in the bottle for any of our polits or public figures but as much as you don’t want to believe it, it’s not going to factor in here. We will of course continue to see much wailing and gnashing of teeth that Jan 6 rhetoric caused this, from you too I’m sure, and it’s going to rightly fall on deaf ears.
Click to expand...

The fact that it falls on deaf ears around here when republicans do it was exactly the point I was trying to make. But it’s not as much fun when you just admit to it.
 
#1,198
#1,198
NorthDallas40 said:
Yeah that genie isn’t going to go back in the bottle for any of our polits or public figures but as much as you don’t want to believe it, it’s not going to factor in here. We will of course continue to see much wailing and gnashing of teeth that Jan 6 rhetoric caused this, from you too I’m sure, and it’s going to rightly fall on deaf ears.
Click to expand...

Irresponsible rhetoric? How is that even definable?
I hear Congressmen use hyperbolic rhetoric all the time. Throw granny off the cliff, even that Obamacare Congressman that said Republicans want you to doe if or even if you dont have Healthcare, Maxine harass them, etc..
 
#1,199
#1,199
Orangeburst said:
Irresponsible rhetoric? How is that even definable?
I hear Congressmen use hyperbolic rhetoric all the time. Throw granny off the cliff, even that Obamacare Congressman that said Republicans want you to doe if or even if you dont have Healthcare, Maxine harass them, etc..
Click to expand...
For somebody who is pretending to be too dumb to identify irresponsible rhetoric, you seem to have come up with a lot of examples. Beginner’s luck, I’m sure.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top