This article makes it pretty clear that Russia was behind the massacre, even if it didn’t say anything sensational and acknowledged Russia’s denial.Take this article about the Bucha massacre, for example. Guerra en Ucrania: Rusia asegura que las imágenes de la matanza de Bucha son un montaje | Internacional | EL PAÍS (elpais.com)
It's about as even-handed and unbiased as you're going to find regarding the war in Ukraine, which is surprising since it was published in the EU. But it also reports that the Russian government alleges the massacre was staged. The article states only facts: Russian forces are in Ukraine and the Russian government says the massacre in Bucha was staged by the Ukrainians. The article gave no opinions.
The American equivalent would say something like, "The INVADER committed a HOLOCAUST in Bucha!!! Today, the Russian LIARS LIED and SLANDERED the HERO Zelensky by saying it was staged!!!"
This second link is clearly an opinion piece like many we saw prior to the invasion.A really good pre-war article is this one that came out in January predicting a war between the USA and Russia. This journalist really nailed it. ¿Guerra entre Rusia y Estados Unidos? (lavanguardia.com)
It discussed Putin taking over the Crimea being one motivation of the conflict, but it also discussed the Americans expanding NATO, and even mentioned how the USA didn't want the Nordstream 2 pipeline to come online even though it benefited the Germans and Russians. And how these conflicted interests could cause exactly what we've been watching since February. It mainly focuses on the USA vs. Russia as Ukraine is merely the porkchop the two big dogs are fighting over.
Take this article about the Bucha massacre, for example. Guerra en Ucrania: Rusia asegura que las imágenes de la matanza de Bucha son un montaje | Internacional | EL PAÍS (elpais.com)
It's about as even-handed and unbiased as you're going to find regarding the war in Ukraine, which is surprising since it was published in the EU. But it also reports that the Russian government alleges the massacre was staged. The article states only facts: Russian forces are in Ukraine and the Russian government says the massacre in Bucha was staged by the Ukrainians. The article gave no opinions.
The American equivalent would say something like, "The INVADER committed a HOLOCAUST in Bucha!!! Today, the Russian LIARS LIED and SLANDERED the HERO Zelensky by saying it was staged!!!"
A really good pre-war article is this one that came out in January predicting a war between the USA and Russia. This journalist really nailed it. ¿Guerra entre Rusia y Estados Unidos? (lavanguardia.com)
It discussed Putin taking over the Crimea being one motivation of the conflict, but it also discussed the Americans expanding NATO, and even mentioned how the USA didn't want the Nordstream 2 pipeline to come online even though it benefited the Germans and Russians. And how these conflicted interests could cause exactly what we've been watching since February. It mainly focuses on the USA vs. Russia as Ukraine is merely the porkchop the two big dogs are fighting over.
Meanwhile, in the USA, the mainstream news articles are limited to op-ed pieces parroting the government.
Lol at including the US as looking as bad as the other two. At least from what has come up from this conflict.All of the rapes should be mentioned. They happened then, they happen now. Like all wars, this one includes rape. There are reports of Russian troops raping ethnic Ukrainians and Ukrainian troops raping ethnic Russians. Of course, the latter isn't reported in mainstream American media as the reporting on this war is heavily censored in the USA, though to a lesser extent than Germany who actually sentenced a journalist to three years in prison for giving a voice to local residents in the war zone. You pretty much have to go to Rumble or foreign media (not German media, obviously) to access interviews of locals that run counter to the narrative presented in the American media. In countries where freedom of speech and freedom of press are actually practiced instead of boasted about, a more nuanced and accurate picture of the war is presented, with Russia, Ukraine, and the USA all looking like **** in rather equal proportions.
I love that you think you are countering my argument.I don't see this as nothing other than normal warfare. Not sure what the problem is to be honest.
Obviously because to look into the mirror is very hard for most people to do.
At the end of the day this is just normal warfare, if people don't like it... well, too bad.
![]()
I love that you think you are countering my argument.
This is exactly the argument I was making to ND. We are seeing typical warfare with playgrounds getting hit. The rape isnt new, but that doesnt make it ok, and doesnt mean that either side should get away with it.
For some death may be preferable to enslavement under Russia. You wont understand the fight until you understand that.This is why I label the West a death cult. It's not just the fact we havent advocated peace but have gone out of our way to almost ensure the worst possible outcome in Ukraine is achieved. Our Fed Govt is corrupt to its core.
Lol. You all really love talking about Pootin's sack.Of course you don’t buy it Curly you can’t get off Pootin’s sack long enough to even think about it. And absolutely none of the people you are interacting with believe what you’re asserting so deflection denied. And you continue to show you have zero ability to identify or even parse logical fallacies![]()
I'll give Ritter credit, he was right back in early summer when he warned about Ukraine training a large group of troops for a counter offensive. We'll see if he ends up being right here, but I would say this would be worst case scenario for Ukraine and completely plausible considering what Russia is sending into Ukraine and how they will no longer be constrained by the SMO.
Yep. I think RT is currently about the only place that will host his op-Ed’s. Might be some other Russian state media outlets. But due to his repeated pedo issues he’s persona non grata outside of Russian shill sites. And they only put up with him because he’s a token Westerner they can hold up for show. They likely have as much contempt for his pedo ass as everyone else.hes also predicted nothing but doom for ukraine on a daily basis
Medvedev was a placeholder.I was actually thinking about Gorbachev, but I guess he was considered more Soviet than Russian. Don't forget Medvedev had the title for a while, too, after the Soviet breakup - not sure how reasonable he was, but he did seem less thuggish than Putin ... although that's a lot like saying somebody was to the right of Lenin or Stalin.
For some death may be preferable to enslavement under Russia. You wont understand the fight until you understand that.