i have mixed feelings on their comments.
on the one hand, i basically agree with them. i think on a year in, year out basis, w/out stacking top 5 type classes on top of one another for several years in a row, and our current recruiting prowess doesn't change (top 15ish territory), we probably are an 8-4/9-3 program, with the ability to have a 10+ win season every so often. On the other, they're basically saying we're Kentucky.
kind of a good news/bad news deal....good news is, we're waaaay better than we've been the past 15 years, and at least involved in the discussion for SEC title contention on yearly basis. bad news is, the ceiling is made of brick apparently.
in the end, i think as long as we get consistent QB play and we continue to build depth on the defense, TN can be a contender. and i think the analysis they offered assumes all things will always be equal, in terms of GA and Bama always being the elite of the elite, and TN will never recruit consistently enough to truly compete at that level.
sure, they mentioned realignment and the changes coming in the conf, but while doing so, they referenced TX as a program that should assume itself a contender? seriously?
anyway. like i said at the end of the day, i basically agree with them..i think a consistent 8-4/9-3 program that will get 10/11 every so often. which, in reality is what this program has always been. we consistently won more than we lost and went to bowl games. and we consistently would contend for and win conf titles every 3-6 years, until our run from the mid 80's to the early 00's, easily our most consistently successful run since the General.