OrangeTsar
Alabama delenda est
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 22,970
- Likes
- 55,473
The only way I support raising the semiauto ownership age to 21 is if the same change is simultaneously tied to voting age. The two should be constitutionally linked. If you aren’t mature enough to own a common everyday firearm, you aren’t mature enough to pick someone to hold political office. I would argue that in 2020, 81 Million people did. more harm to this country with their votes than 81 million gun owners could even contemplateI never said guns make people want to commit mass murder. Guns are the vessel. That being said, do you think the Uvalde shooting would’ve happened if access to semi-automatics were restricted to 21+ and/or required a background check, waiting period, training courses etc.?
So what do you think needs to be changed? As far as the “gun control” angle goes, I wouldn’t be upset if semi-automatics were restricted to 21+ unless they’re active duty and/or have extended background checks.
Now discuss the White Swiss with their crazy high gun ownership rates. I never felt safer than when I was in Zurich. And no one, even Hitler, had the ball to even seriously think about invading them in Centuries
I never said guns make people want to commit mass murder. Guns are the vessel. That being said, do you think the Uvalde shooting would’ve happened if access to semi-automatics were restricted to 21+ and/or required a background check, waiting period, training courses etc.?
Switzerland has rigid rules regarding ownership of guns and purchasing of ammo iirc. The Swiss also use their tax dollars on themselves, which gives them a higher standard of living. Whereas democrats and republicans just sent $80,000,000,000 to Ukraine.
Background checks are required and the shooter passed a background check. You realize the majority of all gun are semi-automatic weapons right?
But yes. It obviously would have still occurred with a revolver, shotgun, or whatever he could have gotten ahold of.
The swiss standard of living is not due to their tax policies (which are far less progressive than ours, given their middle class pays the highest rate), but rather to their free market. Why do you think the phrase "Swiss bank account exists"?
Also worth noting they have more mass shootings than we do.
I just want to tip my hat to a guy that under stress scored 8 of 10 hits at 40 yards with a handgun. Well done.
Not only does this whole thing kick the hoplophobe's narrative in the plums outright but really twists the knife on this shrill "but...but...an AR is a weapon of WAR! It's practically a weapon of mass destruction!" A civilian with no LEO or military training took out an active shooter with such a weapon in 15 seconds armed only with courage and a Glock.
Right, but what if it required a waiting period, training courses etc.? Can you kill more people quickly with a semi-automatic, pistol or shotgun?
They don’t have more mass shootings. Also another factor of their higher standard of living is due to the fact that they don’t spend their tax dollars on foreign nations/wars like we do.
They’re a conservative country, whereas we are ultra liberal when it comes to international intervention. Even when Trump was in office and a conservative majority, we were still using our tax dollars on attacking Syria and giving Israel billions instead of being conservative with our money.

I just want to tip my hat to a guy that under stress scored 8 of 10 hits at 40 yards with a handgun. Well done.
Not only does this whole thing kick the hoplophobe's narrative in the plums outright but really twists the knife on this shrill "but...but...an AR is a weapon of WAR! It's practically a weapon of mass destruction!" A civilian with no LEO or military training took out an active shooter with such a weapon in 15 seconds armed only with courage and a Glock.
Well thank God you will be compensated for the loss of your loved one killed by that teen driver.Insurance companies account for younger drivers when it comes to calculating their insurance premiums though.
Right, but what if it required a waiting period, training courses etc.? Can you kill more people quickly with a semi-automatic, pistol or shotgun?
They don’t have more mass shootings. Also another factor of their higher standard of living is due to the fact that they don’t spend their tax dollars on foreign nations/wars like we do.
They’re a conservative country, whereas we are ultra liberal when it comes to international intervention. Even when Trump was in office and a conservative majority, we were still using our tax dollars on attacking Syria and giving Israel billions instead of being conservative with our money.
And as the Japanese found out, if someone is really determined enough, they can build one for a single use themselvesBackground checks are required and the shooter passed a background check. You realize the majority of all gun are semi-automatic weapons right?
But yes. It obviously would have still occurred with a revolver, shotgun, or whatever he could have gotten ahold of.
The perp‘s last thoughts were probably along the lines of „this is NOT how I thought this would turn out“. A few more like this and the motivation of copy cats will begin to drop.The best part was that he chased down the shooter who was hurt and trying to hide in a bathroom and ended him on the floor
A waiting period? He didn't buy the guns and then kill people the next day. And training? Why would we want him to be more proficient?
Yeah they do. They're wealthy because they have an extremely free market. Ranked as the 2nd freest in the world. That's why the phrase "Swiss bank account" exists. You won't find a correlation between foreign wars and wealth, but you will between open markets and wealth. The wealthiest countries are the ones with the most open markets. That's why the Swiss are wealthy and why so many other European countries are poor.
View attachment 473941
I’m not sure a psycho would be willing to go through training/certification, whereas now we have a (flawed) background check. I’m not arguing the free market angle either. Switzerland values the free market like we value sending our tax dollars overseas.
Also figure 1 shows America has way more mass shootings compared to other first world countries.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/01924036.2022.2052126?scroll=top&needAccess=true
But the number of historical mass shooting of citizens by the government is quite low here compared to some other „First World“ counties FWIWI’m not sure a psycho would be willing to go through training/certification, whereas now we have a (flawed) background check. I’m not arguing the free market angle either. Switzerland values the free market like we value sending our tax dollars overseas.
Also figure 1 shows America has way more mass shootings compared to other first world countries.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/01924036.2022.2052126?scroll=top&needAccess=true
So would you tell the parents of the murdered children in Uvalde that our system is working perfectly and nothing needs to be changed?
So why does America have more mass shooters than any other developed country? I’m not saying it’s the guns, but there’s clearly something or multiple things in the American fabric that are causing psychos to grab powerful weapons and murder innocent people.
