Roe vs Wade Overturned

#953
#953
zeppelin128 said:
The state of Tennessee is free to **** all over your rights, but you are free to move. Those people that can't afford to move, well "lol **** them", too bad. Or stay, while the state treats you as a second class citizen. What will come down the pike is the epitome of control.
Click to expand...
So now you have finally moved to the state level in terms of rights. Good job. Now show me where a right to an abortion is actually a right?

And do you really feel like you will need one in the future? Or is this just a hill to die on?
 
#959
#959
happy-go_vol said:
So we define a woman a woman when they want to kill a baby, but a woman can't be defined for other things. Can you leftists not see how stupid you guys are? A know double standards have been pride for the left, but my goodness.
Click to expand...
Not to mention if they are happy about the baby, show you pictures of the ultrasound pics at 8 weeks and even tell you the babies potential names, we are to treat that baby like a baby. If she were to lose that baby, please mourn with her.

But if she aborts the baby at 8 weeks, it wasn’t a baby anyway. Just a clump of cells that she had every right to abort. Why mourn? Nothing actually died.

This is the problem, among many, with living in a world where everyone “lives their truth”. The end result is truth does not exist. Reality is not real. And this🫃 is a thing
 
  • Like
Reactions: loggervol and Bassmaster_Vol
#961
#961
zeppelin128 said:
Aside from gun control, last I checked liberals aren't trying to deny rights to people. Conservatives are the ones using the power of their governments to do that. They will go on and on about freedom and liberty, then immediately turn around and **** all over that. They want rights and freedom for themselves while stomping on anyone outside their group.
Click to expand...

Oh come on Zep .. aside from one right , liberals aren’t trying to take anyones rights . You have a liberal President saying he wants to take away a right ( that using the highest federal power of the government ) he also stated that he was considering trying to use EOs to block any SCOTUS he didn’t think was right . That’s pure banana republic sh!t there . A constitutional right is a right is a right .. one isn’t any different than another .
 
#969
#969
southgatevol said:
Or the correction of prior judicial activism?
Click to expand...

Thanks for that short succinct rebuttal. There is a difference between following the rules in the constitution vs making up law to fit the leftist agenda at the time.

You know there are people who actually think the bible today means something different than it did centuries ago because times have changed.

BreatheUT approved
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and Orangeslice13
#971
#971
Septic said:
You're more naïve than I thought if you don't believe that these justices didn't know what they were doing and the ramifications of taking up and overturning established law. You're being disingenuous in the conversation if you don't think the fight for SC Justices by Presidents and the Senate confirmers isn't anything but a path to legislative change.

Gloat over R v W, to the winner go the spoils - but don't embarrass yourself by acting like this isn't judicial activism.
Click to expand...
Scroll back a couple of pages and read the article on RBG and Roe v Wade and give me your thoughts please. I’ll just leave it at that request and not prime the pump
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top