Gun control debate (merged)

[luthervol]

Makes some interesting points......at least to the rational and reasonable.

Got no response on this one.
Guns are more heavily regulated and controlled on a marine base and than in the general public.....Curious.

 

[C-south]

220 CEOs demand immediate action from the Senate to reduce gun violence - CNN
More than 200 business leaders, representing employees in all 50 states, sent a joint letter to the Senate on Thursday, demanding "bold urgent action" to address gun violence in the wake of the killing of 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas last month.

Getting close to the point where being anti gun control will make you unelectable in most places.

250 million people demand CEOs lower prices instead of raising them due to the inept morons you elected.

 

[C-south]

Got no response on this one.
Guns are more heavily regulated and controlled on a marine base and than in the general public.....Curious.

You have never served so you don’t have a clue how it works.

 

[0nelilreb]

They think the pro gun regulation crowd may be successful?

They ,we, I, them … do not trust politicians to not **** us over and “ infringe “ upon our rights . groups and progressives that chip and erode away at our rights until you do something stupid like cancel the filibuster in the senate to push your agenda through before being voted out in mid terms . That’s why propaganda pushes up firearm sells .

 

[hog88]

And I care about your opinion even less than you care about mine.
The point is, when a strong anti gun regulation stance makes you unelectable, you will see politicians fleeing from the anti gun regulation stance. We are moving there ever so slowly.

I guess we'll see this fall.

 

[0nelilreb]

Got no response on this one.
Guns are more heavily regulated and controlled on a marine base and than in the general public.....Curious.

Everything you can name is more heavily regulated on every military base than in the public … next goofy article

 

[LouderVol]

Close, but the gun nuts are even dumber. You could actually see empty toilet paper shelves and it's something needed on a daily basis.

This regulations would lead to empty shelves. All being empty. Forever. And further, people wanting stuff on shelves would be criminals at worst and outcasts at best. But I guess that's the unity you want.

 

[C-south]

And I care about your opinion even less than you care about mine.
The point is, when a strong anti gun regulation stance makes you unelectable, you will see politicians fleeing from the anti gun regulation stance. We are moving there ever so slowly.

There’s an amendment to cure that.

 

[OrangeTsar]

I think of Beto in the same light as I think of fly. Never wanted but a nuisance that’s always buzzing in your face.

No such person as Beto anyhow. Call him Francis like his parents intended

 

[luthervol]

You have never served so you don’t have a clue how it works.

He did. And he seemed to have a clue. In fact, I think he said he was a fire arm instructor in the marines.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

God bless the 2nd Amendment. Working just as the founders intended it.

Another gun free zone making it safe for criminals to cause harm!

 

[luthervol]

They ,we, I, them … do not trust politicians to not **** us over and “ infringe “ upon our rights . groups and progressives that chip and erode away at our rights until you do something stupid like cancel the filibuster in the senate to push your agenda through before being voted out in mid terms . That’s why propaganda pushes up firearm sells .

Because they believe it may be successful?

 

[luthervol]

Everything you can name is more heavily regulated on every military base than in the public … next goofy article

Why is that?
The people risking their lives to protect our freedoms deserve fewer freedoms themselves?

 

[hog88]

Because they believe it may be successful?

Yes, people believe that this administration and congress is capable of passing another unconstitutional piece of legislation that will take years for the Supreme Court to overrule.

 

[luthervol]

There’s an amendment to cure that.

An amendment is not needed.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

 

[hog88]

Why is that?
The people risking their lives to protect our freedoms deserve fewer freedoms themselves?

You don't even have a clue how dumb you sound do you?

 

[luthervol]

Yes, people believe that this administration and congress is capable of passing another unconstitutional piece of legislation that will take years for the Supreme Court to overrule.

Thank you.

 

[C-south]

He did. And he seemed to have a clue. In fact, I think he said he was a fire arm instructor in the marines.

Lol. Is that the tranny “health secretary”?

 

[CagleMtnVol]

This is one example of why everyone should be carrying. You never know when you may need it!

 

[C-south]

An amendment is not needed.

You are absolutely correct.

 

[luthervol]

You don't even have a clue how dumb you sound do you?

I go under the general assumption that I sound half as dumb as you.

 

[hog88]

Thank you.

You're very welcome. It's sad that so many people have so little faith in this congress and administration to stay within constitutional boundaries.

 

[C-south]

I go under the general assumption that I sound half as dumb as you.

No you just sound dumb. Maybe half as dumb as the guy you voted for.

 

[luthervol]

You're very welcome. It's sad that so many people have so little faith in this congress and administration to stay within constitutional boundaries.

But it seems as if every time gun regulation has ever been discussed, gun nuts go on a buying frenzy.

Kind of hard to pin it on Biden and this congress.