War in Ukraine

#34,627
#34,627
MontyPython said:
Wrong.

Ukraine took back at least half of city yesterday. Purportedly using tunnel systems.

Oh and the Russian General in charge of all troops in Donbas? Fired.

Russia is likely close to culminating. Purportedly bringing up reserves at Severodonetsk to bolster front line troops.
Click to expand...
The fact that after 100 days Russia can't even get firm control on area they have had their grubby hands on since 2014 is eye opening at how bad their military is. And to think they believe they could go toe to toe with NATO. HAHAHAHAHA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, 615vols, tbh and 3 others
#34,628
#34,628
Hunerwadel said:
The fact that Ukraine is standing strong today against the second most powerful army in the world has pretty much debunked your claims.
Click to expand...
Russia still doesn't have air superiority. They are a pathetic military who had their bluff called and are now the laughing stock (and pariah) of the 1st world. I'm sure they will take comfort knowing that the third world still believes in them..haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 615vols, tbh, Septic and 4 others
#34,632
#34,632
Septic said:
The "claims" you pootin sycophants have been floating since day one were and are throughly dismantled - daily. The arguments you and your nutty sympathizers trot out are generally supported by a few twitter accounts that have peddle the same ridiculous narrative.

It's hilarious that y'all keep posting sh*t from these twitters expecting to convince anyone of anything.
Click to expand...
1. Where have I posted anything from Twitter?

2. You and your crew of Ukrainian bots are constantly posting links from Twitter. But I guess their links are legit right LMAO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
#34,633
#34,633
volgr said:
I always enjoy reading what is going on in Ukraine from reliable sources, then coming over here and seeing what the fake news propaganda is feeding you guys.
Click to expand...

I hope you enjoy watching Russia go in reverse once their artillery gets whacked.

Clock is ticking...
 
#34,634
#34,634
twitter is just a face page at this point. All the good stuff is happening behind the curtains in private chats and newer socials that I refuse to take part in. There are still a lot of good active members who have gotten a lot smarter about how they spread information due to the russian war barbarians.
 
#34,639
#34,639
Per NBC:

Russia throwing 'all its reserves' at Severodonetsk

After Ukraine’s military recaptured parts of Severodonetsk in recent days, Luhansk Gov. Serhiy Haidai said Saturday that the Russian army had regrouped and was “throwing all its efforts, all its reserves” at the city.

Speaking on Ukrainian television, Haidai said that Russian troops were blowing up bridges across the Siverskyi Donets River in a bid to prevent reinforcements from entering the city.

For both sides, the fighting in the east in recent weeks has been one of the deadliest phases of the war. Ukraine has said it is losing 60 to 100 soldiers every day.

Per Al Jazeera:

Haidai said the progress made in the past two days shows that Ukraine may be able to hold off the Russian attack for that duration, the timeframe for the arrival of new, advanced Western weapons.

“As soon as we get a big amount of Western long-range weapons, we will push their artillery back … and then Russian infantry will run,” he said referring to the new arms aid announced by the Western allies.
 
Last edited:
#34,643
#34,643
What do they mean by "war of attrition"?

Western Backers Of Ukraine Must Persist For 'Long Haul War Of Attrition': NATO Chief | ZeroHedge

He made the comments just after meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House. "We just have to be prepared for the long haul," Stoltenberg said, adding ominously, "Because what we see is that this war has now become a war of attrition."

The NATO chief emphasized that Ukrainians are "paying a high price for defending their own country on the battlefield, but also we see that Russia is taking high casualties."

"Most wars - also, most likely this war - will at some stage end at the negotiating table, but what we know is that what happens around the negotiating table is very closely linked to the situation on the ground, on the battlefield," he explained.
 
#34,644
#34,644
Rasputin_Vol said:
What do they mean by "war of attrition"?

Western Backers Of Ukraine Must Persist For 'Long Haul War Of Attrition': NATO Chief | ZeroHedge

He made the comments just after meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House. "We just have to be prepared for the long haul," Stoltenberg said, adding ominously, "Because what we see is that this war has now become a war of attrition."

The NATO chief emphasized that Ukrainians are "paying a high price for defending their own country on the battlefield, but also we see that Russia is taking high casualties."

"Most wars - also, most likely this war - will at some stage end at the negotiating table, but what we know is that what happens around the negotiating table is very closely linked to the situation on the ground, on the battlefield," he explained.
Click to expand...
I’ll translate. Your home boy Pootin and his Keystone Cops military are so damn incompetent that they couldn’t steam roll an obviously overmatched opponent and now simply can only keep pounding their face against the defenders fist. You’re welcome Moe 🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, FLVOL_79, tvolsfan and 1 other person
#34,647
#34,647
Rasputin_Vol said:
What do they mean by "war of attrition"?

Western Backers Of Ukraine Must Persist For 'Long Haul War Of Attrition': NATO Chief | ZeroHedge

He made the comments just after meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House. "We just have to be prepared for the long haul," Stoltenberg said, adding ominously, "Because what we see is that this war has now become a war of attrition."

The NATO chief emphasized that Ukrainians are "paying a high price for defending their own country on the battlefield, but also we see that Russia is taking high casualties."

"Most wars - also, most likely this war - will at some stage end at the negotiating table, but what we know is that what happens around the negotiating table is very closely linked to the situation on the ground, on the battlefield," he explained.
Click to expand...

I'll speculate on the answer. Russia started with a huge equipment advantage. The advantage is narrowing. Russia is bring out old tanks because they can't build more modern ones fast enough, if at all. The West is continuing to supply Ukraine. Longer range missiles are a recent example. Can Ukraine hold out long enough for the balance of equipment to shift? Can Russia wear Ukraine down before that happens? As Russia takes territory, are they sacrificing so much capability that they are weakened in comparison to Ukraine?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, tvolsfan and NorthDallas40
#34,648
#34,648
MontyPython said:
Per NBC:

Russia throwing 'all its reserves' at Severodonetsk

After Ukraine’s military recaptured parts of Severodonetsk in recent days, Luhansk Gov. Serhiy Haidai said Saturday that the Russian army had regrouped and was “throwing all its efforts, all its reserves” at the city.

Speaking on Ukrainian television, Haidai said that Russian troops were blowing up bridges across the Siverskyi Donets River in a bid to prevent reinforcements from entering the city.

For both sides, the fighting in the east in recent weeks has been one of the deadliest phases of the war. Ukraine has said it is losing 60 to 100 soldiers every day.

Per Al Jazeera:

Haidai said the progress made in the past two days shows that Ukraine may be able to hold off the Russian attack for that duration, the timeframe for the arrival of new, advanced Western weapons.

“As soon as we get a big amount of Western long-range weapons, we will push their artillery back … and then Russian infantry will run,” he said referring to the new arms aid announced by the Western allies.
Click to expand...

Pardon me for stating this, and I hope I'm beyond dead wrong. However, in view of Poot-Poot destroying the rail lines, the Ukies might bot get the new weapons shipment. At least not in time to do anything much with them. The West should have sent these long range weapons long ago when requested. Given that the West is too cowardly to speed things up by sending them via fighter escorted and anti-missile protected cargo plane, sadly, the gig might well finally be up for the staunch Ukies.
 
#34,649
#34,649
WoodsmanVol said:
Pardon me for stating this, and I hope I'm beyond dead wrong. However, in view of Poot-Poot destroying the rail lines, the Ukies might bot get the new weapons shipment. At least not in time to do anything much with them. The West should have sent these long range weapons long ago when requested. Given that the West is too cowardly to speed things up by sending them via fighter escorted and anti-missile protected cargo plane, sadly, the gig might well finally be up for the staunch Ukies.
Click to expand...
Rail lines have been hit since day 1 of the war. There is plenty of information showing they get repaired in hours due to their critical nature in supporting the war effort.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top