tvolsfan
VN GURU
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 40,010
- Likes
- 13,074
Jesus someone is really channeling their inner Zhukov here.
Mauripol is directly on the border, kiev is more than 200 miles away. They were literally able to land attack Mauripol from day one, with no logistical issues. They got somewhat near Kiev in a two weeks, and then sat there for a month. So the evidence points to logistics being a factor. As easy as it was for Russia to resupply and reinforce its forces in Mauripol, it would be that easy for Ukraine to do the same in Kiev. And we already saw the Russians struggle with supplying their push on Kiev, just like we saw Ukraine struggle to supply Mauripol. So the russians would lose their big advantage, and hand it to the Ukrainians in an attack on Kiev.
Mauripol had a population of 440k, Kiev 2,884k. So 6x the size. Did russia have a force 6x what they used on Mauripol to take Kiev? If it took 6x as long to fall as Mauripol it would be almost three times the length of the Battle of Stalingrad. That points to it being a very sizable fight for anyone.
Beyond being able to get new troops and supplies easier at Mauripol than they would at Kiev they were fighting from friendly territory, prepared positions. So if a unit was badly hurt or needed to resupply or rest, they wouldnt have to pull back far, and they could do so to prepared positions, making it easier to accommodate the logistics, speeding up their attacks. At kiev they would have to push farther, into enemy territory, not have prepared positions to resupply or rest from. And likely this would require them having to cycle units from further back from the front lines which complicates things as well.
Basically Mauripol was as good of an attacking posistion as Russia was going to get, and as bad for Ukraine as it was going to get. Kiev may not be the complete opposite, but it would be a significant swing that would favor the Ukrianians. Would it matter in the end? Idk. But there are plenty of military reasons to see a difference in the Russians taking Mauripol vs Kiev.
Your ignorance really is astounding.No ding dong, because Ukraine hasn't invaded a sovereign country under the dumbass premise of Nazi liberation while LEVELING everything it's path.
Read that last sentence again and stop trying to equivocate that with Ukraine fighting Russian sponsored terrorists.
My god. It's shocking how desperate you must be to reconcile that the murder of ten's of thousands of civilians is justified.
It's not that people in here are inherently uncivil and that's why you can't get an honest debate - it's that your points are inherently and fundamentally flawed from the outset and more deserving of ridicule that debate.
You keep blaming the western media but I don't need that or to point out that the russian media is full of sh*t to know that this aggression in Ukraine is unjustified on its face. It only takes common sense, something that you seemingly are short on.
Your ignorance really is astounding.
It's funny I tried earlier this afternoon to have a civil discussion and shared a video discussing Alexander Dugin who is supposedly influential to Putin. Then shared 2 videos discussing the roots of the conflict back in 2014. What happens? A few of the hens were let loose out of the hen house. The timing was rather convenient.
People like you are only interested in hearing your side of the story. No wonder you approve of Zelensky's recent totalitarian tactics.
You’re absolutely clueless. I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 but I did in 2020. And I voted for W both times. Probably wouldn’t vote for either one now but that shouldn’t be an issue. So once again you come across like a complete idiot.One of them liked your post
I wasn't referring to you LMAO. Calm down Proctor.You’re absolutely clueless. I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 but I did in 2020. And I voted for W both times. Probably wouldn’t vote for either one now but that shouldn’t be an issue. So once again you come across like a complete idiot.
Now where is the rest of your damn list, Stooge. You’re O fer right now
Save yourself the trouble. They will ignore it.I'll say it once again. Lavrov explained it in the interview I posted as to why the Russian government expected payments to be made in rubles. I'll probably post that again and provide the minute and second mark where he explains this to make it easier for this crew to look up.
Look at that thread I made about the Summit of Americas. I think these weak azz s^^thole countries see an opening, also. So it isn't just Russia.Putin said a month or so ago that the next 12-18 months would be hard. A strong Ruble however, will most definitely aid them during this transition period. What will also aid them is a growing anti-West sentiment among the populace.
In what could be a prelude to an expansion, a separate session in a “BRICS Plus” format was held on Friday evening within the framework of the virtual BRICS Foreign Ministers’ meeting hosted by China. The countries represented at the meeting were Argentina, Egypt, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Senegal and Thailand.
The BRICS members have backed the broad Chinese suggestion for an expansion of the bloc, but an agreement on the names of the countries may be subject to protracted negotiations. A joint statement by the BRICS Foreign Ministers said they needed to clarify relevant guiding principles, standards and procedures before undertaking any expansion.
China's coal imports from Russia nearly doubled between March and April, reaching 4.42 million metric tons, according to trade data from Refinitiv. Russia has overtaken Australia as China's second biggest supplier since last year and now accounts for 19% of its coal imports, up from the 14% share it had in March.
"Otherwise, there's no logic: on the one hand, insane sanctions are being imposed against us, on the other hand, they are demanding food supplies. Things don't work like that, we're not idiots," said Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council.
"Countries importing our wheat and other food products will have a very difficult time without supplies from Russia. And on European and other fields, without our fertilizers, only juicy weeds will grow," added Medvedev, who served as president between 2008 and 2012.