Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
#146,330
#146,330
Neyland Law Vol said:
The article says rather go after the kids or the collective they will punish the school for failing to stop it, because it’s most likely they lose a law suit by a kid over eligibility or by a collective under the state law. But since the school is a “member” of the NCAA as an organization, the schools must follow the NCAAs own rules as part of the membership obligation. What makes me think we will be a target is they keep saying “colectives that signed deals with recruits before they sign scholarship papers” are what they plan to punish (I.e. Nico)
Click to expand...

Good luck with that! They can’t sit on the sidelines for years, let it happen, and then all of sudden decide to enforce random bylaws. I was in support of how Plowman handled Pruitt. But for this…screw them. They can’t do ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, VolsDoc81TX, Ulysees E. McGill and 2 others
#146,332
#146,332
Neyland Law Vol said:
Surprised you guys aren’t discussing this more. This is the battle. They are targeting us.
Click to expand...

Lol so ridiculous, what is their definition of a booster? Are all alumni boosters? Or are they people who have given money to the university. Spyre is run by alumni of UT but I wouldn’t consider them boosters…regardless they are are trying to bring back the old way of money under the table to get high school recruits and it is wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, VOLSONLY, Ulysees E. McGill and 2 others
#146,336
#146,336
Voltime123 said:
Lol so ridiculous, what is their definition of a booster? Are all alumni boosters? Or are they people who have given money to the university. Spyre is run by alumni of UT but I wouldn’t consider them boosters…regardless they are are trying to bring back the old way of money under the table to get high school recruits and it is wrong
Click to expand...
Where is Danny White standing up for us?
 
#146,337
#146,337
Voltime123 said:
Lol so ridiculous, what is their definition of a booster? Are all alumni boosters? Or are they people who have given money to the university. Spyre is run by alumni of UT but I wouldn’t consider them boosters…regardless they are are trying to bring back the old way of money under the table to get high school recruits and it is wrong
Click to expand...

we should be ok
 
  • Like
Reactions: csprig9
#146,342
#146,342
Neyland Law Vol said:
The article says rather go after the kids or the collective they will punish the school for failing to stop it, because it’s most likely they lose a law suit by a kid over eligibility or by a collective under the state law. But since the school is a “member” of the NCAA as an organization, the schools must follow the NCAAs own rules as part of the membership obligation. What makes me think we will be a target is they keep saying “colectives that signed deals with recruits before they sign scholarship papers” are what they plan to punish (I.e. Nico)
Click to expand...
The NCAA can’t do anything about a high schooler signing a deal with a collective to endorse their products. Minors are making all kinds of money these days through all sorts of avenues. Whose to say Nico isn’t a social media influencer being paid by advertisers? The cats out of the bag. You can’t retroactively enforce rules that were never there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, DarthVol1 and volsfan_17
#146,348
#146,348
Neyland Law Vol said:
The article says rather than goafter the kids or the collective they will punish the school for failing to stop it, because it’s most likely they lose a law suit by a kid over eligibility or by a collective under the state law. But since the school is a “member” of the NCAA as an organization, the schools must follow the NCAAs own rules as part of the membership obligation. What makes me think we will be a target is they keep saying “colectives that signed deals with recruits before they sign scholarship papers” are what they plan to punish (I.e. Nico)
Click to expand...
If they go after schools, schools will simply dissolve the NCAA. Especially if they are selective. Nick Saban openly bragged about BY making 7 figures. TAMU just bought the best class ever. I don't see how they could single us out. And collectives seem to be the model schools are following. Despite all of Nick's bitching, Bama has a collective. IMO, this is all a lot of hot air. I'll believe something will happen when it actually happens, because if they come after us, I expect a strong response from the university.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, VolsDoc81TX, OrangeGlasses731 and 4 others
#146,350
#146,350
Neyland Law Vol said:
The article says rather than goafter the kids or the collective they will punish the school for failing to stop it, because it’s most likely they lose a law suit by a kid over eligibility or by a collective under the state law. But since the school is a “member” of the NCAA as an organization, the schools must follow the NCAAs own rules as part of the membership obligation. What makes me think we will be a target is they keep saying “colectives that signed deals with recruits before they sign scholarship papers” are what they plan to punish (I.e. Nico)
Click to expand...
How can the NCAA make a school responsible for a private business? Make that make sense?
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top