FLVOL_79
GS-16 Classified
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 48,289
- Likes
- 71,678
You have to admit, that if the Russian people are buying this tripe - Russian's are the best in the business when it comes to disinformation.
I read an article the other day that said that Pootin isn't looking to gin up support for his war. Instead he's just pumping out nutty stuff infused with plausible explanations, whether or not it's true doesn't matter..... It's all with the goal of creating murkiness and confusion. He want's to appear to be the "leader" that people can turn to and who can sort through the murkiness he intentionally created. The people get tired of trying to make sense of it - so they start believing the guy who has been there for them.
If it works, it's genius. But the system relies on truth being kept from the masses - the plan falls apart if the Russian people get wind of it and wise up.
Finlands PM is easy on the eyes.
![]()
There it is.
In the event that Ukraine boots Russia completely out of its original territory, there is a 0.0% chance that Putin would remain in power. This begs the question whether this is something the US would like to see happen politically, because if Putin reads the tea leaves of such a huge loss, would he resort to tactical nukes? I think it's a real possibility, as Putin would likely take a dirt nap with a straight-on loss to Ukraine.
They look nothing alike100% correct.
Marjorie Greene is Lee Corso's evil twin brother.
View attachment 452783
View attachment 452784
An alternate meaning might be that he has Crimea but can't have any more. I didn't see it but it would be interesting to know what he meant.I wish I could find the video of Biden a few weeks ago, but he said something to affect that Putin wasn't going to get anymore of Ukraine. I took it as the losses that have already happen is acceptable. Nothing like what Zelensky said posted today. I've looked for video and can't find it, seen it on Neil Cavuto.
@volgr This Bud's for you!
A Super-Short Guide to Why Ukraine is Kicking Russia’s Ass in Putin’s Ukraine War
April 30, 2022 Brian E. Frydenborg
A quick-and-dirty brief on why Zelensky’s Ukraine is winning so handily and Putin’s Russia losing so badly on the battlefield
SILVER SPRING—Below is a breakdown of some of the major aspects of why Ukrainian military forces are performing so much better on the battlefield than Russian military forces.
The Ukrainian Military’s Clear Advantages Over the Russian Military
Versus their Russian foes, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are in a much better overall position and of a much higher quality even though Russia has more and heavier weapons platforms such as tanks, artillery, planes, helicopters, and naval ships (I have explained away that last one already).
Ukraine actually has more troops. Far more. There is no shortage of Ukrainians willing to fight for Ukraine; at some points, there have been more volunteers than Ukraine has been able to accommodate, and large numbers of Ukrainians living abroad have been returning home to fight. So Russia is trying to carry out an offensive against what is actually a numerically superior force. Not a good strategy at all.
Ukraine’s individual troops are by far better equipped and supplied. They often have weapons that can easily knock out any Russian vehicles (and even, sometimes, Russian aircraft), more body armor, more night-vision goggles. No wonder the Russians are constantly getting beat when they engage in firefights.
Ukrainian forces have far higher morale. I have discussed how insanely poorly led, ill-equipped, ill-supplied, ill-trained, and ill-informed Russian soldiers in this war generally are. They are losing or stagnating everywhere they are fighting. And many of them have died, many more seeing their comrades die. Instead of “leaving no man behind,” the Russians frequently abandon their dead and wounded, so disorderly are many of their retreats. In contrast, it seems Ukraine has suffered far fewer losses, but while the Russians have died for just about nothing, Ukrainians are sacrificing for a very successful effort thus far. Their morale is high and they are passionately willing to freely defend their homes and families and fellow Ukrainians, which cannot be said to be the same for the Russians.
Ukrainians are fighting on home turf. Often, units in a particular area are from that area. They often know the terrain intimately, whereas the Russians do not. The advantages that play out on the battlefield from this are numerous, resulting in better intelligence and fewer losses for Ukrainians, more losses for Russians, more efficient operations for Ukrainians, slower operations for Russians.
Ukraine’s logistics and far better and far simpler. Unlike Russia, which has terrible logistics and needs to resupply or reinforce from Russia or the parts of Ukraine it occupied before February 24, Ukrainians are fighting often where they can easily bring in fresh supplies, new equipment and weapons coming in from the West, and their own reinforcements and new recruits. As they are often supplying themselves with interior lines, their supplies and troops need to traverse far smaller distances than Russian supplies and troops. In part as a result of that, those Russian supplies and troops are exposed to Ukrainian units that know their own home turf, resulting in those Russian supplies and convoys often being destroyed or ambushed before they can reach their final destination. And the next point greatly enhances this point…
Ukraine has a lot of help coming in, increasing help, from the rest of the world (Russia does not). Recently, this has included MiG aircraft parts that are significantly increasing the number of planes Ukraine can get into the sky. But it is also increasingly including heavy weapons like tanks (better than what the Russians have) and artillery (also better than what the Russians have), so much so that U.S. defense officials at the Pentagon now estimate Ukrainians actually have more operable tankss in Ukraine than the Russians, and these newest heavy weapons are already having an impact.