War in Ukraine

#28,526
#28,526
Russia's state TV tells viewers 'we're all going to die someday': Nuclear war is 'most probable outcome', viewers are told, 'but we will go to heaven while they simply croak'

Vladimir Putin will launch an all-out nuclear war on the West rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, Russia's chief propagandists have declared, in just the latest chilling threat coming from Moscow.

Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster RT and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin pressing the red button is 'more probable' than the idea that he will allow Russia to lose the war.

'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts. I think World War Three is more realistic, knowing us, knowing our leader.

'The most incredible outcome, that all this will end with a nuclear strike, seems more probable to me than the other course of events.

'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'

57146693-10762143-image-a-6_1651130564481.jpg

Russia has already resorted to indiscriminate attacks on civilians, but has so-far avoided using nuclear or chemical weapons which the West has said would provoke a response

Ukraine war: Russian state TV says nuclear strike 'more probable' than losing | Daily Mail Online
 
#28,535
#28,535
landscapingvol said:
Is this where we pretend that Russia is the victim here and they didn't really invade Ukraine, aren't killing innocent people?
Click to expand...

This is where rational people with an IQ higher than yours realize Russia isn't the only to blame in this fiasco and the West (mostly the US) shares in a large portion of that blame.
 
#28,538
#28,538
LouderVol said:
But the Russians(putin) made that decision for them, because he was never going to honor a truly independent nation on his border. He only wants puppets on his border.
Click to expand...

Yeah, China, Poland, Finland, Norway, North Korea, etc...all puppets to Putin, huh? You might want to re-think your theory.
 
#28,539
#28,539
tvolsfan said:
No, that list is a LOT longer.
Click to expand...

Unless the Roman legions circa Julius Caesar, Mongol hordes, British armies circa the 18th century, Alexander's Greek armies, or German panzer units under Rommel are still roaming the Earth then few if any others could lecture us on military supremacy. I might would add the French under Napoleon and Hannibal's Carthegian armies to that list as well but that aren't many who could rival the US military post the middle of 1944 in terms of military might.
 
#28,541
#28,541
At least some of the propaganda mouthpieces are at least starting to let the public in on a little truth. As I have said, Ukraine is irrelevant in all this and has been. It's always been about NATO and Russia.
 
#28,542
#28,542
volgr said:
Yeah, China, Poland, Finland, Norway, North Korea, etc...all puppets to Putin, huh? You might want to re-think your theory.
Click to expand...

China and North Korea were pretty stupid responses by you. I would say the Poles have had a pretty checkered past with the Russians so I am not sure about that. Norway and Finland aren't exactly military juggernauts but I get your point. Poland as we know it has also only existed for a handful of decades so I would give that one a few more years before I declare Russia's acceptance of their existence. It wasn't that long ago that the Soviets had their way with Poland on two separate occasions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#28,544
#28,544
volgr said:
Don't get cold feet now, the Cokehead Cowboy needs it and he needs it NOW!!
Click to expand...
Thanks for playing the coke head clown play. You were so close to having a point on spending Larry sooooo close. But as usual the clown move to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They should have sprinkled a few Sims game CD’s into the altered video to give it more credibility 😂🤡
 
#28,545
#28,545
landscapingvol said:
Unless the Roman legions circa Julius Caesar, Mongol hordes, British armies circa the 18th century, Alexander's Greek armies, or German panzer units under Rommel are still roaming the Earth then few if any others could lecture us on military supremacy. I might would add the French under Napoleon and Hannibal's Carthegian armies to that list as well but that aren't many who could rival the US military post the middle of 1944 in terms of military might.
Click to expand...
I assumed he was talking about countries that shouldn't lecture us in terms of imperialism.
 
#28,546
#28,546
volgr said:
Reality on the ground would say you are wrong.
Click to expand...

The reality is that a supposed military superpower is suffering costly losses against a military that is extremely out manned, gunned, and supplied. They have taken more military losses in two months than the US did in Iraq/Afghanistan/Persian Gulf combined over nearly a 20 year period against far superior military forces. Nothing about this is impressive or well planned no matter how much you want it to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, pattiycake, NorthDallas40 and 1 other person
#28,549
#28,549
landscapingvol said:
The reality is that a supposed military superpower is suffering costly losses against a military that is extremely out manned, gunned, and supplied. They have taken more military losses in two months than the US did in Iraq/Afghanistan/Persian Gulf combined over nearly a 20 year period against far superior military forces. Nothing about this is impressive or well planned no matter how much you want it to be true.
Click to expand...

Virtually none of that is true, except possibly comparing the losses.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top