War in Ukraine

Ukrainians once again taking up positions inside cities. So, when Luther and Septic are circle jerking next week about Russia bombing civilian areas...it was Ukraine who turned them into military targets.


Maybe don't shell cities for any reason?

You know, going home and stopping the invasion is also a perfectly reasonable alternative. Not committing war crimes and razing cities with absolutely no rational (let alone moral) justification is an easy call if a dichotomy is required, at least for the rational.

Ginning up a reason to invade a country and then try to justify killing civilians is what we all expect of your douchebag narrative.

Clown.
 
Last edited:
Maybe don't shell cities for any reason?

You know, going home and stopping the invasion is also a perfectly reasonable alternative. Not committing war crimes and raising cities with absolutely no rational justification is an easy call if a dichotomy is required, at least for the rational.

Ginning up a reason to invade a country and then try to justify killing civilians is what we all expect of your douchebag narrative.

Clown.

Ukraine could also surrender or they could have resolved this diplomatically during the years leading up to this. You're a pathetic dishonest coward though, so no surprise you support war crimes and nazi ideology.
 
NaZi's

You don't even realize how dumb you sound, do you?

You're the one supporting the killing of innocent civilians, nazi's, war crimes ,etc...and all for what? You still wont answer the question. Why do CARE so much about Ukraine?
 
Ukraine could also surrender or they could have resolved this diplomatically during the years leading up to this. You're a pathetic dishonest coward though, so no surprise you support war crimes or nazi ideology.

A microcosm of your idiocy in one post is you suggesting Ukraine surrender and then going on to call someone a coward.

You're dumb af.
 
You're the one supporting the killing of innocent civilians, nazi's, war crimes ,etc...and all for what? You still wont answer the question. Why do CARE so much about Ukraine?

I'll answer that if you can answer how long you were deprived of oxygen as an infant.
 
Question for anybody that's familiar with military strategy... if an invading force is trying to take a city, wouldn't the country that's being invaded have troops in or near those cities? I know it sounds crazy but just a thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and hog88
Ukraine could also surrender or they could have resolved this diplomatically during the years leading up to this. You're a pathetic dishonest coward though, so no surprise you support war crimes and nazi ideology.
How much are the Russians paying you?

Or maybe you're just not right in the head.
 
dxa0eexyfem81.png
 
Ukraine could also surrender or they could have resolved this diplomatically during the years leading up to this. You're a pathetic dishonest coward though, so no surprise you support war crimes and nazi ideology.

You have legitimately gotten dumber which I can't believe is possible
 
Question for anybody that's familiar with military strategy... if an invading force is trying to take a city, wouldn't the country that's being invaded have troops in or near those cities? I know it sounds crazy but just a thought.

In a conventional war? Yes, but Ukraine doesn't have the capacity to defend several major cities at the same time so they have to do what is effective which is a guerilla warfare strategy using the destruction and terrain as cover. It's really their only option to decimate the Russian army
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1 and AM64
Question for anybody that's familiar with military strategy... if an invading force is trying to take a city, wouldn't the country that's being invaded have troops in or near those cities? I know it sounds crazy but just a thought.

Stalingrad v2 has been rumbling around in my head. It would be poetic if the Russians were too busy making gravel with rockets to notice they were being rolled up by a Ukrainian army.
 
In a conventional war? Yes, but Ukraine doesn't have the capacity to defend several major cities at the same time so they have to do what is effective which is a guerilla warfare strategy using the destruction and terrain as cover. It's really their only option to decimate the Russian army

That's literally the secret of successfully "liberating" a country. If they weren't being held captive, they don't need liberating; they are going to resent an invader making them captive; and that's the makings of a good guerilla war. Guerilla wars don't generally work well for invaders - no home field advantage, twisted logistics, and all the other nightmares of playing on somebody else's turf. To twist Shakespeare: better to never have gone than to have gone there and lost. Stay home, and let other countries take care of internal squabbles ... assuming they actually have internal squabbles among their own people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolStrom
Question for anybody that's familiar with military strategy... if an invading force is trying to take a city, wouldn't the country that's being invaded have troops in or near those cities? I know it sounds crazy but just a thought.

Cant believe those that wrote war crime statutes never thought of this...

When you are the point of justifying war crimes...are you winning?
 
Ukrainians once again taking up positions inside cities. So, when Luther and Septic are circle jerking next week about Russia bombing civilian areas...it was Ukraine who turned them into military targets.

lol what dafug? Thats now how sh!t works. You don't bomb a f#cking hospital just because some dudes shot at you from there. No wonder you Russians are getting your asses handed to you. You have zero concept on proper rules of engagement...among other things.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top