LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 58,575
- Likes
- 59,272
No, the 2 belligerents are Russia and the West. Ukraine is a meaningless western puppet in all this.
Again the only ones dragging this out are Russia and Ukraine.
Nein. Es ist Deutsch!!!!It seems pretty much that anybody who has been ruled by the Russians for some strange reason has developed a very fond hatred for Russians. I'm going to be very disappointed when somebody doesn't take the Kaliningrad Oblast away from Russian. It should be owned by either Poland, Lithuania, or divided between them. It's one of those places you know damn well (and as history shows) never originally lay in Russian paws.
Russia is the aggressor, this is land grab and has been. The west is a factor, not the aggressor.
If the US under the current administration put troops on the ground against Russia, then it would be a colossal mistake. Ukraine isn’t even a member of NATO. People can bish about Trump and rightfully so but I don’t believe he would even think about sending troops into a regional conflict in Europe under the current circumstances ffs.Ukraine doesn't have nor did they have the means to drag this out without years of western involvement. Again, Ukraine is meaningless in all this. NATO/US have been wanting this fight for a long time and it wouldn't surprise me to see them eventually put boots on the ground.
They are in full blown retreat mode. Their original plan was Kyiv in 3 days or bust. They chose bust. What they are doing now is running away back towards the breakaway area to focus around there. They most likely realize they can only make gains near the territory they already had from 2014. Now the rest of the civilized world gets to restock Ukraine...and then some.Thats pretty interesting actually. What is especially interesting is that while the ebb and flow of taking and losing territory in other areas seems natural, the troop movement in the north around Kyiv is clearly a redployment of some sort. It wasn't that Ukraine troops took that area so much as Russians just seem to have left. Why? I dont know. Were they a distraction as they said or did the assessment come in that due to unexpected losses, they would not be able to continue to push forward?
The one thing that tells me this is just beginning though - if you were going to have negotiations and "settle" for the South Eastern gains, you keep your troops around Kyiv so you have a credible threat there to negotiate away at the table. That they are not doing that makes me think they are about to re-concentrate forces and smash through target areas in Eastern Ukraine. I mean, why not use all that space from your ally Belarus, unless maybe they are having misgivings or something else? Maybe when all Ukrainian forces are far South then Belarus hits from the North.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/co...k_on/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=shareWho is "they" and post the admission. Not disputing it, interesting in seeing it.
We've been training those old soviet bloc countries for years. That, and giving them some gear, is about all we are going to do until Russia makes another tactical mistake and hits a NATO country.If the US under the current administration put troops on the ground against Russia, then it would be a colossal mistake. Ukraine isn’t even a member of NATO. People can bish about Trump and rightfully so but I don’t believe he would even think about sending troops into a regional conflict in Europe under the current circumstances ffs.
So they aren’t Nazis now?
They’re just really stupid or love the US so much they’re willing to die for us?
If the US under the current administration put troops on the ground against Russia, then it would be a colossal mistake. Ukraine isn’t even a member of NATO. People can bish about Trump and rightfully so but I don’t believe he would even think about sending troops into a regional conflict in Europe under the current circumstances ffs.
Not one you can read.I'm not going on reddit. Have a link to an actual news site?