War in Ukraine

Yeah because we know those AA guns would go wild on their own and starts shooting a planes. Outside places like Chicago and a lot of major cities with gangs who own guns without respect to any laws, do you honestly think a rational person owning an AA gun would shoot at planes? Do you think the criminal element would stop at getting their hands on one if they wanted it? How many of the criminal element go down to the neighborhood gun store, submit to background checks, and buy guns?
if at 14, i found out one of my uncles had an AA turret, i would have snuck over there, ****ed around til i had it runnin, accidentally fired and hit a commercial airliner by mistake, kept firing at anything coming my way, thinking id be toast and eventually be tried as an adult for 8000 murders in one night.
 
if at 14, i found out one of my uncles had an AA turret, i would have snuck over there, ****ed around til i had it runnin, accidentally fired and hit a commercial airliner by mistake, kept firing at anything coming my way, thinking id be toast and eventually be tried as an adult for 8000 murders in one night.

Well, I did say "rational person" - that might leave you out on both counts. That's OK though; I think I'd want want to be on the same side as you if a special action breaks out.
 
Look *******, the response wasnt to you. If you want to jump in, at least be on topic to what I was reaponding to.
This is what Russian defeat looks like VN. Straight up lashing out instead of having an argument. Very reminiscent of Ras having to block/ignore me in the Ukraine 1 thread
 
Well, I did say "rational person" - that might leave you out on both counts. That's OK though; I think I'd want want to be on the same side as you if a special action breaks out.
woulda been a lot worse when i was 22
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
This is what Russian defeat looks like VN. Straight up lashing out instead of having an argument. Very reminiscent of Ras having to block/ignore me in the Ukraine 1 thread

"Russian defeat"? I'm not for or against Russia, so that is false. You jumped into the middle of my response with another poster with a diatribe that wasn't pertinent to what we were discussing. No wonder he blocked you.
 
Invasion........ To stop hostilities they sponsored....... How thoughtful.

Invasion, to get the attention of the west who up to that point weren't taking Russian concerns seriously and continued to militarily build up on Russia's border.
 
No, the 2 belligerents are Russia and the West. Ukraine is a meaningless western puppet in all this.
I dont think you understand that word belligerent, or your own argument.

You say Ukraine is doomed because they arent with the west, but you also say that Russia is fighting the west. Which is it?

Is Russia beating Ukraine, or is Russia defeating the West, while simultaneously the West is Ukraines only hope?

I have pointed this out multiple times to you and you have ducked it each time. You even had to lash out the time to distract from your deflection
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1 and AM64
Just as they did in response to Bucha, Russia releases a detailed response to the Train Station bombing...
 
I dont think you understand that word belligerent, or your own argument.

You say Ukraine is doomed because they arent with the west, but you also say that Russia is fighting the west. Which is it?

Is Russia beating Ukraine, or is Russia defeating the West, while simultaneously the West is Ukraines only hope?

I have pointed this out multiple times to you and you have ducked it each time. You even had to lash out the time to distract from your deflection

Easy. Ukraine is doomed unless the West commits troops. That doesn't mean that the west isn't propping up Ukraine in other ways and dragging this war out much longer than it needed to be. This also doesn't take into account IMF loans Ukraine has and the strings those come attached with. Russia, currently, is in fact beating Ukraine on the battlefield and beating the West at their own game of sanctions. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
 
Invasion, to get the attention of the west who up to that point weren't taking Russian concerns seriously and continued to militarily build up on Russia's border.
To deter a possible Russian proliferation taking into account Georgia. Quit pretending the west is the aggressor in this land grab.
 
Easy. Ukraine is doomed unless the West commits troops. That doesn't mean that the west isn't propping up Ukraine in other ways and dragging this war out much longer than it needed to be. This also doesn't take into account IMF loans Ukraine has and the strings those come attached with. Russia, currently, is in fact beating Ukraine on the battlefield and beating the West at their own game of sanctions. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
Again the only ones dragging this out are Russia and Ukraine. Particularly Russia as the aggressors. I would bet Ukraine would take peace the moment their borders were honored and their sovereignty recognized. They have made it clear with their efforts they dont want to be under Putins thumb. If you want to believe there is only a dichotomy, fine, but Ukraine made their choice. And have done so with their own blood.

No one can force Ukraine to take the money or weapons and use them to fight the war. If they had no will to fight, or really wanted "liberating" they wouldnt be fighting. That is why I keep saying the only two that matter are Ukraine and Russia. Until one of them stop, it doesnt matter what the rest does. And right now Russia is in the wrong being the aggressor actively occupying another country.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top