volgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 8,129
- Likes
- 8,463
Sure. But when the article you post ***** on your own argument you should pause.
The article was linked in a tweet talking about how the west, who has been full of sh1t up to this point, is finally starting to tell the truth in how Russia is operating this war. Which is to spare civilian lives at all costs. Russia has had to lay waste to some parts of cities, but it isnt because they wanted to.
Be honest, if you can.
 
				 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 Let me get this straight, Russia invaded Ukraine to free them from the Azov forces meanwhile all the destruction in Ukraine is caused by the Azov forces but there is no destruction because fewer than 1k people have been killed per Russia? Putin himself admitted that Russian forces had indeed attacked civilian areas but blamed it on local Russian commanders. Which is it, there is no destruction with few civilian casualties or there is widespread destruction and genocide caused by the elusive Azov battalion that can’t be stopped even though Russia’s military is doing whatever they want?
 Let me get this straight, Russia invaded Ukraine to free them from the Azov forces meanwhile all the destruction in Ukraine is caused by the Azov forces but there is no destruction because fewer than 1k people have been killed per Russia? Putin himself admitted that Russian forces had indeed attacked civilian areas but blamed it on local Russian commanders. Which is it, there is no destruction with few civilian casualties or there is widespread destruction and genocide caused by the elusive Azov battalion that can’t be stopped even though Russia’s military is doing whatever they want? 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
