cncchris33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 35,476
- Likes
- 55,753
I love how @johnfnkelly thinks it takes me looking at advanced metrics to prove how categorically wrong he is when it comes to Oscar Tshiebwe’s value as a college player. Spoiler alert… points, field goal attempts, and rebounds aren’t advanced metrics.I love how @cncchris33 thinks he can take a glance at somebody’s advance metrics and conclude he knows the ins and outs of every player. That’s not how basketball works.
Tshiebwe has a very good outside shot and is strong at the ft line. Bashing him is as hard to understand as the Barnes bashers. How I wish we could be so lucky that our SEC POW would be the matchup were the most worried about in our next opponent!Oscar is barely projected to be drafted, but will end up a good NBA player? He's 6'9. Can't defend mobile bigs and has 0 outside shot. No elite go-to move under the basket. Struggles against length. Lost the battle vs Walker Kessler and could barely get a shot over Aidoo.
He has a good motor and can run but he's not an elite athlete by any means.
It's not the 90's anymore.
Oscar has taken 0 3pt shots this season and is a 69% career free throw shooter.Tshiebwe has a very good outside shot and is strong at the ft line. Bashing him is as hard to understand as the Barnes bashers. How I wish we could be so lucky that our SEC POW would be the matchup were the most worried about in our next opponent!
I love how @johnfnkelly thinks it takes me looking at advanced metrics to prove how categorically wrong he is when it comes to Oscar Tshiebwe’s value as a college player. Spoiler alert… points, field goal attempts, and rebounds aren’t advanced metrics.
Rather, the only “advanced metric” you’ve provided is “he doesn’t pass my eye test”. You’ve ignored every other protest and manner of proof to dissolve your silly opinion on the matter, and instead, you’ve chosen to exercise some real mental gymnastics to ineffectively prove your point, and now you’re just calling people out to deflect from your flimsy argument. That seems to be going well.
Ok, bud. I guess his 17 pts and 20 rebs were the reason UK lost to Duke just like his 30 and 18 is why they lost at Arkansas. Just not productive enough and costing his team some additional wins. A real shame. I think it's cute how you pin his team's success (wins and losses) solely on him and his numbers, despite how well he may have played, individually. Solid argument.I don’t need stats to prove Oscar is an overrated basketball player. He’s not a top 5 player in the country to me. His numbers are often empty. The only game against an elite team where his big numbers translated to a win was against Kansas.
Ok, bud. I guess his 17 pts and 20 rebs were the reason UK lost to Duke just like his 30 and 18 is why they lost at Arkansas. Just not productive enough and costing his team some additional wins. A real shame. I think it's cute how you pin his team's success (wins and losses) solely on him and his numbers, despite how well he may have played, individually. Solid argument.
So a 12-18 foot shot by a center is no longer an “outside shot” - only 3 pointers are considered “outside shots”? Tshiebwe is certainly a solid shooter outside the paint and inside the 3 point line this season. I’m not Calipari, but if I’ve got the leading rebounder for the past 40 years I sure don’t want him out at the 3 point line.Oscar has taken 0 3pt shots this season and is a 69% career free throw shooter.
Certainly. Happy to assist.If you could pinpoint where I stated UK’s success is solely on him that’d be great. Thanks.
What does that bolded statement imply? It certainly reads as though you believe team success/failure ("wins against elite teams") is directly tied to Tshiebwe's production ("big numbers").I don’t need stats to prove Oscar is an overrated basketball player. He’s not a top 5 player in the country to me. His numbers are often empty. The only game against an elite team where his big numbers translated to a win was against Kansas.
I don’t really understand how this can jive with the coaching staff if they’re supposedly not involved.If true, I hope there’s another $100 million left for linemen and the defense.
One argument that I heard against it is that Heupel is going to take any very good QB and make them great. Like Ty Simpson when he transfers to TN.
Which is somewhat ironic given that he was also stirring the pot over Tennessee allegedly not being prepared when NIL was signed into law. Now that we have our act together, he's complaining that we are using it to our advantage.Basilio is pushing the narrative and stirring the **** that he’s the player getting an $8 million N-I-L deal. That doesn’t sound very Tennessee. While saying he’s too skinny and will be broken in two.
