zeppelin128
Possibly a llama.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 23,624
- Likes
- 33,996
The British might not fall due to their geography but I don’t think they’d be able to do much other than survive. God forbid Nukes are even considered.I'm not. The French may fall, but the Brits would not. Keep in mind that France and England combined have about 500 nuclear weapons at their disposal....not that it would come to that, but still.
Report: Biden to Divert Agents from U.S. Southern Border, Send Them to ‘Assist’ with Russia-Ukraine Conflict
President Joe Biden’s administration is looking to divert United States Border Patrol agents from their mission at the U.S.-Mexico border to send them overseas “to assist” those fleeing from Ukraine amidst Russia’s invasion, a new report states.
Even as illegal immigration continues pouring through the nation’s southern border at record levels, Biden hopes to entice Border Patrol agents to sign up voluntarily to aid American citizens, green card-holders, and their immediate relatives fleeing Ukraine into Eastern Europe.
Report: Biden to Divert Agents from U.S. Border, Send Them to Poland
I should have written OOC, my mistake. You should read up on relative military strengths and military industrial capabilities. The Europeans and Japanese are quite formidable. They're not so reliant on the US to be weak. I'm not sure what decadence has to do with it but if you want decadence then Russia's got it.No I live for the Bama game lol. Why do you think Japan is strong? They virtually have zero military forces. Here’s something for you to laugh about, I think Ukraine has the second most tanks on the continent ( next to Russia), and they are unfortunately getting steamrolled. European armies just don’t have the punch that they used to possess, they’ve become decadent and overly reliant on the US. I think Chamberlain gets an unfairly negative portrayal. England was on the verge of annihilation and Chamberlain naturally wanted to avoid that risk, hard to blame the man
Is this really a bad thing, though? Per the article:I would quit first!
I'm not even sure what this means or where the humor is, but ok.LMAO you absolutely are. I saw your zerohedge post. You’re already laying the ground work for your “Zelensky needs to just sue for peace and save what he can of his country. After all Putin just wants what’s best for all Russians and Ukrainians” water carrying![]()
The West is not going to get directly militarily involved unless Putin is stupid enough to attack a NATO state and trigger Article 5.I could see the US or our Allies getting involved if Russia starts bombing civilians purposely. I don’t see how we could sit by if this happens. At least eliminating the Russian air threat.
Is this really a bad thing, though? Per the article:
“The Office of Field Operations is seeking volunteers to assist with the possible evacuation of U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and their immediate family members from Ukraine.,” the memo sent to field operations executives said. [Emphasis added]
“Eligible employees who volunteer for this situation may be selected to serve a temporary duty assignment in Poland to facilitate travelers for entry into the U.S., to include providing guidance and problems resolution to other government agencies.” [Emphasis added]
The sourced Breitbart's article emphasis, not mine. That headline is incredibly misleading.