War in Ukraine

Bowl's premise is that Trump is sympathetic to Russian aggression - he said that - providing approval by stating Trump is happier than a pig in slop. Trump clearly condemns the invasion as wrong when stating he'd not have done that in his tenure.

If you wander in and ignore the premise, you're the weak link.
Further, I think you're not accustomed to coherent analogies.
That is hardly what I would call clear condemnation of this actual invasion.
 
Do you have any proof that Donald Trump has ever been publicly critical of Vladimir Putin? No. He NEVER has been.

What difference does that make? He spoke about being tough on Russia. He didn't have to criticize the man personally. You're building a strawman argument that you can slay.

This is so silly. "Have you heard Trump talking $h!t about Pootin? That's what I thought."

Leaders of the democrat party have destroyed the remainder of the weak relationship we had with them. All that $h!t talking hasn't done one thing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
Situation is a bit different. I think you'd have to admit. Of course, if Trump was President he'd be telling us that Putin denied very forcefully having attacked Ukraine and that he believes him. And that he doesn't understand why it would be Russia. Or, oops, I mean wouldn't be Russia. And that we should stay at Trump hotels.

Wtf are you babbling about?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top