Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

People who believe COVID-19 misinformation are more likely to contract the virus.

Contracting COVID-19: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of beliefs and knowledge | Scientific Reports

Wow, it’s almost as if listening to false information about the virus and the vaccines are more likely to completely abandon guidelines. Who knew?!
You should really concern yourself with studies that are applicable to you.

Worrying about COVID-19 leads to poorer choices, mental decline
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have any idea if a positive test for the coronavirus 229e variant is being counted in the current upswing of case numbers nationwide?
 
Would be more effective if he set someone else on fire
Interesting. Let me think about this...

aki-and-pawpaw-thinking.gif
 

Nuts that some people think removing things like this from the Internet is alright. If it's fake, then there's no danger in letting it float around because it's not true and will not prove true, and the process of sussing this stuff out is great for society. If it's real, then it's the truth and it should be out. Instead, we get censorship and idiocy from the left trying to bury whatever they can out of their newfound love of corporate interests.
 
Nuts that some people think removing things like this from the Internet is alright. If it's fake, then there's no danger in letting it float around because it's not true and will not prove true, and the process of sussing this stuff out is great for society. If it's real, then it's the truth and it should be out. Instead, we get censorship and idiocy from the left trying to bury whatever they can out of their newfound love of corporate interests.
Electronic book burning
 
Electronic book burning
That essentially goes on now all over the world.

When I was in Beijing a few years back, I 'googled' Tank Guy Tiananmen square. All the references were there... it's just that they were all blocked. ALL of them. Of course now I would wager most everyone in China has a VPN which will allow one to see those stories, but I am also sure the penalty for viewing them could be quite severe.

Vax cards to 'vote' or go out in public.... what a great ****ing idea. And I am sure Herr Zuckerberg and Herr Dorsey have only the best of intentions.
 
Nuts that some people think removing things like this from the Internet is alright. If it's fake, then there's no danger in letting it float around because it's not true and will not prove true, and the process of sussing this stuff out is great for society. If it's real, then it's the truth and it should be out. Instead, we get censorship and idiocy from the left trying to bury whatever they can out of their newfound love of corporate interests.
2nd
It should not be removed for any reason. If it’s fake or false then disprove it. Freedom of speech and freedom of thought that leads to conversation and debate is the fastest, and only way to truth.
 

I'm two hours in (on Spotify), and the interview has more explanation of the infective process and immune response to CV19 than anything I've read, to date. Dr. Malone has been an esteemed authority in his field for decades. It is insane that he is being de-platformed for sharing information and advocating for informed consent.
 
I'm two hours in (on Spotify), and the interview has more explanation of the infective process and immune response to CV19 than anything I've read, to date. Dr. Malone has been an esteemed authority in his field for decades. It is insane that he is being de-platformed for sharing information and advocating for informed consent.
His reputation and credibility have also be attacked.
 
I'm two hours in (on Spotify), and the interview has more explanation of the infective process and immune response to CV19 than anything I've read, to date. Dr. Malone has been an esteemed authority in his field for decades. It is insane that he is being de-platformed for sharing information and advocating for informed consent.

What is his position on the vaccines? Against using them? Against using them on kids?
 
What is his position on the vaccines? Against using them? Against using them on kids?
His position is that people need full information, including the risks and efficacy (esp with the new variant), in order to give informed consent. He is against their use in children and younger women (due to myocarditis and effect on the ovaries).
 
Advertisement





Back
Top