C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 31,801
- Likes
- 55,884
There is a narrative that they have to maintain, slice. You are not going to get any honest data from western sources regarding Ivermectin.
geezus. Either you're trolling or severely developmentally delayed.
Those deaths were not attributed to damn vaccine you goof.
Do you even read?
Yes, Ivermectin works better with zinc, but doesn't mean it is necessarily non-effective without it in most people.Interesting though
Most Drs are telling people to take high doses of Vit C and Zink with the ivermectin. In a separate study the VitC and Zink out preformed placebo significantly where ivermectin doesn’t without the C and Zink.
Ivermectin by itself has no significant difference with placebo vs Covid.Yes, Ivermectin works better with zinc, but doesn't mean it is necessarily non-effective without it in most people.
I'm not sure what you are driving at here. Are you saying zinc and vitamin c (and I would add vitamin d) are better options?
Those were reported Covid vaccine deaths. If Covid caused their death or not is a separate question, just the idea of how many people of those reported to have died of Covid actually died due to Covid.
But it’s impossible to have an honest conversation with you about that if you refuse to be honest about the number of reported deaths
Yeah, no incentive to report anything positive about it in the west.Double Blind study with all methodology available for review.
That’s as tight as it gets
For the love of god.
They were reported deaths from those that had the vaccine, for all manners of death. This is fundamentally different from your assertion that 20k died from the vaccine.
If a guy was vaccinated and got hit by a bus, he was one of the 14k that was reported by VAERS, it literally states that the numbers included EVERYONE that died under the section title "Reporting Even Unrelated Deaths."
It's astonishing that you can't reconcile this singular point after being hand held to the finish line.
I refuse to believe anyone's reading comprehension is this absurdly poor.
Yeah, no incentive to report anything positive about it in the west.
I think even you and the cynics would have to agree that it isn't as dangerous as it was made out to be this summer with all of the horse de-wormer propaganda and fake hospital rooms and gunshot victim stories. So it is safe enough to where it wouldn't hurt to offer it if the patient wants to take it.
I’ve never argued it was dangerous. I’ve consistently said you should be allowed to take it if you want. it remains unproven. That’s my only point. just like Plaquenil I wish it worked.Yeah, no incentive to report anything positive about it in the west.
I think even you and the cynics would have to agree that it isn't as dangerous as it was made out to be this summer with all of the horse de-wormer propaganda and fake hospital rooms and gunshot victim stories. So it is safe enough to where it wouldn't hurt to offer it if the patient wants to take it.
The problem is the number of posters who are working backwards from their desired endpoint and shoehorning the data to fit that end. You cannot change the mind of someone who has committed to a specific end in advance of being provided evidence to any end.
I could probably list the crew that's about to drop in and say "But that's what you do!" about my assertion.
Yes.
Its funny you mention that because for some reason, one of the sickest people I know has been able to dodge COVID this entire time and they are prescribed Plaquenil. Could be coincidence maybe... but I know they have a weakened immune system and have other comorbidities. If they manage to make it past this winter, it might be something to it.I’ve never argued it was dangerous. I’ve consistently said you should be allowed to take it if you want. it remains unproven. That’s my only point. just like Plaquenil I wish it worked.