Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#3,226
#3,226
VolStrom said:
I think it was called a Family Inn, but don't quote me because I can't remember. There were a lot of construction transients and most likely those cheating on their spouses there. I survived.
Click to expand...

I stayed at a Days Inn in Daytona once. I'll just say I'm not going back anytime soon.
 
#3,228
#3,228
I assumed so but if it relates to this MSNBC issue remember that:

1) We first heard itt that the reporter was an employee of MSNBC.
2) We then learned that his employment status is not clear, at all.
3) We then learned that there are statements that he is a free lance journalist who does some reporting for NBC.
4) We then learned that he claimed he had been ordered by someone at either MSNBC or NBC to follow the jurors.
5) We then learned that both networks say they are looking into it and will cooperate with any investigation.

Seems like it was wrong for some in the right wing media to gleefully, but incorrectly, report that the reporter was from MSNBC. But that's about all we know for sure right now. It will be investigated.

So I don't think I'm an idiot for making these rather important distinctions, though I know it at least temporarily robs the Fox echo chamber and the other media hating folks here of a talking point and that maybe its not simply as clear cut as first reported.
 
#3,229
#3,229
lawgator1 said:
I assumed so but if it relates to this MSNBC issue remember that:

1) We first heard itt that the reporter was an employee of MSNBC.
2) We then learned that his employment status is not clear, at all.
3) We then learned that there are statements that he is a free lance journalist who does some reporting for NBC.
4) We then learned that he claimed he had been ordered by someone at either MSNBC or NBC to follow the jurors.
5) We then learned that both networks say they are looking into it and will cooperate with any investigation.

Seems like it was wrong for some in the right wing media to gleefully, but incorrectly, report that the reporter was from MSNBC. But that's about all we know for sure right now. It will be investigated.

So I don't think I'm an idiot for making these rather important distinctions, though I know it at least temporarily robs the Fox echo chamber and the other media hating folks here of a talking point and that maybe its not simply as clear cut as first reported.
Click to expand...
LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and SpaceCoastVol
#3,231
#3,231
lawgator1 said:
I assumed so but if it relates to this MSNBC issue remember that:

1) We first heard itt that the reporter was an employee of MSNBC.
2) We then learned that his employment status is not clear, at all.
3) We then learned that there are statements that he is a free lance journalist who does some reporting for NBC.
4) We then learned that he claimed he had been ordered by someone at either MSNBC or NBC to follow the jurors.
5) We then learned that both networks say they are looking into it and will cooperate with any investigation.

Seems like it was wrong for some in the right wing media to gleefully, but incorrectly, report that the reporter was from MSNBC. But that's about all we know for sure right now. It will be investigated.

So I don't think I'm an idiot for making these rather important distinctions, though I know it at least temporarily robs the Fox echo chamber and the other media hating folks here of a talking point and that maybe its not simply as clear cut as first reported.
Click to expand...

You gleefully accused another poster of leaving out the information on purpose when you didn't even have the story right!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188 and StarRaider
#3,235
#3,235
Am I missing something from this provocation argument? I have never seen footage of Kyle pointing his gun at Rosenbaum or Zielinski...there are ppl on Twitter saying its obvious he did
 
#3,237
#3,237
VolnJC said:
Am I missing something from this provocation argument? I have never seen footage of Kyle pointing his gun at Rosenbaum or Zielinski...there are ppl on Twitter saying its obvious he did
Click to expand...

people on Twitter...

j/k

unless the HD video shows it I don't remember seeing that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#3,239
#3,239
volinbham said:
He is a respected legal mind. It started going south when he questioned the Russia-gate reporting and called it like he saw it. Turns out he was correct but that put him on the wrong side. He's also a Democrat.
Click to expand...
He may very well be. I dont know much about him, but I also remember the same thing being said about Sydney Powell.
 
#3,241
#3,241
Vol8188 said:
Except nothing about this encounter involved a kid “enforcing the law”. Instead it was an example of a kid defending himself against violent criminals.

If anything it would be seen as an example of why you should consider arming your kids
Click to expand...

Sorry, your spin is unconvincing.

He showed up to a riot to "protect his community" (his words), which implies he was looking to enforce the law.

Fast forwarding to the circumstances that resulted in two peoples death is irrelevant to what he was doing there to begin with.

Anyone who would advocate that there kids go to a riot, armed is an idiot. If that shoe fits...
 
#3,245
#3,245
Septic said:
Sorry, your spin is unconvincing.

He showed up to a riot to "protect his community" (his words), which implies he was looking to enforce the law.

Fast forwarding to the circumstances that resulted in two peoples death is irrelevant to what he was doing there to begin with.

Anyone who would advocate that there kids go to a riot, armed is an idiot. If that shoe fits...
Click to expand...

It’s odd you only apply this absurd logic of “who would go there anyway” to one side. The people there rioting, well clearly that’s fine. But the kid? He’s the real problem here.

But once again, the issue wasn’t him trying to enforce the law.

The only people who we know for a fact were behaving as actual vigilantes are the people he shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, MemphisVol77, BreatheUT and 1 other person
#3,246
#3,246
Septic said:
Sorry, your spin is unconvincing.

He showed up to a riot to "protect his community" (his words), which implies he was looking to enforce the law.

Fast forwarding to the circumstances that resulted in two peoples death is irrelevant to what he was doing there to begin with.

Anyone who would advocate that there kids go to a riot, armed is an idiot. If that shoe fits...
Click to expand...
1) Kyle was part of a larger group 2) The police knew they were there thanked them and brought them water 3) That "kid" you speak of was legally old enough to join a militia by the Constitution
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#3,249
#3,249
Septic said:
Sorry, your spin is unconvincing.

He showed up to a riot to "protect his community" (his words), which implies he was looking to enforce the law.

Fast forwarding to the circumstances that resulted in two peoples death is irrelevant to what he was doing there to begin with.

Anyone who would advocate that there kids go to a riot, armed is an idiot. If that shoe fits...
Click to expand...


Kyle has a trolling moter and lower unit you may be interested in!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top