@508Mikey

#28
#28
volfanbill said:
Who thinks Milton should be a starter with viable alternatives? Heupel has shown he plays the better player when available. So it’s certainly not him.

Do you think Bailey is a better option right now? If so, why,
Click to expand...
No better game than to see for sure about Bailey
 
#33
#33
volfanbill said:
So you don’t have an answer. You’re either trolling, mad, or both. And I understand that.
Click to expand...
Mad the kid isn't getting a chance, Anyway lots of stuff for Huepel to figure out nowThe flopping is disrupting his offense that's more worrisome than who is the QB now
 
#34
#34
508mikey said:
Mad the kid isn't getting a chance, Anyway lots of stuff for Huepel to figure out nowThe flopping is disrupting his offense that's more worrisome than who is the QB now
Click to expand...
He had his chance. And it was the stuff of nightmares
 
#37
#37
If Bailey was here last year and started four games and could not beat out two QBs in practice, one who missed spring practice, then clearly he is not the best option
Look at our offensive numbers this year
The coaches know what they're doing
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile and volfanbill
#45
#45
VolNExile said:
"Stubbornly attached" means that he has viable alternatives and ignores them.

Right now, unless Hooker is suddenly well again, Heupel doesn't have an alternative.
Click to expand...

Between the BG, Pitt, UF, and Ole Miss games (plus his time at Michigan), Milton has proven he's not the answer. I'd rather give HB the shot against Bama to see if there's a spark (if Hooker is out).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 508mikey
#47
#47
BigOrangeMojo said:
Between the BG, Pitt, UF, and Ole Miss games (plus his time at Michigan), Milton has proven he's not the answer. I'd rather give HB the shot against Bama to see if there's a spark (if Hooker is out).
Click to expand...
Jeez that's all I'm saying too
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top