AV_12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 50,216
- Likes
- 18,059
I'd rather wait and see what happens with the kids. You never know when it will click for someone. This is if you don't sell them while they have value and before it crashes.I'm not big on a .500 team being aggressive for a 1 year rental, but if AA can get a guy for next year too, he's got to take a look even if he's not sure we can win this year.
I don't see how one precludes the other. You can add a player or two without completely blocking all the prospects. Whatever happens, there's going to be a competition for CF, SS, C, a couple of rotation spots and the entire bullpen. Just a matter of whether it starts on Labor Day or waits until Spring Training.I'd rather wait and see what happens with the kids. You never know when it will click for someone. This is if you don't sell them while they have value and before it crashes.
A competition at SS? Lol from whoI don't see how one precludes the other. You can add a player or two without completely blocking all the prospects. Whatever happens, there's going to be a competition for CF, SS, C, a couple of rotation spots and the entire bullpen. Just a matter of whether it starts on Labor Day or waits until Spring Training.
I just threw that in because Dansby will be FA. I know there's nobody in the pipeline. Guess they could decide the rest of the lineup is good enough to go on the cheap and bat Arcia 8th, but I highly doubt it.
It's not just about blocking, but thinking longer term. Trading away cheap contracts for guys who may walk in two or three years with nobody to replace them.I don't see how one precludes the other. You can add a player or two without completely blocking all the prospects. Whatever happens, there's going to be a competition for CF, SS, C, a couple of rotation spots and the entire bullpen. Just a matter of whether it starts on Labor Day or waits until Spring Training.