Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#96,326
#96,326
Tyler Durden said:
The article covers the long term side effects some children are experiencing after being diagnosed with COVID, explicitly stating that often these children never wind up in a hospital but suffer from home. It's clear you know how to cherry pick things that support your stance as opposed to looking at the overall facts of a given situation.
Click to expand...

So after only 1 year, scientists can predict with 100% certainty what the long term effects of COVID are? Do you seriously believe this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002, 0nelilreb, davethevol and 1 other person
#96,330
#96,330
NurseGoodVol said:
You wording is assuming every parent who chooses not to vaccinate their children sign them up for their visit to the polio, measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis summer camp. I personally was signed up for and signed my children up for chickenpox camp... it was fun.

Children are removed from their parents for some pretty horrific acts. Being a naturalist is not one of those acts. Your statement seems like you are trying to equate non vaccination with physical abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse, children testing positive for illegal substances and being starved by their parents. Those are actual reasons children are removed from parents. So just for clarity you aren't comparing those things as equal to not vaccinating a child are you?

Why do you suppose pharma can't be sued for the effects of their vaccines?(they would lose)

Why do you suppose there aren't any studies I could find that focus on several vaccines given at one time and their pan effect when given together?
( I'll help you out, it doesn't exist because a company would be committing stock market suicide by conducting that study and releasing it)

I think I'm gonna start posting anti-vaxers twitter posts since that tends to be communication you prefer. I'm not going to read them first, I'm just posting them by headline content. I might have a hard time finding one come to think of it. You speak up about vaccines and their possible dangers you end up with your head on a figurative pike.
@NorthDallas40 Pfffft, I'm not worried about no jealousy.
Click to expand...
Are they equal? No. Is choosing to not vaccinate your child stupid, dangerous, can lead them to serious illness or even death, and totally avoidable? Yes. How does that not sound like a situation where the children's health and safety is being neglected by their parents?

There are decades of evidence on the effectiveness of vaccines and how they've completely transformed our society. Only until the anti-vax camp found a home on the internet did this crap start becoming an issue.
 
#96,331
#96,331
BigOrangeTrain said:
So after only 1 year, scientists can predict with 100% certainty what the long term effects of COVID are? Do you seriously believe this?
Click to expand...
I believe after 1 year they know a lot more about the long term effects of COVID than they did before, and more times than not throughout the COVID pandemic have been far more right than wrong.

I know that the people who continually question their work are the same people who think masks don't work, who thought COVID would be over after 2 weeks, then after the election, then if they injected themselves with disinfectant, then after Biden took office, then when Trump took back office in March. Now those same people are questioning the effectiveness of a vaccine that is saving lives.

You can keep believing the Qnuts and OAN contributors, I'll stick with listening to the scientists who actually know what they're talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#96,332
#96,332
Tyler Durden said:
I believe after 1 year they know a lot more about the long term effects of COVID than they did before, and more times than not throughout the COVID pandemic have been far more right than wrong.

I know that the people who continually question their work are the same people who think masks don't work, who thought COVID would be over after 2 weeks, then after the election, then if they injected themselves with disinfectant, then after Biden took office, then when Trump took back office in March. Now those same people are questioning the effectiveness of a vaccine that is saving lives.

You can keep believing the Qnuts and OAN contributors, I'll stick with listening to the scientists who actually know what they're talking about.
Click to expand...
No, you choose to listen to scientists who agree with you. Big difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and NorthDallas40
#96,333
#96,333
utvolpj said:
No, you choose to listen to scientists who agree with you. Big difference
Click to expand...
Right the CDC, Fauci, Dr. Burke. People who have an established history of fighting infectious diseases and doing everything they can to prevent the spread or further spread of them.

Not anonymous message board doctors, Facebook Karens, Donald Trump, or anti-vax Qanon conspiracy theorists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#96,334
#96,334
Tyler Durden said:
Right the CDC, Fauci, Dr. Burke. People who have an established history of fighting infectious diseases and doing everything they can to prevent the spread or further spread of them.

Not anonymous message board doctors, Facebook Karens, Donald Trump, or anti-vax Qanon conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...
Oh those are some reliable sources whom have been consistent and accurate thru this deadly pandemic for sure 🤡
 
#96,335
#96,335
Tyler Durden said:
I believe after 1 year they know a lot more about the long term effects of COVID than they did before, and more times than not throughout the COVID pandemic have been far more right than wrong.

I know that the people who continually question their work are the same people who think masks don't work, who thought COVID would be over after 2 weeks, then after the election, then if they injected themselves with disinfectant, then after Biden took office, then when Trump took back office in March. Now those same people are questioning the effectiveness of a vaccine that is saving lives.

You can keep believing the Qnuts and OAN contributors, I'll stick with listening to the scientists who actually know what they're talking about.
Click to expand...

This post is full of sophomoric garbage. Using the inject with disinfectant argument? You are just another that took what Trump said out of context because you didn’t understand it.

So after 1 year they know what will happen long term? Yet you and others say there is no evidence of long term effects from the vaccine. Don’t you see how foolish this is?

And continuing to say everyone who questions things is either a Q lover or watches OAN proves your critical thinking skills are severely lacking.

Serious question for you. Is science supposed to be questioned?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#96,336
#96,336
Tyler Durden said:
Right the CDC, Fauci, Dr. Burke. People who have an established history of fighting infectious diseases and doing everything they can to prevent the spread or further spread of them.

Not anonymous message board doctors, Facebook Karens, Donald Trump, or anti-vax Qanon conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...

What about the plethora of doctors that have spoken out against what those others have said? Why are they immediately discredited?
 
#96,339
#96,339
Tyler Durden said:
Right the CDC, Fauci, Dr. Burke. People who have an established history of fighting infectious diseases and doing everything they can to prevent the spread or further spread of them.

Not anonymous message board doctors, Facebook Karens, Donald Trump, or anti-vax Qanon conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...
The problem with credibility is you can lose it. The CDC and the rest have lost theirs. Just a few reasons:

Admitting that they used a very flawed study to justify mask mandates outside. Using this faulty study overstated the risk by 10 fold.

Claiming fully vaccinated people should wear masks bc of other peoples feelings to seeing an unmasked person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#96,340
#96,340
BigOrangeTrain said:
This post is full of sophomoric garbage. Using the inject with disinfectant argument? You are just another that took what Trump said out of context because you didn’t understand it.

So after 1 year they know what will happen long term? Yet you and others say there is no evidence of long term effects from the vaccine. Don’t you see how foolish this is?

And continuing to say everyone who questions things is either a Q lover or watches OAN proves your critical thinking skills are severely lacking.

Serious question for you. Is science supposed to be questioned?
Click to expand...

Questioned by whom? Other unbiased, established scientists in the area of study? Sure.

Questioned by internet randos who get their "facts" from Facebook, 4chan, Cable News, or the volnation political forum? No.
 
#96,342
#96,342
BigOrangeTrain said:
So how do you prove scientists are unbiased?
Click to expand...
I heard there's a secret cabal of democrats that are priveledged enough to make that distinction. Before a scientist receives their PHD they must meet with said cabal and drink from a cup filled with a child's blood. Once they do that, said democrats grant them their PHD and make sure that the media knows that the scientist is unbiased and trustworthy.

On a serious note, scientists work are often extensively peer reviewed so that whatever potential bias or inconsistencies exists are rooted out before their work is made public and accepted as factual, rather than theoretical.
 
#96,349
#96,349
McDad said:
I am probably the most anti vax person on the board. More accurately I am delayed vax more than anti vax. I also make a distinction between necessary and unnecessary vaccinations. Some diseases processes have a poor prognosis. Other diseases are an irritant or nuisance.

Should my daughter who is now 23 and married have been inoculated against HPV? If so, why?
Click to expand...
Solid no on that.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top