Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#93,827
#93,827
kiddiedoc said:
It's just tough to say. There's no way to "test" for this protection, because we don't know exactly what provides it. It would be nice to see a study looking at the percentage of close/in-home contacts of a symptomatic person that actually get sick.
Click to expand...
I gave your post some thought last night. Correct me if I am wrong, but C19 is another type or SARS virus. Stands to reason the percent of population not susceptible to other SARS would be about the same percentage as not susceptible to this type. Although I guess this type may be more virulent than the others. Any data or intuition about the potency of C19 compared to other SARS?

The article linked is another tactic of conformity. All those at risk and fearful have been vaccinated. Now that the rest aren't motivated by fear, it is time to change the tactic to shame. That ain't going to work on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
#93,828
#93,828
mad4vols said:
Good for them
View attachment 365778
Click to expand...
Moxy Hotels:
but im vaccinated. We don't care.
it's a hoax. We don't care.
I've had it. We don't care.
Mandate expired. We don't care.

Moxy CFO: We are losing revenue. .......We DO care.

I am all for any private business doing what they want. But this company will not die on the hill of symbolic safety if revenue goes down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL, BigOrangeTrain, 82_VOL_83 and 13 others
#93,829
#93,829
kiddiedoc said:
It's just tough to say. There's no way to "test" for this protection, because we don't know exactly what provides it. It would be nice to see a study looking at the percentage of close/in-home contacts of a symptomatic person that actually get sick.
Click to expand...

Went through my house. Wife, 17yo, 14, and 12 all had it with mild symptoms. I was vaccinated and never felt a thing and tested negative. My youngest is 11. He was is among everyone. Never isolated him. Had similar mild symptoms. Tested a couple of times and was always negative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiddiedoc and McDad
#93,830
#93,830
newyorkvol said:
Went through my house. Wife, 17yo, 14, and 12 all had it with mild symptoms. I was vaccinated and never felt a thing and tested negative. My youngest is 11. He was is among everyone. Never isolated him. Had similar mild symptoms. Tested a couple of times and was always negative.
Click to expand...
I guess it is possible to have such a mild infection, someone can test negative even though they technically are infected???
 
#93,833
#93,833
McDad said:
I guess it is possible to have such a mild infection, someone can test negative even though they technically are infected???
Click to expand...

@kiddiedoc can certainly correct me if I’m wrong, but it likely comes back to T cell immunity. SARS cov 2 is in same family of coronviruses as the common cold. And there have been studies showing the increased exposure of kids to those more “routine” viruses especially in elementary schools. There have also been studies showing T cell cross reactivity to this coronavirus. In particular, a study from last summer showed that blood work from healthcare workers who had sars cov 1 in the early 2000’s still showed T cell reactivity to sars cov 2 17 years after initial infection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiddiedoc and McDad
#93,835
#93,835
mad4vols said:
ImmunaBand
ImmunaBand has designed a seamless bracelet that will erase the uncertainty we are all experiencing. The sleek bracelets are the symbol of vaccination and -- hopefully -- of society’s eventual triumph over this pandemic. Wear this bracelet to work, to restaurants, and to let people know your commitment to overcoming this disease through your completion of the vaccination series. The bracelet is also a symbol of your commitment to safety -- for yourself and for others.
View attachment 365772
Click to expand...
I’m not responsible for others safety.
Wash your hands, stay at home if you are sick.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL, BigOrangeTrain, Rickyvol77 and 3 others
#93,841
#93,841
mad4vols said:
Maybe we could reach Herd Immunity, if there wasn't so much Herd Stupidity?
Click to expand...
Not necessary. Certainly not helpful to "win people to your side of thinking". According to some percentages to reach HIT, over 80M Americans could go unvaccinated and society will still reach herd immunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#93,843
#93,843
hog88 said:
Nope. You're not paying me, you're not my employee and you're not my guest so I have no responsibility to you whatsoever.
Click to expand...
lol.........
Reckless endangerment is a crime consisting of acts that create a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person. The accused person isn't required to intend the resulting or potential harm, but must have acted in a way that showed a disregard for the foreseeable consequences of the actions.
 
#93,846
#93,846
luthervol said:
lol.........
Reckless endangerment is a crime consisting of acts that create a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person. The accused person isn't required to intend the resulting or potential harm, but must have acted in a way that showed a disregard for the foreseeable consequences of the actions.
Click to expand...

I never said that I couldn't be held responsible for putting you in danger by behaving recklessly. I'm just not responsible in the least for your safety.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and NorthDallas40
#93,847
#93,847
hog88 said:
I never said that I couldn't be held responsible for putting you in danger by behaving recklessly. I'm just not responsible in the least for your safety.
Click to expand...
lol.
If your are not reasonably responsible for another's safety, how can you be held responsible for unreasonably putting them in danger?

You may tie yourself in more knots than anyone I know due to your hatred of the reasonable and necessary constraints of societal living.
 
#93,848
#93,848
hog88 said:
I never said that I couldn't be held responsible for putting you in danger by behaving recklessly. I'm just not responsible in the least for your safety.
Click to expand...
And I’d like to see them try a prove a sham reckless endangerment claim because people won’t get vaccinated. That level of over reach would push us over the brink of civil war. Not just the citizens but many states would rebel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky_Top_Vol13, 82_VOL_83 and SpaceCoastVol
#93,849
#93,849
luthervol said:
lol.
If your are not reasonably responsible for another's safety, how can you be held responsible for unreasonably putting them in danger?

You may tie yourself in more knots than anyone I know due to your hatred of the reasonable and necessary constraints of societal living.
Click to expand...
Get back to us when you have a precedent for a reckless endangerment charge on an unvaccinated person. Until then **** off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL, Rickyvol77, 82_VOL_83 and 4 others
#93,850
#93,850
luthervol said:
lol.
If your are not reasonably responsible for another's safety, how can you be held responsible for unreasonably putting them in danger?

You may tie yourself in more knots than anyone I know due to your hatred of the reasonable and necessary constraints of societal living.
Click to expand...

I'm not responsible for your safety. I'm only responsible for my actions. See the difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top