Arizona Election Audit

Read the case again. You've posted this argument many times before. One would've thought you'd realize how ignorant it is and stop posting it. Yet you continue to double down with it. After all this, I'm the stupid one. SMH.

Your hero lost man. Fair and square. Give it up. You look pathetic groveling at his feet, praying they will call him the winner even though he lost in a rout
 

😂 only dems have access to Craigslist posting, must be legit.
 
So is it unfounded to call for an in depth investigation of Hunter Biden and his shady business dealings while his dad was VP?

And I disagree with your summary btw. Trump should have been censured. The whole impeachment, really both impeachments, were petty political moves with little to no merit. The guy was an ass? So what? The frenzied butt hurt expressed by the left while he was in office was unlike anything I've seen before.

Yeah like impeaching a guy for lying about a bj? I happen to think this one had a little more merit.
 
LOL

So in your view there are different levels of perjury?

I happen to think when confronted with cheating on your wife... the natural reaction is to lie.


Not from experience mind you, but if I had ever cheated on a SO, I think I'd probably lie about it.
 
Yeah like impeaching a guy for lying about a bj? I happen to think this one had a little more merit.
He lied under oath. In sexual harassment deposition about his affinity for sexually harassing underlings. A BJ from a current underling seems highly relevant. Oh and perjury is perjury.
 
It's not about this election; this is about elections down the road. As you say this one is in the books, it's not going to change. I've worked a few nuclear plant issues in which our testing uncovered a problem that existed since day one - this despite all the certifications and pre-operational and post-operational tests - and the fact that the system or component appeared to have worked as designed for a period of years. It happens with complex operations, and in almost every case there was no intention of wrongdoing. Simple benign example - write a long technical paper, correct the errors, and I'll assure you there will still be another.

Look at the VW diesel emissions software scandal; it completely passed muster, tons of cars were sold, and the software was rigged - nobody caught it. The cars worked seemingly correctly, but they weren't. It took an after the fact hard look at the system and software when somebody caught on and called BS. You better believe the certification process is covering that particular base for next time.
Yeah but this isnt a true third party review. This is a review by someone who has a vested interest in one side.

This is company A "inspecting" company B and saying company B doesnt work and you should buy company A, because trust us.

And you really believe this audit could possibly produce actionable changes that would improve the system? Cause right now its geared up to be a mud slinging contest that will look no farther than the results they want, and have walked into the situation looking for. A real inspection like you talk about has no bias, this is nothing but bias.
 
That wasn't unfounded either. The facts show that Trump withheld aid to the Ukraine in order to pressure their president (Zelensky) into announcing an investigation into the Bidens... which basically amounted to being a campaign favor for his re-election bid. But that has been discussed ad nauseam. I'm not rehashing that again.

This was after Biden withheld even more money from ukraine until they dropped the investigation against his son. Trump was guilty of the same thing Biden was just to a lesser amount.
 
Pence is a closeted homosexual. There's nothing wrong with being gay and it doesn't mean he would've been bad at managing the Corona crisis (he woulda been much better than Trump), but it is unhealthy to be closeted and it is weird to make fighting gay rights your priority when you are gay yourself

as for Biden? all politicians kiss babies, especially old school ones and he's definitely OLD school
Dear heavens, I’ve tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but you are an bloviating idiot. 9/10ths of the stuff you say has no backing in reality.
At this point you are just a factless blowhard and worthy of every bit of scorn you get.
 
He lied under oath. In sexual harassment deposition about his affinity for sexually harassing underlings. A BJ from a current underling seems highly relevant. Oh and perjury is perjury.

Gosh, I missed where he was impeached for sexual harassment.
 
Bad argument CW.

My argument is that lying about screwing around on your wife really isn't an impeachable offense in my book. I didn't think trump was shown to have done was impeachable either. The argument here was from weezer who said he'd never seen anything like the trump impeachments. I was merely pointing out that Rs had done some similar before.
 
Trolling I see.

Not trolling... He was impeached for saying "there is nothing going on between us." and "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the—if he—if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement."
 
My argument is that lying about screwing around on your wife really isn't an impeachable offense in my book. I didn't think trump was shown to have done was impeachable either. The argument here was from weezer who said he'd never seen anything like the trump impeachments. I was merely pointing out that Rs had done some similar before.
Lying under oath is perjury. His impeachment wasn't about adultery. It was about perjury. It's a bad argument.

Taking advantage of someone under your and using your power as president is bad.. When asked, you lie? That's impeachable. And I liked Clinton as president.
 
My argument is that lying about screwing around on your wife really isn't an impeachable offense in my book. I didn't think trump was shown to have done was impeachable either. The argument here was from weezer who said he'd never seen anything like the trump impeachments. I was merely pointing out that Rs had done some similar before.

Would you be disbarred if you lied under oath about cheating on your wife?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Not trolling... He was impeached for saying "there is nothing going on between us." and "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the—if he—if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement."

you offer a counter-opinion and they call it 'trolling'... no sweat
 
Not trolling... He was impeached for saying "there is nothing going on between us." and "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the—if he—if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement."

So perjury isn't perjury? Where's the line for us normal average citizens?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

Advertisement



Back
Top