Proof of the election fraud

#701
#701
VolinWayne said:
If the graphs that they have produced are a true reflection of the actual votes, this is absolute proof. The anomalies are irrefutable. You shouldn't be able to plug in the same number in every single county in a state and predict the outcome.
Click to expand...
You claimed

His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.
Click to expand...

That's the easiest thing to prove if true. No need for graphs that may/may not show the irregularities you seek

Thing is, that claim was made early on and was easily debunked
 
#702
#702
luthervol said:
Russia undoubtedly interfered, the probability that the interference cost Hillary the election is greater than the probability that voter fraud cost Trump the election, even though voter fraud undoubtedly happened......as it always has and always will.

Which means the probability that Trump lost simply because he sucks is greater.
Click to expand...

Numerous people, including Trump's own suck-up Attorney
General, William Barr, have publicly stated that the amount of voter fraud was far too small for deciding the election, that it had no effect on the outcome. Trump's phone call to the Florida Electoral commissioner made it clear that Trump had no information to offer. Trump just told the man to find him the exact number of votes he needed to win. It is clear that Trump tried to overthrow an election he lost. That's the plain and simple story of his own misconduct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#703
#703
Vol Main said:
Do not even pretend that you know the systems and procedures or that you were there to observe the things you claim to know so much about. There are always individuals who do not know what they are talking about, who criticize with cheap shots the work of good people who do know their jobs. You should know better.
Click to expand...


Just watch the video. I'm pretty sure Dr. Frank's is qualified to discuss numbers. He's a data scientist
 
#704
#704
Vol Main said:
Numerous people, including Trump's own suck-up Attorney
General, William Barr, have publicly stated that the amount of voter fraud was far too small for deciding the election, that it had no effect on the outcome. Trump's phone call to the Florida Electoral commissioner made it clear that Trump had no information to offer. Trump just told the man to find him the exact number of votes he needed to win. It is clear that Trump tried to overthrow an election he lost. That's the plain and simple story of his own misconduct.
Click to expand...


Are you talking about Trumps phone call with Brad Raffensperger??
 
#705
#705
VolinWayne said:
Just watch the video. I'm pretty sure Dr. Frank's is qualified to discuss numbers. He's a data scientist
Click to expand...
Where is it listed he is a data scientist? The girl doing the FL dashboards also claimed to be a data scientist without any real qualifications. Heck I have a couple of certs that would likely qualify me as one too
 
#706
#706
VolinWayne said:
Just watch the video. I'm pretty sure Dr. Frank's is qualified to discuss numbers. He's a data scientist
Click to expand...

I did watch the video. How can he be well qualified to analyze voting patterns without including the history of voting patterns? One scientist has the last word on nothing. Was his work peer reviewed before it was made public? No. Would other data scientists and election historians just rubber stamp his conclusions? No, they would most certainly question them. You and I are not data scientists or election historians, so what are our qualifications to judge his work? I have analyzed elections for many years, as an amateur, and the man's presentation does not appear at all conclusive to me.
 
#709
#709
utvolpj said:
Again, what qualifications? Modeling really isn't really that hard

A simple list of the counties with more votes than citizens would be infinitely more powerful
Click to expand...

You asked where is he listed as a data scientist. I answered the question you asked
 
#710
#710
VolinWayne said:
You asked where is he listed as a data scientist. I answered the question you asked
Click to expand...
No you didn't. You provided a strange blog that simply posts his stuff and a bio that contains no mention of data science
 
#711
#711
utvolpj said:
No you didn't. You provided a strange blog that simply posts his stuff and a bio that contains no mention of data science
Click to expand...


My apologies. He's a scientist/mathematician


Dr. Douglas G. Frank is the scientist/mathematician behind this blog
 
#713
#713
luthervol said:
What are you talking about?
I always said they undoubtedly interfered to Trump's benefit, and that I hoped it was enough to sway the result.
Click to expand...
Interfered? Do you mean like physically flipping votes or changing votes? Or do you mean buying ads on social media?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#714
#714
luthervol said:
A whopping 20 votes cast fraudulent will turn an election.
Click to expand...

So if you really think 20 fraudulent votes can turn an election, don't you think it makes sense to keep fraudulent votes out of the system? Do you have a plan to do that without keeping track of ballots, who handles them, and who selects the candidates? Why should a ballot be less secure than your credit card, or do you not object to someone else using that from time to time? If you keep your credit card on your person, your number to yourself, and rely on sellers to keep your info secure, then how could you think the idiocy that passed for secure mail it in voting was reasonable?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeGoose, Orangeburst, Rickyvol77 and 3 others
#717
#717
luthervol said:
Russia undoubtedly interfered, the probability that the interference cost Hillary the election is greater than the probability that voter fraud cost Trump the election, even though voter fraud undoubtedly happened......as it always has and always will.

Which means the probability that Trump lost simply because he sucks is greater.
Click to expand...
It’s an absolute that you’re FOS
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeGoose, Rickyvol77, VolinWayne and 4 others
#718
#718
AM64 said:
So if you really think 20 fraudulent votes can turn an election, don't you think it makes sense to keep fraudulent votes out of the system? Do you have a plan to do that without keeping track of ballots, who handles them, and who selects the candidates? Why should a ballot be less secure than your credit card, or do you not object to someone else using that from time to time? If you keep your credit card on your person, your number to yourself, and rely on sellers to keep your info secure, then how could you think the idiocy that passed for secure mail it in voting was reasonable?
Click to expand...
I don't think that. Read the post to which I was responding.
 
#722
#722
Very interesting interview with Jovan Pulitzer done by Professor David Clements. It's kind of long but it's worth your time. To those who don't know who Jovan is, he invented barcodes and he owns thousands of patents. Very qualified to make the assessments he is making

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer - EXPOSING FRAUD and Restoring FAITH in Elections

I am joined by a modern day Benjamin Franklin. Jovan Hutton Pulitzer is a world renowned entrepreneur, inventor, and most importantly, a PATRIOT. Jovan holds HUNDREDS of patents on technology used by billions of people around the world. He is also the chief authority on kinematic artifact scanning. He can detect a myriad of different forms of fraud on any piece of paper. This includes ELECTION BALLOTS. Meet the most feared expert in the world that every corrupt politician is trying to stop. Our country's future hangs in the balance. We address it all on this episode of The Professor's Record.

You can find me at theprofessorsrecord.com and at The Professor's Record.

You can find Jovan Hutton Pulitzer at JovanHuttonPulitzer
and Official Jovan Hutton Pulitzer Bio
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNVOLNAVY
#725
#725
VolinWayne said:
Modem Chips Embedded in Voting System Computer Motherboards - Lets Fix Stuff
Click to expand...

A modem on the motherboard would kind of blow the theory that auditors and others really know how things work and voting systems are all nailed down and not subject to change. If that's really a system card, just about anyone with a bit of computer hardware experience could have found it - no special talent at all other than craning you neck to look around which obviously the "experts" didn't do. Of course, the worse scenario is that the "independent auditors" did know.

Now the other part. What they show is not a motherboard - that's a modem board that plugs into other hardware. It's possible that it was done in a manner to simply transmit tabulated vote counts, but that can only be proven through analysis of the hardware and software. In any case the audits that involved simply running batches of data to see if the output was correct would never show either the presence of the modem or the function. Think back to the VW engine emission cheating scandal. The system operated one way in use and another in test mode - all it takes is one command signal to change operating modes in a system designed to cheat. VW got away with it over the course of thousands of emissions tests - including the certification process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top