Proof of the election fraud

1. WWII (and it’s aftermath) made America a superpower. Before then we were a face in the crowd. Save your grandstanding.

2. I find it frigin hilarious that you list freedom of religion and christian values literally right next to each other. This board is full of special people.

#1. This is my belief and I'm sticking with it.

#2. Speaking historically about Christian values. What we mostly have in modern America is more like satanist values (abortion, murder, immorality, greed, commercialized sex, etc.). Fortunately, there are still good people from all religions mixed in throughout the country.
 
3e1f2223b7608599c1e602194d04782f.jpg
 
Lots of affidavits and evidence here that anybody can look. This is the evidence that the courts refused to look at for the most part

NOTE: Over 240 unique pieces of evidence specific to Michigan is posted so far.Unlike the majority of posts on this site, this post will be updated repeatedly to reflect categorization, additional affidavits and related evidence.

LAST UPDATE 3/15/2021
Michigan Election Fraud Evidence - Lets Fix Stuff
 
This is something completely different in addition to what Mike put out a few months ago.




On March 31st, Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, released a one-hour television special entitled, Scientific Proof: Internationally Renowned Physicist Absolutely Proves 2020 Election Was Biggest Cyber-Crime in World History.

The special broadcast features Dr. Douglas Frank who holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry for the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific publications. In 1990 Dr. Frank discovered and invented a technique for creating three dimensional images of molecules resting on surfaces. This led to a cover article in Science Magazine, which is the most read science magazine in the world by scientists, and he was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in Europe.

Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 election following the data of the election returns county by county across such states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few. Dr. Frank’s scientific and mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber fraud in the 2020 election.

In the television special Dr. Frank testifies to host Mike Lindell that deviations and mathematical impossibilities could not have been done by humans, by artificial intelligence and computers that were running before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. election.

Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national census data was used to manipulate the 2020 election rolls and to inject phantom votes into the election totals. His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.

The injection of the 2010 national census data into the 2020 election rolls facilitated a crime that some experts are calling the largest cyber-crime in world history.

Dr. Frank explains that the 2010 census was used to actually cast votes for voters that had either passed away or no longer lived in the county or state.

In numerous documented cases, voters showed up to vote at their precinct only to be told they had already voted, when in fact, they had not voted. What is now being revealed by the scientific investigation of Dr. Frank is that these Americans had their vote cast for them through a highly sophisticated computer program.

In this television special, Dr. Frank explains to Mike Lindell what tipped him off that a cyber-crime had been committed — not in just a few precincts, counties or swing states, but on a national basis. Dr. Frank also reveals that even in the states President Trump won, the President won those states by larger numbers than was reported.

Scientific Proof is the follow up to the two hour docuMovie, Absolute Proof, that was released on February 5, 2021, and was seen by 70 million people in the first four days of its release, and over 150 million to date across 42 countries. Like Absolute Proof, the executive producers of Scientific Proof are Mike Lindell, Brannon Howse and Mary Fanning and was filmed by WVW Broadcast Network, and directed by Brannon Howse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeGoose
His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.
That is about the easiest thing to prove. Where's the list?
 
That is about the easiest thing to prove. Where's the list?


Just out of curiosity did you watch this video? There is pretty damning evidence that Dr. Douglas Frank has put together that shows that there was a computer algorithm that was used. I do agree, I'm hoping he will show a lot more of the actual data that he used, which I think he will. I think his plan is to use his new platform in the next few months to get all of his findings out there.
 
That is about the easiest thing to prove. Where's the list?
Yep. Do I think some shenanigans went on? Yeah, probably. There’s too many anomalies and things that just don’t make sense. However, without irrefutable proof there’s nothing that can be done. Trump had the same problem that we often see from the liberals. He cried wolf on so many things that turned out not to be true that it distracted from any potentially true fraud. Fast forward to now and, fair or not, any claims of fraud mean you’re in bed with Trump and are immediately dismissed. I think it’s likely something happened too but I’ve accepted that we will never know what actually happened outside of the election rigging collusion bragged about in Time magazine. So at this point it’s sh1t or get off the pot. If you have concrete proof don’t dress it up, dance around, or try to spin it in any way. Just put the hard evidence on the table and let everyone interpret it with their own eyes.
 
Once again, I'm not among the crowd trying to make the case that Donald Trump won the 2020 Presidential election. That would be posters such as @VolnJC, @VolinWayne and @BigOrangeTrain.

The only narrative that I need is that Joe Biden currently resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave in Washington D.C., while Donald Trump is cooling his heels among the geriatric jet set in Palm Beach, Florida.
You got the end result you wanted. The rest doesn’t matter. I see that allot these days.
 
You got the end result you wanted. The rest doesn’t matter. I see that allot these days.

Elections were recounted in several states, and then recounted again. I'm talking about hand counts, with poll watchers from both parties present. Now we see people who do not know procedures and were not even there, acting like they know all about the elections. Add some computer guy who was not there and without knowledge of historical voting patterns talking like he knows all about it. I'll stand by the people who worked hard to do a good job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Yep. Do I think some shenanigans went on? Yeah, probably. There’s too many anomalies and things that just don’t make sense. However, without irrefutable proof there’s nothing that can be done. Trump had the same problem that we often see from the liberals. He cried wolf on so many things that turned out not to be true that it distracted from any potentially true fraud. Fast forward to now and, fair or not, any claims of fraud mean you’re in bed with Trump and are immediately dismissed. I think it’s likely something happened too but I’ve accepted that we will never know what actually happened outside of the election rigging collusion bragged about in Time magazine. So at this point it’s sh1t or get off the pot. If you have concrete proof don’t dress it up, dance around, or try to spin it in any way. Just put the hard evidence on the table and let everyone interpret it with their own eyes.
I said it in November, they need a body, a murder weapon, video tape and a confession to over turn the election. The algorithm stuff they are showing would be only enough to be considered circumstantial evidence that can be dismissed by the other side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and hUTch2002
It is far more probable that Hillary lost in 2016 because of Russian interference than that Trump lost in 2020 because of voter fraud.
 
It is far more probable that Hillary lost in 2016 because of Russian interference than that Trump lost in 2020 because of voter fraud.
So now you think that is probable that the Ruskies stole the election? That's a little progress, I guess.
 
So now you think that is probable that the Ruskies stole the election? That's a little progress, I guess.
What are you talking about?
I always said they undoubtedly interfered to Trump's benefit, and that I hoped it was enough to sway the result.
 
Elections were recounted in several states, and then recounted again. I'm talking about hand counts, with poll watchers from both parties present. Now we see people who do not know procedures and were not even there, acting like they know all about the elections. Add some computer guy who was not there and without knowledge of historical voting patterns talking like he knows all about it. I'll stand by the people who worked hard to do a good job.


Lol at good job
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeGoose
Lol at good job

Do not even pretend that you know the systems and procedures or that you were there to observe the things you claim to know so much about. There are always individuals who do not know what they are talking about, who criticize with cheap shots the work of good people who do know their jobs. You should know better.
 
I said it in November, they need a body, a murder weapon, video tape and a confession to over turn the election. The algorithm stuff they are showing would be only enough to be considered circumstantial evidence that can be dismissed by the other side.


If the graphs that they have produced are a true reflection of the actual votes, this is absolute proof. The anomalies are irrefutable. You shouldn't be able to plug in the same number in every single county in a state and predict the outcome.
 
undoubtedly and probable are not the same. My bad, I thought you were starting to understand(by the tiniest of margins), she lost because she sucked.
Russia undoubtedly interfered, the probability that the interference cost Hillary the election is greater than the probability that voter fraud cost Trump the election, even though voter fraud undoubtedly happened......as it always has and always will.

Which means the probability that Trump lost simply because he sucks is greater.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top