Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
We should be playing 10 conference games a year. Remove divisions in SEC like we do in basketball. Let the 1 play the 2 in the SEC championship game. No permanent cross division games like Tennessee vs Alabama. The other 2 games should be one cupcake and one P5.
After this past season, I love the idea of 10 conference games every year, but I doubt it ever happens.
 
After this past season, I love the idea of 10 conference games every year, but I doubt it ever happens.
Absolutely agree because it allows a team to slip up and lose more than a single game without completely being eliminated for the SEC championship like what usually happens...
 
Absolutely not. Its a bloodbath every year. Make the playing field a little more even for once.
I am old school. If you would have asked me five years ago, I would have said, "hell no." We ain't scared. My opinion has changed. It is a huge disadvantage for us compared to the rest of the East to have to play them every year. It is time for that to change.
 
Anarchy, let's do it.
Only CFB has this obsession that the best team must be the champion at the end.

Sure, the regular season "matters more", but at the cost of being completely predictable. Bama, Clemson, OSU, Oklahoma. 2 of the 4 at least will be there every year, so how does that make the regular season mean more again?

CBB has the format exactly right. Regular season is still important. Conference championship means more (aka Bama can't lose to Auburn on purpose to get a bye any more). Doesn't have to be 64 teams but should be at least 16. The team that wins the championship is the team that puts the best 3-4 games together when it matters most. If you are concerned about the best teams taking games off, work it to where there are four byes or double byes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crazyguy
I am old school. If you would have asked me five years ago, I would have said, "hell no." We ain't scared. My opinion has changed. It is a huge disadvantage for us compared to the rest of the East to have to play them every year. It is time for that to change.
Yeah me too..... traditions have been moved around so much now that I don’t care as much as I use too.
 
I am old school. If you would have asked me five years ago, I would have said, "hell no." We ain't scared. My opinion has changed. It is a huge disadvantage for us compared to the rest of the East to have to play them every year. It is time for that to change.
All we have to do is get to the point where we are good enough to beat Bama every third year or so, and Nick Saban will stroll down to the SEC office and get that **** changed for us in half of his hour long lunch break.

I'm only being semi sarcastic. If we beat Bama in 09 like we should have and cost Saban a championship, that **** would have been gone in 2010.
 
Only CFB has this obsession that the best team must be the champion at the end.

Sure, the regular season "matters more", but at the cost of being completely predictable. Bama, Clemson, OSU, Oklahoma. 2 of the 4 at least will be there every year, so how does that make the regular season mean more again?

CBB has the format exactly right. Regular season is still important. Conference championship means more (aka Bama can't lose to Auburn on purpose to get a bye any more). Doesn't have to be 64 teams but should be at least 16. The team that wins the championship is the team that puts the best 3-4 games together when it matters most. If you are concerned about the best teams taking games off, work it to where there are four byes or double byes.
I don't disagree, I think it would bring more parity to the sport. I like 12 if there is a good way to work it. Top 2 in each P5 and 2 at large. Have the conference championship games as the first round and go from there. I think it would also keep fans interested for longer as well, because unless your team is one of the big 4 or undefeated once you lose a game there's nothing to play for. But if you still had a chance to win your division or finish top 2 there's still plenty to play for.

Lastly, I also don't understand why we don't do it when FCS has a solid model that works well. The only 4 that should be against going to that model should be the top 4 which are pretty much guaranteed spots every year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob
  • Like
Reactions: ugg
Only CFB has this obsession that the best team must be the champion at the end.

Sure, the regular season "matters more", but at the cost of being completely predictable. Bama, Clemson, OSU, Oklahoma. 2 of the 4 at least will be there every year, so how does that make the regular season mean more again?

CBB has the format exactly right. Regular season is still important. Conference championship means more (aka Bama can't lose to Auburn on purpose to get a bye any more). Doesn't have to be 64 teams but should be at least 16. The team that wins the championship is the team that puts the best 3-4 games together when it matters most. If you are concerned about the best teams taking games off, work it to where there are four byes or double byes.
Bama has never lost to Auburn “on purpose”. That’s your goofy conspiracy side taking dominance.
 


tumblr_o2dvpqs4iT1uqe8iio1_500.gif
 
Yeah me too..... traditions have been moved around so much now that I don’t care as much as I use too.
There was a time when Auburn was an annual opponent and both UGA/Florida weren’t. Was a great tradition...we adjusted. I’m against ending the Third Saturday In October tradition...but I’d adjust.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top