Eh. To Be Honest I think we wound up with the better of the two for our current situation.
The boxes that would've been preferred to be checked in a new coach were:
1. A current HC: Heupel checks that box Elliott doesn't
2. A HC who has developed a program before: Neither checks the box.
3. A coach who can develop players: Heupel definitely checks this box with this background. You can't really make the case for Elliott as he has always had elite talent to work with.
4. A coach who can do a lot with a little: Once again Heupel displayed this with the talent level he had at UCF (7th in recruiting for the conference and finished 1st, 2nd and 4th). Once again you can't say this about Elliott.
5. A coach who is a good developer of men and a role model for the players: I believe both check off this box.
6. Recruiting: Elliott as of right now I believe way outshines Heupel in recruiting.
The most important boxes in my mind were 1-5 which I believe Heupel has more of than Elliott. The only thing Elliott could've really brought to the table that Heupel doesn't inherently bring is recruiting. But guys we got sold on our last coach/coaching staff on their recruiting prowess and that worked out like crap. Could Elliott do better? We may never know.
More than likely Elliott is going to get a job at a high profile opening where he walks into a program with talent ready to compete for championships like Kirby or he may just take over for Swinny after he leaves. If that's the case he will have instant success and we will have several in this fan base saying look at what we could have had but that is not an indicator in any sense that he could've been successful in our current situation here.