Democrats plan to introduce articles of impeachment as early as Monday

#1,227
#1,227
LMFAO Roberts isn’t gonna preside over the upcoming sham impeachment trial show planned instead they’re gonna let Senator Leahy preside. Even more proof what a farce this is. The damn “neutral” judge is an opposition Senator!!

AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, VolStrom and Sea Ray
#1,228
#1,228
Good for Justice Roberts. This trial is now officially a farce

I expect Biden to come out sometime in the next couple of weeks and say that he doesn't support the trial because he's a uniter and all...but that's BS. He'll only come out against it when he sees that it's going to go down
 
#1,229
#1,229
Sea Ray said:
Good for Justice Roberts. This trial is now officially a farce

I expect Biden to come out sometime in the next couple of weeks and say that he doesn't support the trial because he's a uniter and all...but that's BS. He'll only come out against it when he sees that it's going to go down
Click to expand...

Biden isn't coming out and saying anything like that. He could have squashed this on the QT if he wanted to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and hUTch2002
#1,230
#1,230
hog88 said:
Biden isn't coming out and saying anything like that. He could have squashed this on the QT if he wanted to.
Click to expand...

Exactly. He had a chance to be a uniter and squash this in his Inauguration speech. Instead he ignored it. He hasn't taken an official stance. He is a swampy, wimp of a politician. He will come out against it when it's Dead on Arrival anyway. It'll be like the Russians declaring war on the Japs after we'd already kicked their a$$.
 
#1,234
#1,234
sk012521dAPR20210123084507.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, AM64, CagleMtnVol and 5 others
#1,236
#1,236
clarksvol00 said:
The validity of a post-presidency impeachment is not something I've had time to read about, but I'm interested in it. Grant's secretary of war seems like as good a place as any. I know there is a lawyer named Turley from GWU or somewhere like that who is arguing its not possible, but he may also have a law review article from the Clinton era saying otherwise.
Click to expand...
That SOW hadn’t completed his term while Trump did. This is the same as impeaching W. Is that allowed?
 
#1,237
#1,237
clarksvol00 said:
What happened last week was a possible attempt to threaten the peaceful transition of power and it warrants scrutiny. However, I don't think it will be successful and for that reason I don't think it's a good idea. Not even six months, but six weeks ago I'd have said go for it. I'm sure McConnell wants him barred from running again, but he'll vote no if he can't get the votes.
Click to expand...
Pelosi didn’t seem to think that was the case when the WI state Capitol was stormed in 2011. If we don’t tear this 2 party apart now it’s going to tear our country apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol and davethevol
#1,240
#1,240
Boca Vol said:
What a douchebag! Anyone else watching this SH*Tshow?

Their main point is Trump said he won the election. Uh, See Democrats in 2016-2020!
Click to expand...

The media tried to make us watch it. They all went to it with their Special Reports at 7pm. I've got 300 channels to choose from. Hell no I didn't watch that SH-Show. I really don't understand what the Democrats expect to gain by this. It doesn't unite the country. It doesn't gain them votes. It doesn't help them at the polls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#1,241
#1,241
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Once a sourpuss ..... she stays a sourpuss. Hates everyone. Maxine is a hateful vengeful person. Sad life for her.

View attachment 343759
Click to expand...

I used to work with this woman's twin sister. I won't get into the details, but when I had my first encounter with her she shook her head side to side and said "it's about damn time".
Good times and memories as I look back over my career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#1,245
#1,245
SpaceCoastVol said:
I guess due process doesn't apply to Mr Trump. The house/senate get to present charges and 'evidence' and Mr Trump does not get to dispute/argue that? This country is in serious jeopardy if this kangaroo court is allowed to continue.

Trump 2024.
Click to expand...


They still don't understand that a lot of the reason for the support Trump has gotten is because of how the swamp has treated him. This does nothing but galvanize his base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#1,246
#1,246
VolinWayne said:
They still don't understand that a lot of the reason for the support Trump has gotten is because of how the swamp has treated him. This does nothing but galvanize his base.
Click to expand...

I think they understand. The media and the national politicians entrenched in the political system thrive when there is division. I think the point is to divide. Win or lose the WH, CNN/Fox News do great when there is an opposing bogeyman. Win or lose the WH, Nancy Pelosi/Ted Cruz do great when there is an opposing bogeyman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, hUTch2002 and VolinWayne
#1,248
#1,248
I believe that anyone saying there is no legal basis and strong case for impeachment is lying. I'm talking about premeditated, deliberate lying, by saying something they know is not true.
 
#1,249
#1,249
n_huffhines said:
I think they understand. The media and the national politicians entrenched in the political system thrive when there is division. I think the point is to divide. Win or lose the WH, CNN/Fox News do great when there is an opposing bogeyman. Win or lose the WH, Nancy Pelosi/Ted Cruz do great when there is an opposing bogeyman.
Click to expand...

kinda like the old Soviet Union versus us - people overlooked a lot of our bad behavior because we were better than the Soviet bogeyman.

regardless of the outcome of this political action, Trump will be gone and the Dems foil lost. will be interesting to see who the media chooses as the new one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top