I think it's really easy to read two headlines (or Google searches), remember the beat downs and the trash talk, and come to the conclusion that someone is an awful, evil person.
We are all drawing conclusions about people based on coaching records and saying how good or bad they are as a coach. That's fine because this is just a game.
Saying someone was complicit in rape based on mostly refuted testimony is totally different, and it doesn't make you a good person to attack them on those grounds based on little to no actual information.
But that's the last post I'll have on the subject unless we hire him. Still don't think it's Franklin.