sona
Safety...Always Off.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2016
- Messages
- 4,456
- Likes
- 7,960
Hooker came here because we were his only P5 opportunityI am fully convinced that no one knows anything. It is all conjecture. All we can do is wait.
What we do know is this has been handled poorly from a PR point of view.
My biggest question is, If things are so bad, why did Hooker sign with UT? He had lots of options. He is not all world, but he is a solid QB. With all the dysfunction being discussed in media and social media, why did he pick UT?
Cliffs
He probably looked at our two returning QB's and figured he was better than both and sees a clear path to start here. Doesn't matter who the coach is.I am fully convinced that no one knows anything. It is all conjecture. All we can do is wait.
What we do know is this has been handled poorly from a PR point of view.
My biggest question is, If things are so bad, why did Hooker sign with UT? He had lots of options. He is not all world, but he is a solid QB. With all the dysfunction being discussed in media and social media, why did he pick UT?
Previous coach at Kansas. It was the way Kansas went about firing him and replacing him with Miles..I apologize if this question has been asked before but I’m not familiar with the David Beaty reference?
Maybe I’m in the minority here, but I don’t think you have to be a great coach to have success at Tennessee. Easy to recruit to, and there’s only a handful of programs across the country who can provide better resources. A good coach can win 8-10 year in and year out. Find a special QB every few years, and you can take it to another level. I think Napier could be that guy.
CLIFFNOTES
0) Notes that Pruitt's status was an open secret since we backed out of the Liberty Bowl and we weren't hiring replacements, not surprising.
1) Tennessee is engaging in a David Beaty-esque situation, because we straight up do not have the cash to afford the full buyout.
2) Suggests that Tennessee raises our hands and say "we have done bad" to get ahead of the NCAA investigation that would come with pulling a David Beaty.
3) The value of the Tennessee job will be clearer after the investigation (long, long-winded response to this question so I summed it up.)
4) Steven/Host wants Gus but the caller suggests it could only work if Gus could bring an Auburn level staff, but notes that Gus would only come with some serious cash/competition incentives.
5) Comes back to the David Beaty situation, really makes note this investigation, and our handling of it, could seriously cost us with candidates like Napier, Campbell and more.
6) Rambles about Vandy, but notes that Clark Lea is making sure Nashville is a priority (not good for Tennessee bc Nashville really is booming and a future hot spot of recruiting IMO)
My big takeaway? I think we're underselling how serious the investigation & David Beaty-esque situation we are in. To me it seems like Freeze would be the first & possibly only person to take this job even with the issues we're facing.
I thought the same thing. Does Trey not know what a service agreement or contract is? We know what the lawyers are getting paid now...cool.I'm not sure what kind of "news" Trey is trying to make this. This is just a standard agreement letter for their services. I guess showing it started late November.....which we all already knew.