this is another thing i was thinking about....
so, we're waitng on the results of this investigation to guide our decision here...let's say the investigation doesn't turn up enough to do anything and we decide to keep him....how motivated exactly do you think pruitt is at that point? we're supposedly actively looking for reasons to fire him with cause, and since we can't, congratulations, you get to keep your job? psht.
i'd tank next year, you'd have to fire me, and i'm getting my $10M...or whatever it is, and all i'm losing is a year.
this whole thing is just stupid. the people over there, the whole lot of them--admin, president, chancellor, donors involved in the decision making process...all of them.....are morons, or at the very least very indecisive....and you've definitely cut the knees out from under your AD if he's really advocating for pruitt at this point...cause clearly there's enough folks that matter that disagree.....
ish or get off the pot, because how this is being handled is ludicrous. keep him...fine, you can explain that away with covid, quarantines yada, yada, yada and move on to a 'normal' year and see what happens.
fire him, fine...2 losing seasons in 3 years...no one blinks an eye and you cut bait and move on....
either way at least you've declared a direction and can move on.
doing nothing? while you wait on an investigation to conclude? MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER. and i don't see any resolution to this that we come out on top....