Which is kind of the point I've been making. Any hire we make will be risky, but that doesn't mean don't make it. I'd take Freeze, Napier, Chadwell, or certainly Campbell, because at least the potential is there to be better. I don't think any of them should be written off as "not good enough", but at the same time, I don't think any of them should be seen as "guarantees". And really, Freeze is the only one being talked about that way. I think the guy is a great coach, but I also think he's being overhyped on the board. He's William Wallace, 7 feet tall, shooting lightning bolts out his arse according to some. If he were to be the hire, I'd hope he came in and tore it up, but to act like he's a guarantee to do it, I just don't agree. I think he'd be better than Pruitt, but he's not gonna magically put us on par with Florida and Georgia. That's gonna take time.