Challenge To Those That Want Pruitt Fired

#1

volsack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
433
Likes
373
#1
We've all been debating and speculating on the future of Jeremy Pruitt for what seems like forever now, with no real agreement on what will happen or how it will play out. What we do know is that to buy out Pruitt and the staff it will cost about $19.2 million dollars, plus roughly another $20 million to buy out the new staff from their respective schools. We also know that UT only has about $10 million is reserves and is facing a significant financial loss this year, which may or may not prevent them from firing/hiring a new coach.

As has been expressed by multiple posters in multiple threads, people who want Pruitt replaced or think "Tennessee is at crossroads" if we don't make a change soon, would pay to see UT fire Pruitt and hire someone new (a totally different debate for another thread). My challenge to all of those people is: put up or shut up; stop talking about what you would do and actually do it. Start an official GoFundMe to raise money towards donating to the school to fund the buyout. If you raise enough money, you would become a "Big Money Donor." You could elect a speaker that represents who you want as a coach, and get a seat at the table and actually have a say like the Haslam's, etc.

Doing this would do multiple things: 1) It would shut the national media up about how the fans vetoed a coaching hire on social media, because this time the fan base actually nutted up and brought something to the table. 2) It would in essence make UT a community owned team like the Packers. Instead of actual shares, A non-profit could be created with an elected board, and if it kept enough money, it could contribute to donations, endowment funds and other things to keep a seat at the table. 3) It would change the landscape of college athletics and create more equity. The balance of power would shift from the few elites to the common many. Schools would be forced to listen to everyone, not just a handful of "mega-boosters."

I doubt anything comes of this, but I'm tired of people fighting about hypotheticals and what they would do if they had the chance. Here's your chance, either do it or shut up about it.
 
#2
#2
We've all been debating and speculating on the future of Jeremy Pruitt for what seems like forever now, with no real agreement on what will happen or how it will play out. What we do know is that to buy out Pruitt and the staff it will cost about $19.2 million dollars, plus roughly another $20 million to buy out the new staff from their respective schools. We also know that UT only has about $10 million is reserves and is facing a significant financial loss this year, which may or may not prevent them from firing/hiring a new coach.

As has been expressed by multiple posters in multiple threads, people who want Pruitt replaced or think "Tennessee is at crossroads" if we don't make a change soon, would pay to see UT fire Pruitt and hire someone new (a totally different debate for another thread). My challenge to all of those people is: put up or shut up; stop talking about what you would do and actually do it. Start an official GoFundMe to raise money towards donating to the school to fund the buyout. If you raise enough money, you would become a "Big Money Donor." You could elect a speaker that represents who you want as a coach, and get a seat at the table and actually have a say like the Haslam's, etc.

Doing this would do multiple things: 1) It would shut the national media up about how the fans vetoed a coaching hire on social media, because this time the fan base actually nutted up and brought something to the table. 2) It would in essence make UT a community owned team like the Packers. Instead of actual shares, A non-profit could be created with an elected board, and if it kept enough money, it could contribute to donations, endowment funds and other things to keep a seat at the table. 3) It would change the landscape of college athletics and create more equity. The balance of power would shift from the few elites to the common many. Schools would be forced to listen to everyone, not just a handful of "mega-boosters."

I doubt anything comes of this, but I'm tired of people fighting about hypotheticals and what they would do if they had the chance. Here's your chance, either do it or shut up about it.

I think it's illegal.
 
#9
#9
We've all been debating and speculating on the future of Jeremy Pruitt for what seems like forever now, with no real agreement on what will happen or how it will play out. What we do know is that to buy out Pruitt and the staff it will cost about $19.2 million dollars, plus roughly another $20 million to buy out the new staff from their respective schools. We also know that UT only has about $10 million is reserves and is facing a significant financial loss this year, which may or may not prevent them from firing/hiring a new coach.

As has been expressed by multiple posters in multiple threads, people who want Pruitt replaced or think "Tennessee is at crossroads" if we don't make a change soon, would pay to see UT fire Pruitt and hire someone new (a totally different debate for another thread). My challenge to all of those people is: put up or shut up; stop talking about what you would do and actually do it. Start an official GoFundMe to raise money towards donating to the school to fund the buyout. If you raise enough money, you would become a "Big Money Donor." You could elect a speaker that represents who you want as a coach, and get a seat at the table and actually have a say like the Haslam's, etc.

Doing this would do multiple things: 1) It would shut the national media up about how the fans vetoed a coaching hire on social media, because this time the fan base actually nutted up and brought something to the table. 2) It would in essence make UT a community owned team like the Packers. Instead of actual shares, A non-profit could be created with an elected board, and if it kept enough money, it could contribute to donations, endowment funds and other things to keep a seat at the table. 3) It would change the landscape of college athletics and create more equity. The balance of power would shift from the few elites to the common many. Schools would be forced to listen to everyone, not just a handful of "mega-boosters."

I doubt anything comes of this, but I'm tired of people fighting about hypotheticals and what they would do if they had the chance. Here's your chance, either do it or shut up about it.

Congratulations! This is one of the more common sense articles that I have read and defines the situation. It is for darn sure all those that want Pruitt fired should shut up or put up the money to do so. "We are still paying Butch Jones." I have been of the opinion although never expressed that UT should have filed a law suit against Jones because of the poor condition that he left the program....only one lineman above 300 pounds and absolutely no speed...Pruitt recognized this and addressed it with players of sized and speed. We just need to give him some time to do it....look how long it took Clemson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volsack
#11
#11
We've all been debating and speculating on the future of Jeremy Pruitt for what seems like forever now, with no real agreement on what will happen or how it will play out. What we do know is that to buy out Pruitt and the staff it will cost about $19.2 million dollars, plus roughly another $20 million to buy out the new staff from their respective schools. We also know that UT only has about $10 million is reserves and is facing a significant financial loss this year, which may or may not prevent them from firing/hiring a new coach.

As has been expressed by multiple posters in multiple threads, people who want Pruitt replaced or think "Tennessee is at crossroads" if we don't make a change soon, would pay to see UT fire Pruitt and hire someone new (a totally different debate for another thread). My challenge to all of those people is: put up or shut up; stop talking about what you would do and actually do it. Start an official GoFundMe to raise money towards donating to the school to fund the buyout. If you raise enough money, you would become a "Big Money Donor." You could elect a speaker that represents who you want as a coach, and get a seat at the table and actually have a say like the Haslam's, etc.

Doing this would do multiple things: 1) It would shut the national media up about how the fans vetoed a coaching hire on social media, because this time the fan base actually nutted up and brought something to the table. 2) It would in essence make UT a community owned team like the Packers. Instead of actual shares, A non-profit could be created with an elected board, and if it kept enough money, it could contribute to donations, endowment funds and other things to keep a seat at the table. 3) It would change the landscape of college athletics and create more equity. The balance of power would shift from the few elites to the common many. Schools would be forced to listen to everyone, not just a handful of "mega-boosters."

I doubt anything comes of this, but I'm tired of people fighting about hypotheticals and what they would do if they had the chance. Here's your chance, either do it or shut up about it.
They ain’t gonna do nothin, just come on the internet and talk sh**, it’s their way. Some of them are prob professional trolls hired by other fan bases to try and create discord among UT fans. Freak are you properly vetting these people šŸ˜‚
 
#12
#12
Dabo was cleaning up in recruiting early on to give people some hope. He also wasn't NEARLY as bad, record wise, as Pruitt has been. Pruitts current class is WAY below par and has NO indication of improvement.
 
#13
#13
How does the UTAD make money OP? What drives these huge TV deals? Who buys tickets? Who buys merchandise?

For those of us that donate, do we get to help choose the next coach?

Because I don't feel good about paying a buyout to see the UTAD hire another losing or inexperienced HC.
 
#15
#15
We've all been debating and speculating on the future of Jeremy Pruitt for what seems like forever now, with no real agreement on what will happen or how it will play out. What we do know is that to buy out Pruitt and the staff it will cost about $19.2 million dollars, plus roughly another $20 million to buy out the new staff from their respective schools.

Hugh Freeze's buyout is nowhere near $20MM...

Napier's buyout is nowhere near $20MM, nor Fickell (His is either $3.5 or $4M depending on hire date), nor Chadwell

If we are going to start a thread like this, at least deal in facts and not make up some BS
 
#17
#17
You act as if the money UT makes doesn't come from fans anyway. What your asking here is for the fans to pay twice for Pruitt, because they've already paid once for him. Question, would everyone that donates get season tickets?
The fans don't actually pay for Pruitt. If you research how football economics work, the money to fund the football program doesn't come from tickets at all. Football is funded by big money donors, TV contracts and Nike/Adidas/UA money. Tickets go to fund other sports where the money is more efficiently used
 
#18
#18
Hugh Freeze's buyout is nowhere near $20MM...

Napier's buyout is nowhere near $20MM, nor Fickell (His is either $3.5 or $4M depending on hire date), nor Chadwell

If we are going to start a thread like this, at least deal in facts and not make up some BS
That's not just Freeze or whomever you want to bring in. IF you actually read my post it would take roughly that to buy out him and all the staff that comes along with a coaching change
 
#19
#19
How does the UTAD make money OP? What drives these huge TV deals? Who buys tickets? Who buys merchandise?

For those of us that donate, do we get to help choose the next coach?

Because I don't feel good about paying a buyout to see the UTAD hire another losing or inexperienced HC.
The football program is paid for by TV contracts, sponsorships, ad revenue. As I said in the post, if you generate enough money, you form a non-profit with a board for representation and then have a vote to determine the candidate the fans support
 
#20
#20
The fans don't actually pay for Pruitt. If you research how football economics work, the money to fund the football program doesn't come from tickets at all. Football is funded by big money donors, TV contracts and Nike/Adidas/UA money. Tickets go to fund other sports where the money is more efficiently used

Big money donors are fans. TV contracts are in place due to fans buying products advertised on TV. Nike pays Tennessee because Tennessee fans buy Tennessee gear. 100 percent of money generated by UT athletics ultimately comes from fans. Those other sports have to be funded no matter what due to title 9 rules. If fans stop buying tickets (which they are doing) the money to fund those sports has to come from somewhere. Football revenue is fan driven, period.
 
#22
#22
Big money donors are fans. TV contracts are in place due to fans buying products advertised on TV. Nike pays Tennessee because Tennessee fans buy Tennessee gear. 100 percent of money generated by UT athletics ultimately comes from fans. Those other sports have to be funded no matter what due to title 9 rules. If fans stop buying tickets (which they are doing) the money to fund those sports has to come from somewhere. Football revenue is fan driven, period.
You're moving the goalposts. I never said it wasn't fan generated, hell business who generates a profit is because of its "fans" what I'm saying is that in person tickets aren't the main driver of revenue for the football program. Reading comprehension is hard
 
#23
#23
That's not just Freeze or whomever you want to bring in. IF you actually read my post it would take roughly that to buy out him and all the staff that comes along with a coaching change

The cost of the buyouts would be nowhere near $20MM for Hugh and his staff or Fickell and his staff.

The buyouts of a coach leaving for another job is far less than if he is termed for cause. For example, Fickell would have to pay Cincy $3.5M if he leaves after 1/1/21. Technically, Fickell would owe that but many times the next school will pay part or all of it. (Remember, UCLA wouldnt pay Barnes buyout.)
 

Advertisement



Back
Top