2020 Presidential Race

#87,927
#87,927
Orange_Crush said:
You really should start reading.There DOES remain further actions. From the link:



In other words, PA EC activity is frozen. PA can't elect the president until this is sorted. And teh PA state legislature has started the cogs to take the EC into their own hands due to election fraud.
Click to expand...
The appointment of electors has already been done. This ruling doesn't overturn that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother and titansvolsfaninga
#87,928
#87,928
Orange_Crush said:
CIA cyber-crime expert: Hundreds of thousands of votes flipped to Biden

navid-statement.jpg
Click to expand...
Interesting...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, NurseGoodVol and Orange_Crush
#87,934
#87,934
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, I have.

Biden 306
Trump 232

Trump's legal team has been laughed out of every court in which they have appeared. The only thing they are accomplishing is the embarrassment of themselves.
Click to expand...

All you're doing is (once again) posting in such a way that you're proving you don't understand what's happening, and haven't been paying attention.

Good evening.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, NorthDallas40 and NCFisher
#87,936
#87,936
Orange_Crush said:
All you're doing is (once again) posting in such a way that you're proving you don;t understand what's happening, and haven't been paying attention.

Good evening.

Click to expand...

I understand that the results in Pennsylvania were certified on Tuesday... and Gov. Tom Wolf then chose the electors. That hasn't been overturned... and it won't be. There really isn't anything else to add. Those are the facts.
 
#87,940
#87,940
Rickyvol77 said:
Again they had committed other crimes against other men and women that day in that exact area which is why they were charged to begin with
Click to expand...

Courts are a little too busy playing their rules games to be disturbed with fact. If you can tweak the rules enough, nothing damaging is admissible. Too bad there's no such thing as liability for lawyers and judges when somebody gets away with a crime and then does it all over again. That's what happens when it's more about the proceedings (the rules of the game) than the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#87,942
#87,942
Orange_Crush said:
Looking like Wisconsin is set to toss out at least a couple of hundred thousand votes in their recount. If that's the case, predictions are that WI is about to turn Trump win. (Reports are at least 200,000 mail-in ballots with no request for mail-in ballot attached. By WI law, those must be tossed out.)
Click to expand...

They'll find a way to make it legal, so nobody is accused of voter suppression. Governments don't make mistakes - they've got it covered.
 
#87,943
#87,943
Orange_Crush said:
It's looking more and more that PA is about to turn Trump. And it sounds like WI may turn Trump by the end of the weekend. (Just what I'm hearing.) Also, it sounds like Lin Wood's case in GA is extremely strong. If he wins, it will put the EC in the hands of the state legislators.
Click to expand...
You've been cooking the last few days...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, volinsd, NurseGoodVol and 1 other person
#87,946
#87,946
Orange_Crush said:
You really should start reading.There DOES remain further actions. From the link:



In other words, PA EC activity is frozen. PA can't elect the president until this is sorted. And teh PA state legislature has started the cogs to take the EC into their own hands due to election fraud.
Click to expand...
Looks like it can't be sent to the Senate for certification, looks like the Pennsylvania legislature didn't appreciate the secretary of state making a deal with the dnc and trying to do what they constitutionally don't have the right to do. Pennsylvania is in stasis until The court motions are played out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Orange_Crush
#87,947
#87,947
BowlBrother85 said:
Your posts are a mix of wishful thinking, ignorance and fanciful delusion.
Click to expand...
The judge specifically wrote that the injunction is not moot due to the electors having already been appointed, since the electors are now restricted from voting. He went on to say that the case has a likelihood of being won, and that upon the case's victory, the state legislature would then have the right to bypass the unconstitutional election results and reassign the electors. This was in the judge's statement of whether more voters would be disenfranchised y an unconstitutional election standing, or by the legislature reassigning the electors.

That being said, this Court is mindful that
one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would
disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election
College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors
to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for
certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable
for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if
the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a
constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the
disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election
– not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of
Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which
hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and
free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result
in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results
of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5
Click to expand...

Like I said, you should read more and post less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cnick14, NorthDallas40, volinsd and 2 others
#87,950
#87,950
Rasputin_Vol said:
You've been cooking the last few days...
Click to expand...

The Lin Wood case in GA is incredibly intriguing. He claims that state constitution demands that only state legislature can change/add election law. He adds that the SoS changed/added mail-in law due to Covid. Thus, he claims the entire election was unconstitutional and void.

No one is denying that the SoS bypassed legislators to change the mail-in election laws.

I can't see how the GA election stands.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top