Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 99,664
- Likes
- 117,725
Undoubtedly I would choose no irregularities in every election, seems the 1 thing everyone agrees on.
My problem is it happening in every election and Trump telegraphing his intentions to use that so far in advance and his history of this tactic. The primaries and both general elections.
Unbelievably, members of the PA state legislature went on record all the way back in September. Admitted they were in talks with the Trump campaign about claiming widespread fraud (but only if he lost) followed by appointing the faithless electors. Trump losing the suburbs and gaining in the cities, threw a wrench in that plan.
I mean when you admit you're going to claim a crime before it even happens, and THEN start collecting evidence to support your claim..
I'm still learning how much tribalism rules politics now but it's hard to pretend that doesn't qualify as extremely suspicious. Hope we can agree on that also.
There’s no doubt both sides were gearing up for a legal fight after the election. Hillary is now famous for advising Biden not to concede. And tribalism is definitely the rule of the day in both parties.
We had all kinds of questions before the election if Biden was going to stack the courts and pass all sorts of legislation if they got control of the senate. How are those even questions? It’s not possible to pass anything like that unless you can get 60 votes.
Unless the Democrats were planning on using the simple majority plan.......which would be tyrannical behavior......but isn’t that what they were accusing Trump of?
I’m a big fan of split government. It forces the parties to seek common ground. Something that’s been in short supply the last 20ish years.


